Jethro Bodine
Member
- Oct 31, 2011
- 23,344
- 5,949
Re: James 2 And OSAS
OSAS says David did not need to repent to be saved on the Day of Judgment, and that the real evil is suggesting that he did.
This is sounding more and more like an unbelievers argument--calling good evil, black white, bitter sweet, etc.
Not sure what some call OSAS? I will trust the Word of God and not the doubts that mans religion attempts to place on Gods promise.When does God forgive? When you have faith in that forgiveness, or when you don't have faith in that forgiveness?Ro 4:6 Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works,
7 Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered.
8 Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin.
Looks like when God forgives, no one can make a charge
OSAS says someone in David's sandals doesn't even have to have faith to be forgiven and accepted by God. And worse, if someone like Nathan comes along and rebukes him for his failure it is Nathan that is in the wrong for doing that...you know, being harsh and judgmental and all.
Which makes we wonder...why doesn't OSAS cover the so-called wrong of the one who says the child of God who stops believing in the promise forfeits salvation? But it seems by reading these posts that is the person who isn't covered by the grace of OSAS. It sounds more and more like the unbelievers argument the more I think about it.
Ro 4:6 Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works,
7 Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered.
8 Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin.
OSAS says David did not need to repent to be saved on the Day of Judgment, and that the real evil is suggesting that he did.
This is sounding more and more like an unbelievers argument--calling good evil, black white, bitter sweet, etc.