This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Lacking for what?
No, the article is there. And it is the very argument the text is making.
There is no “it” this post was an experiment
Implicitly it does refer to that but we must also do our part!
What is our part?
Is Christ the only head of the church?
You did say church?
"And he is the head [singular] of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy. Colossians 1:18
No, just one person.
I know right. Some ideas just get too deep to get out of. I just try to make a logical point and get dragged into an abyss of Greek. Sometimes I despair at the understanding on the Earth and among God's people.
That would be you, right?
Our part is to believe in it.
You ignore the word 'other', and you went so far as to say the word 'the' wasn't even in the original Greek. If you had not done either of these we would not have had to show you the original Greek.
No, you were the one challenging the words of 2 Peter 3:16 to make a point that the verse does not support.
If you would admit that for Paul or Peter to call their own writings Scripture would not be in their character nor the nature of any Jewish person we wouldn't have gotten into the Greek. So tit-for-tat.
Your argument is meaningless since we now know that Paul and Peter's writings are indeed scripture. Do you want to continue with your meaningless argument?
Yes.