hmmm, in the past you refused to define "Free Will" (re:
Hospes interaction). There seems little reason to proceed as this is the basis of the thread you propose.
First of all I NEVER refuse to define anything someone asks me to define.
Second, I went on for post after post with
Hospes regarding how I understand free will.
It is Hospes that does not care to understand how free will has ALWAYS been defined.
You don't have to participate in any thread you don't like.
I don't know why as 'prevenient grace' is a term your side invented to try to explain away man's inability to respond to God's offer of salvation in lieu of man's depravity.
Prevenient grace is the true meaning of how God distributes His grace to the non-believer.
I don't care much for terms invented by MAN.
Please don't bring up the Trinity or the Hypostatic Union - these were discussed in the early days of Christianity to make official
what the church believes to be true after much debate.
Agreed, 'prevenient grace' is not found in scripture. I assume you mean the "words" and not the "concept". The explanation of how man overcomes his depravity to respond to God is vital to your case and therefore would have to be examined.
You assumed correctly.
I really don't think we have an big enough audience to make worth while an exchange of ideas. Also, though you are a worthy opponent, you often make false claims about what Calvinism teaches ... i.e. double predestination, God creates evil, ideas of Calvinism started in 1500s ....
We have a very big audience --- but I'm also speaking to you.
I truly believe that if you studied Calvinism enough...it would begin to make no sense to you --- because it doesn't.
I don't make false claims FF. I know what Calvinism is. HOW they teach it at your church, I wouldn't know.
I'm not claiming to know what YOU personally believe or what your church teaches.
I claim to be stating what CALVINISM teaches...you know, what John Calvin believed to be true.
It might be YOU that does not agree with John Calvin.
Let's go down the list you made:
1. Calvinism does not teach double predestination. (your claim).
John Calvin taught that some men are created for salvation and some are created for damnation.
By predestination we mean the eternal decree of God, by which he determined with himself whatever he wished to happen with regard to every man. All are not created on equal terms, but some are preordained to eternal life, others to eternal damnation; and, accordingly, as each has been created for one or other of these ends, we say that he has been predestinated to life or to death.
Source: John Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion
Book 3
Chapter 21
Paragraph 5
If the above does not signify double predestination to you...could you please explain exactly what it DOES mean to you??
2. God creates Evil
If God has predertermined everything...
If God has created everything...
then He has also created evil.
However, by calvinist theory....persons are still responsible for their evil
even though God ordained and predestined the evil the commit !!
There is a lot of MYSTERY in the calvinist belief system. That is because it makes no sense.....
Here's John Piper...I do believe he's a calvinist....
and he does agree with John Calvin BTW.
Sample below:
Again, this is not accurate. I am not a church historian ... but Calvinism can be traced back to Augustine ... (Aside: it is not possible to trace every doctrine propagation through time from Christ to you and I. They debated the concept of the Trinity of 100s of years (I believe) ... same for hypostatic union.
Proof
"Many
Protestants, especially
Calvinists and
Lutherans, consider him [Augustine] one of the theological fathers of the
Protestant Reformation due to his teachings on
salvation and
divine grace"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustine_of_Hippo
..."Augustine's understanding of the consequences of original sin and the necessity of redeeming grace was developed in the struggle against
Pelagius and his
Pelagian" .... see, Calvinist (Calvin, Augustine, whoever still fighting the same fight. With Augustine it was pelagianism .... today it is the semi-pelagians
Last time I gave a citation showing Calvinist's (R.C. Sproul) rejected Double Predestination you ignored it and continue to errantly propagate the idea that REFORM doctrine supports Double Predestination.
Oh really. You want to discuss Augustine?
First of all, he's not an early church father...He was born in about 400 AD
He is the ONLY church father that brought forth the idea of predestination..
it was NEVER even CONSIDERED before him.
Do you know his concept of Original Sin?
And because RC Sproul rejects double predestination is meaningless.....
If God elects some for salvation --
the others are going to hell.
THAT is double predestination.
As I've stated...calvinism makes no sense.
It sounds like double-speak.