Both are needed in that a faith that produces righteous works is the faith that saves. A faith that does not change a person into a new creation who loves has a faith that can not save him. They are NOT both needed in that a man is made righteous by the good he does. I shared the verse in Titus that PLAINLY says that.
Titus 3:5 doesn't say "a faith that produces righteous works is the faith that saves". Nowhere in Scripture is this taught. Here is the context:
For we ourselves
were once foolish, disobedient, led astray, slaves to various passions and pleasures, passing our days in malice and envy, hated by men and hating one another;
4 but when the goodness and loving kindness of God our Savior appeared, 5 he saved us,
not because of deeds done by us in righteousness, but in virtue of his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal in the Holy Spirit, 6 which he poured out upon us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior, 7 so that we might be justified by his grace and become heirs in
hope of eternal life. (Titus (RSV) 3)
Paul is not making the case that saving faith (another non-Biblical term) is a faith that "produces good deeds", he is saying that, we were saved form our previous life ("were once foolish"), not because we somehow EARNED His "goodness and loving kindness" while we were in it, but purely on the basis of His mercy.
Just because the word "deeds" is in the sentence doesn't mean it applies to a faith/works discussion.
How do you not see it? The answer to his rhetorical question is 'no'. A faith that does not find expression in works ('love your neighbor as yourself') cannot save a person. Paul says the same thing:
"The only thing that counts (toward justification--see context) is faith..."
What kind of faith?
"...faith expressing itself through love." (Galatians 5:6 NIV)
The faith that saves, the faith that justifies, is the faith that finds expression through the lawful command to "love your neighbor as yourself" (Leviticus 19:18). A faith that does not find expression through love is a faith that cannot justify (make) a person righteous.
This is what Paul means when he says "31 Do we...nullify the law by this faith? Not at all! Rather, we uphold the law (by this faith)." (Romans 3:31 NIV parenthesis mine) Saving faith does not nullify the law...it upholds and keeps it! The law summarized in "love your neighbor as yourself".
I see it as there is initial justification, usually through baptism ("the washing of regeneration and renewal in the Holy Spirit"), but also through "accepting Jesus as personal Lord and Savior". This justification can be lost by sin. The only way to regain this salvation is through repairing the relationship with Jesus that was broken by sin.
Charity IS works of the law. That is why faith upholds the law. Because faith in God's forgiveness and mercy is what causes us to love others.
Please show me where this is taught in Scripture. Where faith causes good works.
I'm glad you're bringing this up. Even there it shows us that Abraham's 'works' SHOWED God that he believed him.
"Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son.â€
Abraham was 'justified' by his actions in that they SHOWED him to be one who fears God. This is what James is teaching us, and which is plainly seen in the account itself.
So, when James says "Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he offered his son Isaac upon the altar?" he is REALLY saying "Abraham was 'justified' by his actions in that they SHOWED him to be one who fears God"? Hummm... I thought he was actually saying Abraham was justified when he offered his son Isaac upon the altar.
Yes. He was SHOWN to have believed God's promise by the fact that he acted in full surety of that promise. To be shown to be righteous is also called 'being justified'. Just as being made righteous is also called 'being justified'. If you do not believe me look it up in the dictionary. And there is an example of this other use of 'justify' in the gospels that illustrates what it means to 'show' (justify) oneself as being righteous.
That may be true, but not here. The plain words of Scripture SHOW Abraham and Rahab being justified (in the salvific sense) by their works. The first sentence is "What does it profit, my brethren, if a man says he has faith but has not works? Can his faith
save him?" Notice it doesn't say "his faith has already saved him, and his works show what kind of faith he has". I know that's what you want it to say.
He would have been showing that he really did not believe God's promise made to him...the promise that God had earlier declared him righteous for believing. His actions are how God knew he had really believed him (God already knew of course. The story is for our benefit so that we will be careful to have a faith that causes us to respond as if we really do believe).
Abraham was made righteous ('justified') when he believed. Abraham was shown to be righteous (also called 'justified') when he acted as a result of his faith. If he had not been made righteous by faith he would not have had actions that would show him to be righteous by that faith. Understand?
Ask yourself why he had to be justified again if he was already justified for believing? The incident you (and Paul) are referring to happens in Gen. 15:6
"And he brought him outside and said, "Look toward heaven, and number the stars, if you are able to number them." Then he said to him, "So shall your descendants be." 6 And he believed the LORD; and he reckoned it to him as righteousness. (Genesis (RSV) 15)
Abraham was justified (in the salvific sense) BEFORE this event. Heb 11:8
By faith Abraham obeyed when he was called to go out to a place which he was to receive as an inheritance; and he went out, not knowing where he was to go. (Hebrews (RSV) 11)
This event occurred in Gen 12:1, years before he "believed God...".
If justification is a one time event, how is it that Abraham was justified three times? Once in Gen 12, once in Gen 15 and once when he "offered Issac"?
I understand fine, thanks, do you?
I'll walk through the passage verse by verse if you want. Actually I'd prefer that we did that.
Go ahead, just use the actual words of Scripture instead of what you want them to be.