atpollard
Member
- Nov 30, 2016
- 1,920
- 528
- Thread starter
- #721
Actually, it was an example of an unanswerable question. Not because the question has no answer ("I have never beat my wife") but because the way the question is constructed "Have you stopped beating your wife" makes assumptions (that I formerly beat my wife) which are invalid, rendering any answer to the question (YES or NO) equally false.More ad hominem with no answer or scripture.
It was intended to illustrate that your question "Why would God need to Reform the doctrine of Christ?" is equally invalid because it makes invalid assumptions:
- God needs to reform the doctrine of Christ.
- The Doctrine of Christ needed reforming.
- The REFORMERS (whom you were actually attacking) were attempting to reform the doctrine of Christ.
Like this:
John 6:44
- No one can come to Me [Total Inability of man to choose Christ]
- unless the Father who sent Me [Unconditional Election of God to 'show mercy on whom He will show mercy']
- draws him; [Irresistible Grace of God effectually draws man to salvation in the Son]
- and I will raise him up at the last day. [Preservation of Saints, by God, from Predestination through Glorification.]