Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Justification: Why works are a stumbling block for some.

Francis,

What about the thief on the cross? Based on what did Christ declare his entrance into heaven? He wasn't on that cross because he was on Santa's good kid list. But Christ said "you will be with me in paradise" as an answer to the thief's request that Christ would "remember me when you come into your kingdom." (Luke 23:42, 43) There is no mention of any works there.
 
airdrop said:
Francis,

What about the thief on the cross? Based on what did Christ declare his entrance into heaven? He wasn't on that cross because he was on Santa's good kid list. But Christ said "you will be with me in paradise" as an answer to the thief's request that Christ would "remember me when you come into your kingdom." (Luke 23:42, 43) There is no mention of any works there.
Didn't a Roman Catholic baptize the thief when he was an infant?!
whisper.gif
 
airdrop said:
Francis,

What about the thief on the cross? Based on what did Christ declare his entrance into heaven? He wasn't on that cross because he was on Santa's good kid list. But Christ said "you will be with me in paradise" as an answer to the thief's request that Christ would "remember me when you come into your kingdom." (Luke 23:42, 43) There is no mention of any works there.

****
Surely that is the Romans 8:1 Truth. He died IN CHRIST! (the thief)
But you are not dead 'IN' Christ yet, right? :wink:

And Works?? If LOVE for Christ do not produce Acts 5:32 OBEDIENCE, they are 'SICK' Works that follow, and the one or 'ones' will be Spewed Out when maturely so! Revelation 3:14-17.
You can be sure of Christ's own Words!

---John
 
francisdesales said:
The problem is the definition of faith. Once that is defined and understood, I think many more people will agree with each other.
This is a good point. I am increasingly suspicious of the view that faith is constituted by a simple act of assent and acceptance - believing that Jesus died for our sins and choosing (even if this choice is "imputed" us) to make him Lord of our lives, as if this lordship can legitimately be said to be "real" in the absence of works. I suspect that the very meaning of the word "faith". as intended by the writers of Scripture, has an element of works inextricably bound up in it. In short, I propose that it is simply incoherent to talk about faith as a reality that is distinct from works (and therefore "precedes" it, as many, if not most, evangelicals will argue).

I am inclined to think that we have created a definition of "faith" which, if carefully analysed, really amounts to nothing, especially in light of the teachings of Jesus, which to me clearly indicate salvation depends to some degree on what we do.

So I am inclined to think that saying we can have a saving faith without works is probably at odds with what Jesus is telling us. To take Jesus' teachings about salvation and suggest that works are a sign of salvation and not an essential pre-condition of it does not work in my view.

Stated perhaps overly simplistically, I think we need to "interpret Paul in deference to Jesus" rather than the other way around.

So in short, I believe that a certian kind of "works" is indeed required for salvation. Its a tricky case to make and I do not for a moment suggest that this post has made the case in any kind of substantive way.
 
Drew said:
This is a good point. I am increasingly suspicious of the view that faith is constituted by a simple act of assent and acceptance - believing that Jesus died for our sins and choosing (even if this choice is "imputed" us) to make him Lord of our lives, as if this lordship can legitimately be said to be "real" in the absence of works. I suspect that the very meaning of the word "faith". as intended by the writers of Scripture, has an element of works inextricably bound up in it. In short, I propose that it is simply incoherent to talk about faith as a reality that is distinct from works (and therefore "precedes" it, as many, if not most, evangelicals will argue).

I am inclined to think that we have created a definition of "faith" which, if carefully analysed, really amounts to nothing, especially in light of the teachings of Jesus, which to me clearly indicate salvation depends to some degree on what we do.

So I am inclined to think that saying we can have a saving faith without works is probably at odds with what Jesus is telling us. To take Jesus' teachings about salvation and suggest that works are a sign of salvation and not an essential pre-condition of it does not work in my view.

Stated perhaps overly simplistically, I think we need to "interpret Paul in deference to Jesus" rather than the other way around.

So in short, I believe that a certian kind of "works" is indeed required for salvation. Its a tricky case to make and I do not for a moment suggest that this post has made the case in any kind of substantive way.


***
Hi, John here is guessing that he thinks that you are even being to passive! :wink: (with the 'inclined to think')

But, you are right anyway! There can be NO Everlasting Gospel or Everlasting Covenant With Out a Working Obedient Faith! Acts 5:32 + James 2:20 & James 2:24-26.

Adam was tested by a WORKING FAITH! Maturity can be achieved no other way. And besides, who that is Born Again would want to do away with the True Motive for service?? That of Loving the Master.

Look over the ones in the K.J. found in John 12:42-43 for a real Faith, yet, only 1/2 Gospel that equals NO SAVING GOSPEL!!! (exactly like todays Revelation 18:4) Those other verses are Revelation 14:6 & Hebrews 13:20.
 
Solo said:
Didn't a Roman Catholic baptize the thief when he was an infant?!

If you can stop being sarcastic for a moment and remember the Scriptures that you supposedly love...

"If any man thirst, let him come to me, and drink. He that believeth in me, as the scripture saith, 'Out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.' Now this he said of the Spirit which they should receive, who believed in him: for as yet the Spirit was not given, because Jesus was not yet glorified" John 7:37-39

Thus, no one was Baptized by a Catholic before Christ was glorified.

Regards
 
airdrop said:
Francis,

What about the thief on the cross? Based on what did Christ declare his entrance into heaven? He wasn't on that cross because he was on Santa's good kid list. But Christ said "you will be with me in paradise" as an answer to the thief's request that Christ would "remember me when you come into your kingdom." (Luke 23:42, 43) There is no mention of any works there.

Several comments regarding the good thief and salvation.

First, the Church has said that God is not bound by the sacrament of Baptism absolutely. Otherwise, what would become of those millions of souls who predated Christ or never had the opportunity to become literally baptized? Is God bound to condemn them?

Secondly, the exception does not define the rule.

And finally, the good thief DID perform "works". First, he repented. If you will note the Gospel of Matthew, it says that BOTH thiefs were hurling insults at the Lord. Thus, the good thief came to a point of recognizing Jesus as something special. Perhaps he had heard of Jesus before and was as yet neutral - but Christ's exhibition of love on the cross moved the man. Secondly, the man defended Christ from the insults of the bad thief. Thus, he was bearing witness to his beliefs the Jesus was something different. And finally, the thief shows that he has heard Christ's teachings by asking the Lord to remember him after their death. Thus, the man is showing that he believed that Christ was the Son of God and had power to aid him in the next life. The good thief had done as much as could be expected to do - and God, in His infinite mercy, forgave the man based on the man's faith working in love...

The man's faith was not merely an internal knowledge or an intellectual assent. It was a faith in action.

Regards
 
francisdesales said:
If you can stop being sarcastic for a moment and remember the Scriptures that you supposedly love...

"If any man thirst, let him come to me, and drink. He that believeth in me, as the scripture saith, 'Out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.' Now this he said of the Spirit which they should receive, who believed in him: for as yet the Spirit was not given, because Jesus was not yet glorified" John 7:37-39

Thus, no one was Baptized by a Catholic before Christ was glorified.

Regards
Good because I thought that the Catholics were going to claim having baptized Jesus Christ also. What a relief! :D

Seriously though, is it the Catholic belief that when a person is baptized as an infant in the Roman Catholic Church they are then born again? What is your testimony of your salvation?
 
francisdesales said:
Several comments regarding the good thief and salvation.

First, the Church has said that God is not bound by the sacrament of Baptism absolutely. Otherwise, what would become of those millions of souls who predated Christ or never had the opportunity to become literally baptized? Is God bound to condemn them?

Secondly, the exception does not define the rule.

And finally, the good thief DID perform "works". First, he repented. If you will note the Gospel of Matthew, it says that BOTH thiefs were hurling insults at the Lord. Thus, the good thief came to a point of recognizing Jesus as something special. Perhaps he had heard of Jesus before and was as yet neutral - but Christ's exhibition of love on the cross moved the man. Secondly, the man defended Christ from the insults of the bad thief. Thus, he was bearing witness to his beliefs the Jesus was something different. And finally, the thief shows that he has heard Christ's teachings by asking the Lord to remember him after their death. Thus, the man is showing that he believed that Christ was the Son of God and had power to aid him in the next life. The good thief had done as much as could be expected to do - and God, in His infinite mercy, forgave the man based on the man's faith working in love...

The man's faith was not merely an internal knowledge or an intellectual assent. It was a faith in action.

Regards
Did the thief know the truth apart from it being revealed to him by the Holy Spirit? The scripture says that the natural man cannot understand the spiritual things of God for it is foolishness to him, so doesn't God get the credit for this man repenting, believing, and following Jesus?

Does not God draw all men to Jesus Christ?
 
Drew said:
This is a good point. I am increasingly suspicious of the view that faith is constituted by a simple act of assent and acceptance - believing that Jesus died for our sins and choosing (even if this choice is "imputed" us) to make him Lord of our lives, as if this lordship can legitimately be said to be "real" in the absence of works. I suspect that the very meaning of the word "faith". as intended by the writers of Scripture, has an element of works inextricably bound up in it. In short, I propose that it is simply incoherent to talk about faith as a reality that is distinct from works (and therefore "precedes" it, as many, if not most, evangelicals will argue).

If you come from a Protestant background, Drew, you have come a long way. Faith and works of love cannot be separated and remain salvific. Consider the letter to the Romans (Luther's supposed revelation comes from here) and the bookends of it - "the obedience of faith". Here, Paul is telling us that obeying God IS part of the formula of faith! Obedience is done by action, willing choosing God over sin. Usually, this means actively doing something. James even tells us that it is a sin to NOT do what is right when we know we should. Thus, faith and works are inextricably linked.


Drew said:
I am inclined to think that we have created a definition of "faith" which, if carefully analysed, really amounts to nothing, especially in light of the teachings of Jesus, which to me clearly indicate salvation depends to some degree on what we do.

So I am inclined to think that saying we can have a saving faith without works is probably at odds with what Jesus is telling us. To take Jesus' teachings about salvation and suggest that works are a sign of salvation and not an essential pre-condition of it does not work in my view.

Stated perhaps overly simplistically, I think we need to "interpret Paul in deference to Jesus" rather than the other way around.

I often wonder why some of my Protestant brothers make Paul to be a "canon within a canon", placing Jesus' own words as secondary to an understanding of Paul (incorrect, of course) that makes trusting in God's promise as all one needs for salvation.


Drew said:
So in short, I believe that a certian kind of "works" is indeed required for salvation. Its a tricky case to make and I do not for a moment suggest that this post has made the case in any kind of substantive way.

I will say that love is absolutely necessary to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. I find it difficult that people, after reading Scriptures, miss this key theme. How does one love another person by merely having intellectual trust in God's promises? Paul himself says, in 1 Cor 13:2, that having all the faith in the world is useless without love. Jesus gave us one commandment - to love as He loved. We are far from the Kingdom if we cannot love but claim to have faith in God. This is difficult to mesh with the rest of the Scriptures.

Regards
 
Francisdesales wrote: …I find it difficult that people, after reading Scriptures, miss this key theme….[/F]

LOL. That’s easy. It’s because they believe the Bible but not what it says.
:wink:
 
unred typo said:
Francisdesales wrote: …I find it difficult that people, after reading Scriptures, miss this key theme….[/F]

LOL. That’s easy. It’s because they believe the Bible but not what it says.
:wink:

That's true. If you twist Scriptures enough, you can get it to say practically anything you want...

Regards
 
francisdesales said:
That's true. If you twist Scriptures enough, you can get it to say practically anything you want...

Regards

***
John here: Like Mark 7:7 & Jeremiah 17:5 Catholic stuff, huh! :sad
 
John the Baptist said:
***
John here: Like Mark 7:7 & Jeremiah 17:5 Catholic stuff, huh! :sad

Actually, I had in mind John 6 and those who try to twist Christ's very clear words that we must eat His flesh and drink His blood...

Obviously, such twisting of Scripture is, like you say, an example of Mark 7:7.

Regards
 
francisdesales said:
Actually, I had in mind John 6 and those who try to twist Christ's very clear words that we must eat His flesh and drink His blood...

Obviously, such twisting of Scripture is, like you say, an example of Mark 7:7.

Regards
_____

John here: You mean John 6:53? Christ does tell it more straight a verse or two on, in the same chapter of John 6:60-63 for some, huh? Something equal to Matthew 4:4 with 1 Corinthians 10:1-4 & 2 Timothy 3:16's requirement to understand His Doctrine. :fadein:
 
John the Baptist said:
_____

John here: You mean John 6:53? Christ does tell it more straight a verse or two on, in the same chapter of John 6:60-63 for some, huh? Something equal to Matthew 4:4 with 1 Corinthians 10:1-4 & 2 Timothy 3:16's requirement to understand His Doctrine. :fadein:

John 6:60-63 doesn't deny Christ's "Truly, truly, I tell you"!!! You are twisting the Sacred Scriptures, no matter how many chapters you cite that have nothing to do with John 6...

Regards
 
Works become a stumbling block when they are religious ceremonial works or works of the flesh where the person is only satisfying his own desires and lusts. When a ceremonial rite becomes the means of salvation instead of symbolic for that person, they have stumbled over the words and haven’t realized the true meaning of the illustration. The disciples who left Christ thought that he was talking about his actual body and blood and not the symbolic meaning of taking in his words and living by them. If we follow the words of Christ, we will be abiding in life, just as surely as we live physically by eating and drinking.

Some people take the words too literally while others slide over them and put no meaning to them. The words ’believe in’ mean to trust in someone and what they tell you to do. If you reduce the message of Christ to merely believing that he died for your sin, you have devalued the gospel. He died for your sins so that you could die to sin and become a new creature in Christ.
 
unred typo said:
Works become a stumbling block when they are religious ceremonial works or works of the flesh where the person is only satisfying his own desires and lusts. When a ceremonial rite becomes the means of salvation instead of symbolic for that person, they have stumbled over the words and haven’t realized the true meaning of the illustration.

I agree. We are supposed to move our minds to what the symbol means, what it invokes within us. Doing rituals for the sake of doing rituals is meaningless.

unred typo said:
Some people take the words too literally while others slide over them and put no meaning to them. The words ’believe in’ mean to trust in someone and what they tell you to do. If you reduce the message of Christ to merely believing that he died for your sin, you have devalued the gospel. He died for your sins so that you could die to sin and become a new creature in Christ.

Very well said. Unless we crucify our fleshy desires, we do not belong to Christ (Gal 5:24), no matter how much we quote Scriptures or claim to believe in His Redemptive Work on the Cross.

Those who do not do the Will of the Father will not have eternal life. That includes taking up our cross DAILY and following the Way, not just sitting back and making meaningless proclamations...

Regards
 
Yes, God knows who is saved and He knows who is justified in His eyes. That goes without saying. But you make the distinction between Paul and James in the different types of justification. In both cases, I would say they are the same in that God is the author and finisher of our faith AND our works. Works do NOT automatically come as if on a conveyor belt. We can do NO GOOD without Christ! Thus, justification is before God. And of course, works of love are an outward sign of our faith - thus, both are required for salvation.

Paul and James were not standing toe to toe, so to speak, arguing against each other. They were standing back to back defending the same truth against two different attacks. You were right up until the point you said this "thus, both are required for salvation" This is why...

Romans 4:5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.

God's Righteousness, which is what saves us, is imputed the moment we believe. We know this happened if the righteousness of God begins to manifest itself in our lives in good works/fruit. This leaves the works/fruit as an evidence of a true faith that has already resulted in the imputed righteousness of God, not the cause of it.

I agree - and that faith, by James definition, was not enough to be saved. One had to show that faith through their actions of love. Without expression, faith is dead and worthless. James himself says faith cannot save without works of love.

This does not mean that works are the cause of our salvation, but the works will be an evidence of it.

I do not believe in "imputed righteousness" because God changes what He declares. If someone is declared righteous, that person IS righteous in the eyes of the only One Who matters - God.

You have replaced God's righteousness, that which does save, with your works. Your works are a manifestation of God's righteousness working in you.

I agree - and that faith, by James definition, was not enough to be saved. One had to show that faith through their actions of love. Without expression, faith is dead and worthless. James himself says faith cannot save without works of love.

Romans 4:5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.

We are saved by the "righteousness of God", nothing else. If you have sinned one time while being under the law, you are destined for hell unless you have the imputed "righteousness of God".

francisdesales, please look this over carefully and ask yourself "how does it all fit together?"

The only way to have the "righteousness of God' imputed is by faith Alone. The works are a result of being in Christ, not the cause of it. Once one makes works the cause he has "not submitted to the righteousness of God" and has given evidence that he is under the law.

Romans 10:3-4 For they being ignorant of God’s righteousness, and seeking to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted to the righteousness of God. 4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.

Philippians 3:9 and be found in Him, not having my own righteousness, which is from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which is from God by faith;

Galatians 3:1 O foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you that you should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed among you as crucified? 2 This only I want to learn from you: Did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? 3 Are you so foolish? Having begun in the Spirit, are you now being made perfect by the flesh? 4 Have you suffered so many things in vainâ€â€if indeed it was in vain?5 Therefore He who supplies the Spirit to you and works miracles among you, does He do it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? 6 just as Abraham “believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.†7 Therefore know that only those who are of faith are sons of Abraham. 8 And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel to Abraham beforehand, saying, “In you all the nations shall be blessed.†9 So then those who are of faith are blessed with believing Abraham.

Galatians 2:21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

Romans 10:9 If thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, THOU SHALT BE SAVED.

If we sin once, we are guilty of all. We cannot be made righteous before God by our own merits because we have already failed and all the good deads in the world will not remove the penalty of death that results from being found guilty from that one sin. If we sin once, we are found guilty of all and are hell bound, unless, we, through faith, are imputed with the righteousness of God. If we have sinned once, then by God's law, we are guilty and no good works can overcome this.

Our works are an evidence, always. It is only faith that can save us, because it is only by faith that we can receive the imputed righteousness of God. If we have sinned once we are guilty of all.

James 2:10 "For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all."

God, by His mercy, He provided a way, an Advocate.

1 Peter 3:18 "For Christ also hath ***once*** suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God."

1 Peter 2:24 "Who [Jesus] his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness."

Jesus suffered God's wrath that was due to us. He went to the cross sinless, the only substitute that was acceptable to God, the perfect Lamb of God.

Paul tells us...

Romans 3:28,31 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith apart from the deeds of the law...Do we then make void the law through faith? Certainly not! On the contrary, we establish the law.

What Paul is saying is that God's justice, His law, required payment for our sin, and the law is not made void, but established because Jesus died for us. If their was no law, Jesus would not have needed to die for us.

Faith results in us receiving the righteousness of God. The righteousness of God is Jesus' imputed righteousness.

Romans 3:21 But now the righteousness of God apart from the law is revealed, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, 22 even the righteousness of God, through faith in Jesus Christ, to all and on all who believe. For there is no difference; 23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 being justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, 25 whom God set forth as a propitiation by His blood, through faith, to demonstrate His righteousness, because in His forbearance God had passed over the sins that were previously committed, 26 to demonstrate at the present time His righteousness, that He might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.

But the law does not go away for those NOT in Christ, they will be judged by the Law. We are "in Christ", so we are not under the Law, but grace.

Romans 3:19 Now we know that whatever the law says, it says to those who are under the law, that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. 20 Therefore by the deeds of the law no flesh will be justified in His sight, for by the law is the knowledge of sin.

Those who think that they can overcome God's wrath by any means other than the righteousness of God alone, which is through faith alone, are giving evidence that they are still under the law.

Romans 10:3-4 For they being ignorant of God’s righteousness, and seeking to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted to the righteousness of God. 4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.

Titus 3:5 "Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us."

Galatians 2:16 "By the works of the law shall no flesh be justified."

Only the RIGHTEOUSNESS OF GOD can save you.

Romans 1:17 For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith; as it is written, "The just[ified] shall live by faith." See Hebrews 11

Romans 4:1-5 What then shall we say that Abraham our father has found according to the flesh? For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God. For what does the Scripture say? "Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness." Now to him who works, the wages are not counted as grace but as debt. But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness,

2 Corinthians 5:21 For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.

Again, if you trust in your works you will hear "Depart from Me, I never knew you", because...

Romans 10:3-4 For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and seeking to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted to the righteousness of God. For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.

This is our righteousness absent of the righteousness of God.

Isaiah 64:6 But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away.

From the same book, speaking of the righteousness of God which justifies.

Isaiah 54:17 No weapon formed against you shall prosper, And every tongue which rises against you in judgment You shall condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, And their righteousness is from Me,†Says the LORD.

Isaiah 61:10 10 I will greatly rejoice in the LORD, My soul shall be joyful in my God; For He has clothed me with the garments of salvation, He has covered me with the robe of righteousness, As a bridegroom decks himself with ornaments, And as a bride adorns herself with her jewels.

Ephesians 2:8-10 8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, 9 not of works, lest anyone should boast. 10 For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.

Romans 5:1 1 Therefore, having been justified by faith, we have[a] peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,

The mathematical equation does not match your second line. This, as I mentioned before, is a definitional error. If we take Paul's more broad view of faith, (he does, by the way, sometimes uses a more narrow definition, which makes Paul a bit more confusing sometimes) I think we Catholics can agree on much of what you said. A man is saved by faith IF we define faith as one that is displayed by works of love, repentance, hope, and perseverance. We will be judged by what we DO - in other words, our faith working in love (says Paul in Galatians). However, when we use James more narrow definition of faith in James 2, where works MUST be added to be salvific, then we cannot say that faith alone saves. James absolutely and positively denies this. Thus, without works of love, NO ONE will be saved.

And naturally, if we include works of love and perseverance into the definition of faith, we COULD say that faith "alone" saves... However, it is telling to note that Scriptures NEVER says this... Thus, we shouldn't use such a formula, either.

You have left out the most important thing, the reason why Jesus died on the cross. If they did these things to earn salvation, then they have rejected the righteousness of God. If they did these things as a result of faith, then they are under Grace and have given evidence that their faith is not dead and they are saved. Faith comes first, and it is of faith that we receive the righteousness of God.

We should say that faith working in love saves... As nothing else matters (Gal 5:6)

francisdesales, since you quoted Galatians, i'll ask you what Paul asked the Galatians.

Did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?

Having begun in the Spirit, are you now being made perfect by the flesh?

Righteousness Imputed
http://www.bible-topics.com/Righteousness-Imputed.html

Romans 4:13 For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith.

Romans 9:30 What shall we say then? That the Gentiles, which followed not after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness which is of faith.

Romans 3:21-22 But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets; 22 Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference:

Romans 10:4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.

Romans 4:5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.

Romans 4:11 And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised: that he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also:

Romans 4:24 But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead;

Romans 9:32 Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumblingstone;

Romans 10:3 For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.

Romans 3:24 Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:

Titus 3:7 That being justified by his grace, we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life.

Romans 4:4 Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt.

Romans 11:6 And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.

Galatians 5:4 Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.

When you put it all together...

Grace = Faith = imputed righteousness = justification = good works/fruit.

That's the only way it all fit's together. It fits together perfectly, as the truth should.

Peace.
 
Back
Top