Agreed. It is a contradiction for one to believe one's belief is inferior to anothers' belief.
Example: You believe your beliefs, anywhere they differ from mine, are superior to my belief.
Hi FF,
I don't know that inferior and superior are the words to use about one's belief.
I'd say that they're different.
I DO believe that calvinist believers think they're beliefs are SUPERIOR than other's beliefs.
This is because they feel they can believe in a God others cannot accept.
This is a general concept and when I mention them I do NOT mean that YOU necessarily feel this way.
This is a falsehood. Perhaps you didn't articulate your thought precisely. Perhaps you meant to say that reform doctrines' idea of God's love, mercy and justice differ from yours.
No. I'm very careful about what I say....
I MEANT that calvinism teaches a God that is the opposite of what He is.
Calvinism teaches a God that is
UNLOVING
UNMERCIFUL
UNJUST
If you believe this to be the opposite you'll have to explain why to me.
Do YOU believe God picks and chooses who will be saved and who be damned?
If you do...then HOW is that a God of love, mercy or justice?
Your interpretation of God's love from a reformed viewpoint has a majority of those He loves ending up in hell. Your definition of God's love is unholy as you would have God love the son's of Satan (John 8:44) (my opinion, I know you think very, very highly of God)
Reform interpretation God's love has having 100.0000% of those He loves with the love of complacency being with Him (In Christ) forever. (John 6:39)
How does John 8:44 teach that God loves the sons of satan?
John 6:39 is questionable as some theologians believe it means that everything God gave Jesus to do, Jesus will complete.
IOW,,,it's speaking abouth THINGS and not PERSONS.
Even if it is speaking about persons...God calls everyone to Himself,,,,
those that reply will be saved and see eternal life on the Day of the Lord.
God calls everyone:
Acts 17:27-31
27that
they would seek God, if perhaps they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us;
28for in Him we live and move and exist, as even some of your own poets have said, ‘For we also are His children.’
29“Being then the children of God, we ought not to think that the Divine Nature is like gold or silver or stone, an image formed by the art and thought of man.
30“Therefore having overlooked the times of ignorance,
God is now declaring to men that all people everywhere should repent,
31because He has fixed a day in which
He will judge the world in righteousness through a Man whom He has appointed
, having furnished proof to all men by raising Him from the dead.”
This is empirically untrue. God does not offer salvation to those that have not heard the gospel (faith cometh by hearing). I know you disagree, but that is a minority arminian opinion. (not that that necessarily proves you wrong). You also believe in unconditional election for those that do not reach the age of accountability.
No Fastfredy...
YOU believe in unconditional election.
I believe in conditional election.
Election is conditional for those not reaching the age of accountability because they have not yet offended God personally.
They are not guilty of personal sin, but only suffer from the effect of Adam's sin.
Adam's sin IS NOT imputed to us.
As to faith coming by hearing...
I believe that faith comes by hearing the word of God.
I just also believe some could believe in God by having a desire for God in their heart (if they have no access to hearing).
Again, God passes over those that did not hear the gospel. He also passes over all those that may have become believers but were not afforded that chance due to a premature death (i.e. Pol Pot, Stalin, Hilter)
Reform doctrine believes God is ALWAYS just. There is not one person in hell that does not deserve it. God was not obligated to save one person. The fact that He saves any shows His mercy.
Explain to me how God is a just God that does not give to EVERYONE the equal opportunity of being saved.
You may believe God is always just...but HOW is He just?
Would a human judge send you to your death for having done NOTHING?
How much more just should God be?
The fact that God saves ANY is a sign of INJUSTICE,,,not justice.
To be a just God,,,,He would have to give the same love and mercy to ALL MEN...
not just to a select few.
The fact that He saves any is proof of injustice.
Think about this carefully.
Proverbs 8:4
Verse Concepts
“To you, O men, I call,
And my voice is to the sons of men.
Isaiah 45:22
Verse Concepts
“Turn to Me and be saved, all the ends of the earth;
For I am God, and there is no other.
Isaiah 55:1
Verse Concepts
“Ho! Every one who thirsts, come to the waters;
And you who have no money come, buy and eat.
Come, buy wine and milk
Without money and without cost.
Matthew 11:28-30
“Come to Me, all who are weary and heavy-laden, and I will give you rest. Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For My yoke is easy and My burden is light.”
Matthew 22:9
Go therefore to the main highways, and as many as you find there, invite to the wedding feast.’
John 7:37
Verse Concepts
Now on the last day, the great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried out, saying, “If anyone is thirsty, let him come to Me and drink.
And he said to them, “Go into all the world and proclaim the gospel to the whole creation.
RE:
Long story ... suffice it to say that in a previous post you yourself said one should never depend on the words ALL and EVERYONE. I agree.
I never said that one should not depend on the words ALL and EVERYONE.....
All means All
and Everyone means Everyone
What I was saying is that we never would say EVERYONE WAS DRUNK...there could have been a few that were not.
This is a totally different concept and goes into English grammar and not biblical study so I would end it here.
Aside: I know you love God greatly and therefore despise anyone doctrine that contradicts your perception of truth in connection with God. I admire you zealousness for God.
Unfortunately FF,,, it's not MY perception of truth.
The Apostles, the Apostolic Fathers and the Early Church Fathers (the first 300 to 400 years after Jesus' resurrection) had
no concept of predestination or the idea that a person could not have free will.
These ideas were introduced in the 1,500's. Quite some time after Jesus' death.
R.C. Sproul (reformed theologian) .... I know I have mistakes in my theology, I just don't know what they are (not an exact quote). I'm with Sproul. Only thing I know for sure is a lot of people got it terribly wrong, many have it wrong, some may be close, none have it all correct (where the quantitative assessment of "wrong" has a subjective definition).
*ponders* I wonder if God looks down at poor me and says, "Freddie got it wrong again (as I predestined)"
I do agree with the above concerning DOCTRINE.
However, calvinism is not a doctrine,,,it's theology.
The study of God.
Has Calvin understood God properly?
I say it has not, as does every other Christian denomination except the reformed.
There must be a reason why.