Paul had no issues whatsoever with believers who worshipped on a certain day in accordance with the LAW or didn't eat pork as matter of their own conscience, thinking that they were or were not 'legal' requirements.
No one is required to 'sin' against the dictates of their conscience.
If the Law says do not murder or steal and we do not do so as a matter of Law or of conscience and see also those being 'legal' matters there are no critical issues with those actions to the believers denigrations.
Why the press to cast down the Law when Paul concludes the exact opposite is again not a requirement.
Those who love their neighbors as themselves are fulfilling the LAW in themselves with every spiritual intention of same. And it is the SAME LAW that also proves beyond all doubt that 'all' are sinners.
There is a principle in the text that
LIGHT does shine from darkness, and the LAW shows this to be a fact. It does NOT have to be a 'one way or the other' deal.
Both positions are SIMULTANEOUSLY TRUE. There are SINNERS who are also LEGALLY OBEDIENT to the spiritual intentions of the Law.
The Law itself is not an easy matter to come into dealings with. There is zero doubt that it aggravates and arouses the workings of sin, in part to make 'all' who are at least honest within themselves to know that
SIN is a present and working fact in this regards. Anyone with a 'conscience' knows this as well, even without the Law.
There is no uncertainty that the Law is spiritual. There are however a lot of phony caricatures of the Law that are held up 'as' the Law. I might debate that the law is NOT about Saturday Sabbath or NOT eating pork, but if someone fulfilled the spiritual intentions of the law by loving their neighbors as themselves and also chose to do the others, (which is most unlikely as most who are legal in this way are NOT legal in spiritual intentions) there would be no issues with them following those conscience dictates.
Paul openly 'followed the Law' whenever it suited him to do so. He had Timothy circumcised and adhered to a certain Jewish ritual to prove to Jews he was still legal. Paul saw the same principles and taught them in this way.
The notion and promotion that there is a requirement for christians to cast aside the Law
is simply not true when the fulfillment of same is presented in Romans 13:8-10 and in other places in the N.T.
What is very bizarre, even quite weird, is listening to you whine about the Law
and then make these kinds of statements:
However you derived your 'compliance' those are in fact LEGAL matters.
Any believer who understands that the SIN they have as a fact and carry as a fact is and remains condemned under the LAW and also by The Spirit of Christ in them loves their neighbors as themselves will know the Law in a more intimate way if they know that BOTH of these matters are 'simultaneously' true.
I happen to be much pickier about the law, knowing that the 'mere thought' of stealing or murder or any other thought of lawlessness is in fact SIN showing it's ugly head to be a continuing fact within me.
That does NOT stop the Spirit of Christ in me from loving my neighbors as myself.
And if I would be taken PREY by the workings of SIN into lawlessness, then there is a PRICE to be paid in this present life.
Galatians 6:7
Be not deceived;
God is not mocked: for
whatsoever a man soweth,
that shall he also reap.
We 'all' reap DEATH sooner or later because of the presence of sin. There is no use whistling past the graveyard on this fact that the Law shows and proves.
A believer has less interest in being 'gamed and pawned' by that working.
s