CARM is a Calvinistic source by Matt Slick, a Presbyterian minister, and I don't find those points to be consistent with the 5 points of Arminianism.
Very helpful. Thanks
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
CARM is a Calvinistic source by Matt Slick, a Presbyterian minister, and I don't find those points to be consistent with the 5 points of Arminianism.
How could the Lord wish for all to come to repentance if He, being God, knows who will be saved ? How could the above statement make any sense at all?
How can we be holy & without blame without being saved?
You tell me.
I got the name from your post.
From your post —
Theodoret explains it to mean ploughing a straight furrow. Parry argues that the metaphor is the stone mason cutting the stones...
JLB
Are you Arminian or Calvinist?
JLB
If you read what I wrote, I cited A T Robertson who wrote of what Parry said. I don't know who Parry is, but Parry's statement harmonises with the exegesis of that text and the meaning of 'rightly dividing'.
Why do you ask? What has that to do with the statements I've made that both Calvinists and Arminians use Scripture to back up their opposing theologies.
You used it incorrectly because “all” is related to “beloved” (2 Peter 3:8) and “you” (2 Peter 3:9) ... not ‘all men without exception’. It is a common error when stripping verses from their context.if you think I used it incorrectly then that is what you should state and give the reason why.
... and this is NOT a common theme found in scripture, but a common theme claimed by people.It is our free will that allows us to accept His invitation or not.
I am forcing nothing. I merely refuse to deny the scripture that claims “God chose us” and substitute “we must choose God or grace is powerless to save us”.You are trying to force the idea that if a person is predestined because of God’s foreknowledge, he somehow has no choice if he is saved or not; has no ability to choose to either obey the Lord or fall away.
How can Judas have been ”destined” to rule and also be the “son of perdition” lost to fulfill prophecy? If he was lost to fulfill prophecy, then how was he not destined to be lost? Could God have gotten a prophecy wrong?All 12 disciples were destined to reign and rule with Christ.
“Whoever believes” means just that. No more and no less.For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. John 3:16
This verse does not say....
For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that those predestined to be saved should not perish but have everlasting life. Calvinism 3:16
rather I will accept it because “scripture says it”. If that is not the unavoidable conclusion, then so be it.
How can Judas have been ”destined” to rule and also be the “son of perdition” lost to fulfill prophecy? If he was lost to fulfill prophecy, then how was he not destined to be lost? Could God have gotten a prophecy wrong?
“Whoever believes” means just that. No more and no less.
Yes, although the original has no emphasis on “that”. In fact “that” is not even a word on the original text, it appears to be linked to “ἡμᾶς” (“that we”).Ok can you accept that this scripture says...just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love,
You have a much more fluid definition of “destiny” than I do.Judas was destined to rule with Christ, and the others, just as this scripture reveals.
Yes, although the original has no emphasis on “that”. In fact “that” is not even a word on the original text, it appears to be linked to “ἡμᾶς” (“that we”).
However, I agree that God chose us.
I agree that God chose us “in Christ”.
I agree that God chose us to be before Him without blame.
Here are some other translations (just to compare how other experts rendered the same Greek into English):
[Eph 1:3-4]
- [KJV] 3 Blessed [be] the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly [places] in Christ: 4 According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:
- [NLT] 3 All praise to God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly realms because we are united with Christ. 4 Even before he made the world, God loved us and chose us in Christ to be holy and without fault in his eyes.
- [NIV] 3 Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in the heavenly realms with every spiritual blessing in Christ. 4 For he chose us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight. In love
- [NASB] 3 Blessed [be] the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly [places] in Christ, 4 just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we would be holy and blameless before Him. In love
- [YLT] 3 Blessed [is] the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who did bless us in every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ, 4 according as He did choose us in him before the foundation of the world, for our being holy and unblemished before Him, in love,
- [DBY] 3 Blessed [be] the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenlies in Christ; 4 according as he has chosen us in him before [the] world's foundation, that we should be holy and blameless before him in love;
You have a much more fluid definition of “destiny” than I do.
Who is stripping verses from their context?You used it incorrectly because “all” is related to “beloved” (2 Peter 3:8) and “you” (2 Peter 3:9) ... not ‘all men without exception’. It is a common error when stripping verses from their context.