journeymanisnothing
Member
- Mar 12, 2022
- 3,674
- 1,032
Yes sis, just that that. God decided he wanted people of faith to be his,Whosoever will.
Hath not God chosen the.....rich in faith Jas.2:5
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join Hidden in Him and For His Glory for discussions on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/become-a-vessel-of-honor-part-2.112306/
Yes sis, just that that. God decided he wanted people of faith to be his,Whosoever will.
D: Without faith it is impossible to please God.Yes sis, just that that. God decided he wanted people of faith to be his,
Hath not God chosen the.....rich in faith Jas.2:5
That's an excellent question that has many different possible answers. Here's a list of possibilities:True but none of that answers my question. Angels are referred to as “elect angels.” I’m asking if “elect” means the same when referring to the angels?
QUESTION—What is meant by τῶν ἐκλεκτῶν ἀγγέλων ‘the chosen angels’?
1. It means that God had chosen the angels for some service [Alf, Herm, TNTC; CEV, NASB, NIV, REB]: and their chosen angels. The angels were chosen by God and Christ Jesus [CEV]. God or Christ has chosen these angels to be his heavenly servants [Alf, TH]. God chose them to do his special tasks [WBC], to be his agents to carry out his will [NIGTC], to serve him and to watch over the affairs of humans [TC, TNTC]. God also chose them to take part in the final judgment [NIGTC]. In this context, probably the angels were chosen to be God’s instruments of judgment [ICC].
2. It means the elect angels [AB, BNTC, ECC, EGT, Lns, My, NAC, NIGTC, NTC, WBC, WP; HCSB, KJV, NIV, NRSV]. The designation ‘elect’ contrasts them with the fallen angels [BNTC, EGT, NAC, NIGTC, NTC, WP]. Or, the contrast is not in focus [My, WBC], since the single term ‘angels’ consistently refers to angels who did not fall and adding ‘elect’ would be superfluous [WBC]. God elected angels just as he elects men to be his own forever [Lns]. He has chosen them to be the objects of his love [My]. God decreed from all eternity to give these angels the grace of perseverance so they would not fall as did other angels [NTC].
3. It means the holy angels [TG; NLT, TEV]. This is a way of speaking about the angels as a group, without trying to specify some action or state for which they were chosen [TG].-Blight, R. C. (2009). An Exegetical Summary of 1 Timothy (p. 320). SIL International.
Yes people are saved when they believe, because they have to be saved in order to believe. Nevertheless election is prior to believing since election of a person took place before the foundation of the world Eph 1:4. Thats why is unconditional election.People are saved when the believe.
Those by the wayside are the ones who hear; then the devil comes and takes away the word out of their hearts, lest they should believe and be saved. Luke 8:12
- lest they should believe and be saved.
JLB
I agree, but want to be honest and admit I fail all the time, therefore "Thank YOU Jesus! My Lord and My God, for saving me~!"The test comes in how we actually behave towards real people. Dependence upon Christ’s sacrifice means you make yourself DO as he teaches whether you feel like it or not.
Well if you could why dont you. What are the points I made, lets discuss that to start.Hi, did you care to discuss the post?
D: Hi, well I could. Let me ask you, what are the elect elected before the foundation of the world to be and do?
Who said the elect didnt need salvation ?The elect need salvation just like everyone else.
Therefore I endure all things for the sake of the elect, that they also may obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory.
2 Timothy 2:10
JLB
Your position is predicated upon an unproven assumption, that there is only one version of us, the "fallen one" that actually came into existence.Yes people are saved when they believe, because they have to be saved in order to believe. Nevertheless election is prior to believing since election of a person took place before the foundation of the world Eph 1:4. Thats why is unconditional election.
4 just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love,
5 having predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will, (Eph. 1:4-5 NKJ)
For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast.- Paul, Eph 2:8-9.
Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, To the pilgrims of the Dispersion in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father.-Peter, 1 PET. 1;1-2.
I thought I already answered this, but don't see it posted. If my other reply exists, please excuse the "double post". To answer your question, I always "assumed it meant them same thing as election of humans". But now I'm not so sure and have to study this future. Here is a list of possibilities. Until I study this, I have no preference:True but none of that answers my question. Angels are referred to as “elect angels.” I’m asking if “elect” means the same when referring to the angels?
So do you believe God learns something new when He foreknows?
Yes anf God gave all mankind enough reason to have faith in him by our Lord Jesus. ?D: Without faith it is impossible to please God.
We were discussing foreknowledge, and you aren't clear at all.No I don’t.
However he does give us the freedom to choose, whether to obey Him or to turn away from Him and become lost.
He doesn’t force to remain “in Him”.
If anyone does not abide in Me, he is cast out as a branch and is withered; and they gather them and throw them into the fire, and they are burned. John 15:6
Here is how the scriptures instruct us to remain “in Christ”…
Now he who keeps His commandments abides in Him, and He in him. And by this we know that He abides in us, by the Spirit whom He has given us. 1 John 3:24
JLB
So are you comfortable with God deciding which men would go to hell and which angels likewise before they existed?I thought I already answered this, but don't see it posted. If my other reply exists, please excuse the "double post". To answer your question, I always "assumed it meant them same thing as election of humans". But now I'm not so sure and have to study this future. Here is a list of possibilities. Until I study this, I have no preference:
QUESTION—What is meant by τῶν ἐκλεκτῶν ἀγγέλων ‘the chosen angels’?
1. It means that God had chosen the angels for some service [Alf, Herm, TNTC; CEV, NASB, NIV, REB]: and their chosen angels. The angels were chosen by God and Christ Jesus [CEV]. God or Christ has chosen these angels to be his heavenly servants [Alf, TH]. God chose them to do his special tasks [WBC], to be his agents to carry out his will [NIGTC], to serve him and to watch over the affairs of humans [TC, TNTC]. God also chose them to take part in the final judgment [NIGTC]. In this context, probably the angels were chosen to be God’s instruments of judgment [ICC].
2. It means the elect angels [AB, BNTC, ECC, EGT, Lns, My, NAC, NIGTC, NTC, WBC, WP; HCSB, KJV, NIV, NRSV]. The designation ‘elect’ contrasts them with the fallen angels [BNTC, EGT, NAC, NIGTC, NTC, WP]. Or, the contrast is not in focus [My, WBC], since the single term ‘angels’ consistently refers to angels who did not fall and adding ‘elect’ would be superfluous [WBC]. God elected angels just as he elects men to be his own forever [Lns]. He has chosen them to be the objects of his love [My]. God decreed from all eternity to give these angels the grace of perseverance so they would not fall as did other angels [NTC].
3. It means the holy angels [TG; NLT, TEV]. This is a way of speaking about the angels as a group, without trying to specify some action or state for which they were chosen [TG].
Blight, R. C. (2009). An Exegetical Summary of 1 Timothy (p. 320). SIL International.
I did. What are the elected elected to do and to be?Well if you could why dont you. What are the points I made, lets discuss that to start.
WHAT do you believe happens when God "foreknows?" Describe what happens. Define what "knowing before" is.
Yes, God is Sovereign, Its His creation, He can do anything He wants. Praise be to God He did NOT Reprobate men or angels into Damnation. He could have, He has the right, but He didn't.So are you comfortable with God deciding which men would go to hell and which angels likewise before they existed?
God can do anything He wants but what He always wants is to do rightly. That limits Him. Choosing some for hell before they were born merely out of raw power (sovereignty) is wrong. What He does do is well said in 1 Chron 16:9Yes, God is Sovereign, Its His creation, He can do anything He wants. Praise be to God He did NOT Reprobate men or angels into Damnation. He could have, He has the right, but He didn't.
My position on this is simple, Calvin was wrong about Reprobation because he didn't realize its more likely God in His Omniscience, before He created, saw two versions of every creature. The Unfallen and the Fallen. We are the Fallen. But in the Mind of God, before the Fall, everyone had perfect free will, and all those who loved God back, when He loved them, can't be lost. All those who choose evil like the devil, and those who "sat on the fence" are given every opportunity to be saved in this fallen realm. And some might. But everyone, including the elect are saved through faith so all have an equal chance. You can see my full explanation of this on my site: EndTimeNews.Net "God's Plan for the Lost"
An analogy: I'm your neighbor. I see you throw out what I believe is good stuff, and keep what I consider junk. But its your stuff. While I don't like what you do, I have no right (or standing) to object to what you do, its yours.God can do anything He wants but what He always wants is to do rightly. That limits Him. Choosing some for hell before they were born merely out of raw power (sovereignty) is wrong. What He does do is well said in 1 Chron 16:9
The eyes of the Lord go to and fro throughout the earth that they might find the one, whose heart is completely His so He might fully support him.
D: Neither you nor I nor God considers people junk nor do any of us considering “throwing out” people or say your own children as an action over which no one else can speak against. If a neighbor throws out their baby, we actually feel an obligation to object. So your analogy doesn’t work.An analogy: I'm your neighbor. I see you throw out what I believe is good stuff, and keep what I consider junk. But its your stuff. While I don't like what you do, I have no right (or standing) to object to what you do, its yours.
So we cannot deny God "could have done it" if He wanted to, its His stuff.
D: What did I say happened? I don’t recall relating something that happened?BUT you argue against something I don't believe happened. Your objection is irrelevant and immaterial to me as I reject Reprobation.
D: No record of praise to Him in Heaven focuses on Him not reprobating. Doesn’t appear that anyone thinks like that there.Consider this, the fact God did not reprobate is perhaps one of the infinite reasons His praise in heaven never ceases. Everything could be so much worse if God weren't Holy, the Only One Impeccably Good:
8 The four living creatures, each having six wings, were full of eyes around and within. And they do not rest day or night, saying: "Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty, Who was and is and is to come!"
9 Whenever the living creatures give glory and honor and thanks to Him who sits on the throne, who lives forever and ever,
10 the twenty-four elders fall down before Him who sits on the throne and worship Him who lives forever and ever, and cast their crowns before the throne, saying:
11 "You are worthy, O Lord, To receive glory and honor and power; For You created all things, And by Your will they exist and were created."
(Rev. 4:8-5:1 NKJ)