Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Ok JLB i got it...
Will you post the "law of Moses" Or the chapters and verses ?
JLB where does this term come from? God's Eternal Kingdom laws are written on our heart, and do not include:
[FONT="][FONT="]Originally Posted by Jethro Bodine [/FONT]
[FONT="]Sabbath keeping doctrine says Sabbath keeping is a greater expression of the command to love God than 'love your neighbor as yourself' is. I say, scripturally, this is simply not true. In fact, not even close. Those who adhere to the Mosaic worship commands are not the only ones who believe this. It's just that the rest of us in the church have different expressions of love for God that we think are greater expressions of love for God than the command to love him by treating people nicely and with respect and being at peace with them. [/FONT]
[FONT="]The 'law' of the church today that is regarded as the most important expression of love for God is church attendance, church service, reading the Bible, prayer, baptism, operating in a gift, witnessing, giving to the church, and carefully adhering to a particular worship style and doctrinal statement. We are just as deceived as the law keeping crowd, just in regard to different expressions of the command to 'love God'. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Obedience is better than sacrifice. [/FONT]
[FONT="]And God doesn't even want the sacrifice of our worship and service unless we first obey him in being at peace with others ([/FONT][FONT="]Matthew 5:24 NIV[/FONT][FONT="]). [/FONT]
[FONT="]This seems to be the elusive truth of the church. This is what being on the narrow road that few find is all about. Love for others, including our enemies (especially?), is the great distinguishing mark between those who really do know God and those who just think they do, deceived by the sacrifice of their worship and service ([/FONT][FONT="]Matthew 7:21-23 NIV[/FONT][FONT="]) and their association with and exposure to the ways and teachings of Christ and the church ([/FONT][FONT="]Luke 13:26-27 NIV[/FONT][FONT="]). [/FONT]
[FONT="]We each have the obligation to show we really do know God and have his approval in salvation by loving others and treating them kindly, compassionately, and with respect. If we can't do that then we have to take a hard look at ourselves to see whether we really are saved or not. That's what 'making our calling and election sure' is all about. A tree is judged by it's fruit, not by it's outer adornment of leaves. The people of God seem to do well at majoring in the showy leaves of the kingdom, and not so much in bearing the fruit of the kingdom.[/FONT]
Probably the best worded and most relevant teaching I have ever read on any Christian Forum, ever.
JLB
When a person has a problem with a 's' at the end of word do you think its a good idea to add things like God's Eternal Kingdom? How about being balanced?
...when relied on for justification.The Law of Moses is a complete law [legal contract] that can not be divided up into "laws".
[FONT="][FONT="]Originally Posted by Jethro Bodine [/FONT]
[FONT="]Sabbath keeping doctrine says Sabbath keeping is a greater expression of the command to love God than 'love your neighbor as yourself' is. I say, scripturally, this is simply not true. In fact, not even close. Those who adhere to the Mosaic worship commands are not the only ones who believe this. It's just that the rest of us in the church have different expressions of love for God that we think are greater expressions of love for God than the command to love him by treating people nicely and with respect and being at peace with them. [/FONT]
[FONT="]The 'law' of the church today that is regarded as the most important expression of love for God is church attendance, church service, reading the Bible, prayer, baptism, operating in a gift, witnessing, giving to the church, and carefully adhering to a particular worship style and doctrinal statement. We are just as deceived as the law keeping crowd, just in regard to different expressions of the command to 'love God'. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Obedience is better than sacrifice. [/FONT]
[FONT="]And God doesn't even want the sacrifice of our worship and service unless we first obey him in being at peace with others ([/FONT][FONT="]Matthew 5:24 NIV[/FONT][FONT="]). [/FONT]
[FONT="]This seems to be the elusive truth of the church. This is what being on the narrow road that few find is all about. Love for others, including our enemies (especially?), is the great distinguishing mark between those who really do know God and those who just think they do, deceived by the sacrifice of their worship and service ([/FONT][FONT="]Matthew 7:21-23 NIV[/FONT][FONT="]) and their association with and exposure to the ways and teachings of Christ and the church ([/FONT][FONT="]Luke 13:26-27 NIV[/FONT][FONT="]). [/FONT]
[FONT="]We each have the obligation to show we really do know God and have his approval in salvation by loving others and treating them kindly, compassionately, and with respect. If we can't do that then we have to take a hard look at ourselves to see whether we really are saved or not. That's what 'making our calling and election sure' is all about. A tree is judged by it's fruit, not by it's outer adornment of leaves. The people of God seem to do well at majoring in the showy leaves of the kingdom, and not so much in bearing the fruit of the kingdom.[/FONT]
Probably the best worded and most relevant teaching I have ever read on any Christian Forum, ever.[/FONT]
JLB
JLB where does this term come from? God's Eternal Kingdom laws are written on our heart, and do not include:
31 "Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah-- 32 not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt, My covenant which they broke, though I was a husband to them, says the Lord. 33 But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord: I will put My law in their minds, and write it on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. Jeremiah 31:31-33
Right. The WAY of fulfilling those eternal laws was temporary, most of which could only be kept in the Land. How does this make the requirements of the law of Moses themselves (the eternal requirement for Rest, the eternal requirement for blood, the eternal requirement for love, etc.) somehow also included in the temporary aspects of the law of Moses?
We read in Hebrews how the old WAY of keeping the Day of Atonement is no longer needed because it was temporary, and that Christ is the fulfillment of the requirements of the Day of Atonement, not a new law of atonement. The old WAY of the Day of Atonement is laid aside NOT THE DAY OF ATONEMENT ITSELF, giving way to the new WAY the requirement for a Day of Atonement is kept, through faith in Christ, not through the letter of the written code (Romans 7:6 NIV). I challenge you to use those very scriptures in Hebrews to prove me wrong.
The WAY of the law of Moses was added. Even you're acknowledging that it isn't the fundamental requirements of the law of Moses that were added. It is THE WAY THOSE ETERNAL LAWS WERE TO BE FULFILLED that got temporarily added.
You are so utterly and completely wrong.God's Eternal Kingdom laws are written on our heart, and do not include:
Sacrificing animals
Levitical priesthood
Food laws
Feast days
Killing people that don't keep the Sabbath
Utterly destroying our enemies
Temple
ALL of these continue to be fulfilled to this very day, and will be in the future. But you won't get it if you continue to only think in the rut of the indoctrination of law in the church today.
What you are arguing for, and don't actually realize, is the truths these things represent are eternal kingdom truths, and that it is the WAY these things are kept that was added temporarily and then laid aside, NOT THE TRUTH BEING UPHELD.
No, brother.
You don't get to sidestep and ignore the discussion that you started with the scripture you quoted -
You haven't acknowledged it because you decided to violate plain grammatical
sense and redefine 'law', the one that gets upheld, in the last part of this
verse: "31 Do we, then, nullify the law by this faith? Not at all!
Rather, we uphold the law." (Romans
http://biblia.com/bible/niv/Romans 3.313:31 NIV)
You have been shown that verse 31 does not apply to those who are NOT under the law of Moses.
"those"who are not under the law, are not in the context of verse 31.
You yourself have chosen to violate the clear context of what Paul is saying, and have wrongly applied verse 31 to include those who are not under the law of Moses.
Now you intend to start another subject, based on your faulty premise of Romans 3:31 and continue to belabor and invalid point.
Furthermore, you added words such as "requirements", and phrases such as "the way we keep the law", when scripture makes no such mention of these words and phrases that you wrongly assume, because of your faulty understanding of Paul's letter to the Romans.
Please acknowledge that you now understand that Paul is not referring to Gentile Christians in Romans 3:31 "upholding the Law", but rather those who are under the law.
JLB
Try Romans 6.14; Galatians 5.18
Blessings.
Look at verse 31:You don't get to sidestep and ignore the discussion that you started with the scripture you quoted -
You haven't acknowledged it because you decided to violate plain grammatical
sense and redefine 'law', the one that gets upheld, in the last part of this
verse: "31 Do we, then, nullify the law by this faith? Not at all!
Rather, we uphold the law." (Romans
http://biblia.com/bible/niv/Romans 3.313:31 NIV)
You have been shown that verse 31 does not apply to those who are NOT under the law of Moses.
"those"who are not under the law, are not in the context of verse 31.
You yourself have chosen to violate the clear context of what Paul is saying, and have wrongly applied verse 31 to include those who are not under the law of Moses.
Now you intend to start another subject, based on your faulty premise of Romans 3:31 and continue to belabor and invalid point.
Furthermore, you added words such as "requirements", and phrases such as "the way we keep the law", when scripture makes no such mention of these words and phrases that you wrongly assume, because of your faulty understanding of Paul's letter to the Romans.
Please acknowledge that you now understand that Paul is not referring to Gentile Christians in Romans 3:31 "upholding the Law", but rather those who are under the law.
JLB
Look at verse 31:You don't get to sidestep and ignore the discussion that you started with the scripture you quoted -
You haven't acknowledged it because you decided to violate plain grammatical
sense and redefine 'law', the one that gets upheld, in the last part of this
verse: "31 Do we, then, nullify the law by this faith? Not at all!
Rather, we uphold the law." (Romans
http://biblia.com/bible/niv/Romans 3.313:31 NIV)
You have been shown that verse 31 does not apply to those who are NOT under the law of Moses.
"those"who are not under the law, are not in the context of verse 31.
You yourself have chosen to violate the clear context of what Paul is saying, and have wrongly applied verse 31 to include those who are not under the law of Moses.
Now you intend to start another subject, based on your faulty premise of Romans 3:31 and continue to belabor and invalid point.
Furthermore, you added words such as "requirements", and phrases such as "the way we keep the law", when scripture makes no such mention of these words and phrases that you wrongly assume, because of your faulty understanding of Paul's letter to the Romans.
Please acknowledge that you now understand that Paul is not referring to Gentile Christians in Romans 3:31 "upholding the Law", but rather those who are under the law.
JLB
"31 Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law." (Romans 3:31 KJV)
Based on the context just prior to this, do you agree that Paul is saying this...
"Do we then make void the law (of works) through (the law of) faith? God forbid..." (parentheses mine)
(I purposely left off the 'law' that you disagree with me about, the last one. We'll get to that next.)
Do you agree that the context supports the additions of what I put in parentheses?
The sentence only makes grammatical sense according to what I say 'law' means in the sentence, not what you say it does.
Okay, it seems, then, you agree that the 'law' that gets upheld is indeed the very law of Moses. Paul is saying that faith, as opposed to law, is what upholds the law. And, obviously, that only makes sense as meaning the WAY of faith upholds the (requirements of) the law.Look at verse 31:
"31 Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law." (Romans 3:31 KJV)
Based on the context just prior to this, do you agree that Paul is saying this...
"Do we then make void the law (of works) through (the law of) faith? God forbid..." (parentheses mine)
(I purposely left off the 'law' that you disagree with me about, the last one. We'll get to that next.)
Do you agree that the context supports the additions of what I put in parentheses?
The sentence only makes grammatical sense according to what I say 'law' means in the sentence, not what you say it does.
29 Or is He the God of the Jews only? Is He not also the God of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also, 30 since there is one God who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith. 31 Do we then make void the law through faith? Certainly not! On the contrary, we establish the law. Romans 3:29-31
What I have said, I will say again.
The "we" in verse 31 refers to those who are under the Law, meaning Jews.
Now we know that whatever the law says, it says to those who are under the law
"We", in verse 31 does not include Gentile Christians, "upholding the law".
JLB
Okay, it seems, then, you agree that the 'law' that gets upheld is indeed the very law of Moses. Paul is saying that faith, as opposed to law, is what upholds the law. And, obviously, that only makes sense as meaning the WAY of faith upholds the (requirements of) the law. Which is what the obedience in this New Covenant is all about: being able to obey God (that is, satisfy the righteous requirements of God spelled out in the law--'do not steal', etc.) through the new WAY of faith in Christ, not in the old WAY of just having written words and trying to obey them in the power of the flesh, Romans 7:6. (That only arouses sin all the more putting us further under the condemnation of the law). Any objections so far?
9 What then? Are we better than they? Not at all; for we have already charged that both Jews and Greeks are all under sin; 10 as it is written,
I won't say another word until you tell me what you think I mean 'upholding the law' means.Gentiles were never required to keep the Law of Moses, even when it was in force.
Now that the Seed has come and fulfilled the Law, which was a shadow of good things to come, are you now saying that Gentile Christians are required to uphold the law of Moses?
I won't say another word until you tell me what you think I mean 'upholding the law' means.Gentiles were never required to keep the Law of Moses, even when it was in force.
Now that the Seed has come and fulfilled the Law, which was a shadow of good things to come, are you now saying that Gentile Christians are required to uphold the law of Moses?
So, what do you think I mean when I say faith upholds the law of Moses? Describe for me what you think I am saying 'upholding the law' looks like in the life of the believer.
I'm not even reading the rest of your post until you help me know what you think I've been saying about this. I don't have time to continue a discussion you can not hear because you missed this fundamental point of my argument.
Deb, feel free to answer the question, too, please.
JLB, you're probably busy constructing a rebuttal, and that's fine (this may well be my favorite subject to talk about).
I won't say another word until you tell me what you think I mean 'upholding the law' means.Gentiles were never required to keep the Law of Moses, even when it was in force.
Now that the Seed has come and fulfilled the Law, which was a shadow of good things to come, are you now saying that Gentile Christians are required to uphold the law of Moses?
So, what do you think I mean when I say faith upholds the law of Moses? Describe for me what you think I am saying 'upholding the law' looks like in the life of the believer.
I'm not even reading the rest of your post until you help me know what you think I've been saying about this. I don't have time to continue a discussion you can not hear because you missed this fundamental point of my argument.
Deb, feel free to answer the question, too, please.
JLB, you're probably busy constructing a rebuttal, and that's fine (this may well be my favorite subject to talk about).
It was your favorite subject until your "airtight" irrefutable scripture that you have based your doctrine on, was shown to be exempt from the whole discussion because it doesn't pertain to you or I or Gentiles.
It pertains to those who are under the law, as Paul used this legal argument to prove his point.
It doesn't matter what I think you mean by 'upholding the law'.
It doesn't have any relevance because it is a moot point.
Gentile Christians were never "under the law", and therefore not required to uphold or establish the Law of Moses.
If you would like to discuss the topic of this thread further, then please do so.
I love what you wrote earlier as I re-posted it to show how much I appreciate what you wrote, and the relevance it carries for us today.
However, the fact is, The Law and Prophets is not a reference to the law of Moses.
On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets." Matthew 22:40
JLB