Doulos Iesou
Member
Yes, this was the sacrifice they were to give.Sorry, I misread your post. What I meant was that Paul told the Gentiles in the first century to continue to offer at least some sacrifices, including the Passover sacrifice. The Passover lamb was not an atontement for sin. It was a peace offering. Peace offerings were not required, but were completely voluntary. My understanding is that such voluntary offerings would be allowed for Gentile Christians, if they had access to the temple and there were priests to make the offerings. They would however not be required. I apologize for the misunderstanding.
The TOG
I appeal to you therefore, brothers, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship. Romans 12:1 (ESV)
Christians were not to do animal sacrifices, in Hebrews the author explains that these were simply a sacrifice and shadow.
(which is symbolic for the present age). According to this arrangement, gifts and sacrifices are offered that cannot perfect the conscience of the worshiper, but deal only with food and drink and various washings, regulations for the body imposed until the time of reformation. Hebrews 9:9-10 (ESV)
These regulations imposed by the Law of Moses were only until the time of reformation, which is the coming of the Messiah who is Jesus.
For since the law has but a shadow of the good things to come instead of the true form of these realities, it can never, by the same sacrifices that are continually offered every year, make perfect those who draw near. Hebrews 10:1 (ESV)
If the Law, particularly these rites and rituals were but a shadow of the good things to come, then why would Paul or the other Apostles ask Christians to perform these sacrifices?
I recommend you study Hebrews, where the author talks about the insufficiency of the OT Sacrificial system and the Supremacy of Christ's New Covenant.
Blessings,
DI