Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Born Again?

To anyone interested, Nicodemus asked how a person can enter a second time into his mother’s womb in direct response to Jesus using my the phrase “unless one is born again”.



Jesus answered and said to him, “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.”
Nicodemus said to Him, “How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter a second time into his mother’s womb and be born?” John 3:3-4




This seems very clear that Jesus used the phrase “born again”, otherwise Nicodemus would not have answered with,
“Can he enter a second time into his mother’s womb and be born?”




Very simple.




JLB
 
How is someone born of scripture?
JLB
It's a metaphor... like most things scriptural. Can you not understand this? It's a word picture.

StoveBolts
2Peter:
For when they maintain this, it escapes their notice that by the word of God the heavens existed long ago and the earth was formed out of water and by water,

Ephesians:
To make her holy, cleansing her by the washing with water through the word


Isaiah 57:20
But the wicked are like the tossing sea, For it cannot be quiet, And its waters toss up refuse and mud."


Water is some type of law. The context and use tells us what type of law. The type has direct references to types of water. The laws of the wicked/unsaved are pure chaos.

The Laws of God are like silver refined seven times. (Psalms)...57? 59? Can't remember.

So when we see Jesus telling Nicodemus that he is born of water (God's Laws) and the Holy Spirit ...and is Called and Chosen to do things for God... and it dawns on Nicodemus that in the same fashion as God behaved after the sealing of friendship with Abraham, Jesus is acting now... Jesus is God.
 
It's a metaphor... like most things scriptural. Can you not understand this? It's a word picture.


You gave me your perspective.


Ok. So be it.


I asked you to explain your perspective.



How is someone born of the scriptures.



Is there any reality to your theory.



Your claim is “born of water” is a (parabolic) reference to born of the scriptures.

The law of the Torah to be exact.


That means the word picture is “born of water” and the reality that the “word picture” refers to is “born of the scriptures.”



So I ask you how someone is born of the scriptures?




JLB
 
Reposting the two posts from before...just so JLB can't claim he has read them but is really ignoring them and claim I've posted nothing in the meantime
AND
So wondering can find them as well

Lets consider some facts from a completely inductive method.

This is the Gospel of John.
John has several themes that run rampant throughout his Gospel. Most of these themes directly address theological arguments of the day and time of Jesus' ministry tour and subsequent fallout.

Some of these themes are outlined in his first Chapter which include:
The identity of Jesus.
The identity of those who follow Jesus (Bene Elohim...John 1:12)

So...If the most likely language that the action took place in was Aramaic then the most likely thing said wasn't in Greek and the Gospel of John (which is actually in Early Latin which is mostly Koine Greek) has been translated by John to begin with. And in fact some of the Oldest Aramaic translations of the New Testament Gospel of John have an expression which is "men derish". Where this expression does have a double entendre of "born again" the primary meaning was "Born from Above" which fits more precisely with one of the Themes of the Gospel of John. Rebirth is more in fitting with Greek Grammar....but John didn't say that Jesus said this...so obviously "Men Derish" is the most likely expression used by Jesus who most definitely had a way with words.

Jesus often taught using prose of some form...Nicodemus' visit and subsequent lesson wouldn't be any exception to the rule. It would mean that the lessons would be more focused and Nicodemus would be at his limit of trying to keep up with the rapid fire lessons and explanations. But as a learned man Nicodemus could drink from a fire hose if necessary...and with Jesus it most definitely be necessary.

All of the Gospels showed a trait of Jesus...a very telling trait.
Anybody who recognized Jesus as being sent by God was instantly rewarded. Anybody who asked Jesus for a miracle received one. Anybody who referred to Jesus as The Son of God especially received a miracle.

Nicodemus came during the evening hours. Which actually is Social Hour in Israel. These guys stay up late! I found it baffling myself as a normal "early riser". When the party boat on the Sea of Gallilee was playing Bon Jovi and other '80's tunes past 11pm it was a tad annoying. Hey, I like Ozzy too...but not at that time of night when all I want to do is sleep. The disco ball was a bit much imho but hey...its their place not mine.

Now Nicodemus came recognizing Jesus' miracles and teaching as being legitimate. Thats in direct defiance of most of the Pharisees and Sadducees and "experts in the Law" aka Grammitons.

Now according to
Moses ben Maimon commonly known as Maimonides there were two different groups of "heroes". And as Israel was known for being a caste based society it should be of special notice. Maimonides came from the 1100's AD...not exactly from that day and time of the action of the Gospel...and he was most definitely Jewish practicing Judaism. He wasn't exactly wrong...but trying to diffuse the huge impact that Christianity had upon the Jewish world. So...relating the truth without being more precise was definitely in his best interests. (He was considered a Polymath or Renaissance Man. Now Maimonides refers to two different groups of "heroes".

The Hassid or Saint
The Hakham or Sage...

Now this is a close approximation of what has been suggested of Anthropologists. The Jews were a meticulous bunch. Everyone and everything had to be categorized. Even the Heroes of Old.
Sometimes God, having pity upon Israel's misery or in keeping with Promises that God had made to Israel, sent different heroes to perform very specific tasks.
Now when someone was a great teacher they were a Hakham...or wise person that everyone listened to...we would generally refer to this person roughly as a Sage. It was more than that as this person could also be an advisor to the King...as in what Joseph did with Pharaoh. Or as in a Judge as described in the book of Judges. Which was half prophet and half leader. Which really isn't exactly what a "Judge" was but more in line with what we think of as a Judge.
Then there are the Hassid or Saint. These guys were men of Action...like Moses or Sampson or Jacob or Isaac or many others I could list here. One of the prerequisites was that they were not just Called but Chosen and that these people were prophesied about before they were born. These "Sons of God" were considered to be very holy and righteous men. Samuel could be sarcastic at times...but like often is the case no one thinks of a "Hero" as being sarcastic when he should be respectful. And "of course the Bible contains no such sarcasm or dry wit being performed by the Heroes".


This notion of a lack of sarcastic comments and dry wit are of course false.

No one even considers the fact that Nicodemus, who recognized Jesus as being sent by God, would be sarcastic to a bona fide messenger of God. And likely he wouldn't be.

But that doesn't mean that Jesus wouldn't be a bit incredulous at Nicodemus' answer back to him.

As the scripture above in for_his_glory 's post shows the conversation...
Lets assume for just a moment that Tyndale nor Erasmus were not correct. And that Jerome was busy pontificating upon the less known double entendre of what Jesus said instead of the main thing people would understand from "born from above" or Born Anew.

What could the Jesus who spoke in parables so that the Pharisees deliberately would not understand what he was saying actually saying? And what could Nicodemus' reply actually mean?

Not that I actually am trying to promote a notion of Calvinism of Election...but a notion of Predestination of having foreknowledge from a God who knows the end of things as well as He knows the Beginning of all things.
The very notion that Nicodemus understood really well of being not just Called but Chosen by God to be a Hassid/Saint and not just a Hakham/Sage or knowledgeable person. Someone who was "Bene Elohim" and was deliberately born of God to perform a very specific task for All of Israel.

Jesus said, "No one can see the Kingdom of God unless he is a Bene Elohim/Born Anew/Born as a messenger with a task to benefit ALL OF ISRAEL...like Moses, Isaac, or Sampson. Nor could they recognize the King.

As a member of the Sanhidrin, a religious leader, and Rabbi/teacher of the Masses this would seem like empty flattery that Nicodemus did not understand how he could possibly satisfy...even with the double entendre of meaning that Nicodemus would understand half of. (The repenting and becoming a "Child of Abraham" once again. because he was a Rabbi...repenting of a mispent life was not on his agenda...nor did he need to. He was the interpreter of the Law and followed it closely)

This prompted the question that Nicodemus had of how he could possibly do his whole life over again at this point in the game. He would need to. So that his birth could be foretold by prophets, and all of Israel could look forward to his life changing the lives of everyone in Israel.
Now the term Jesus used was a backhanded way of saying Bene Elohim but not THE Son of God which was reserved for the Messiah...and Jesus wanted to make that distinction clear. Jesus knew exactly who he was...and was busy explaining to Nicodemus, who stopped by to make a friend of Jesus, who he truly was.

The answer petrified Nicodemus right down to his core more so than an entire legion of Roman soldiers coming to arrest him ever could. "There's no way possible" comes to mind when being told something like this. I'm sure this was Nicodemus' first thought. One that kept repeating itself through his mind.

While Jesus explains the same lesson he explained about the Sower and the different soils...or in the Old Testament about the Potter and the Clay. The better the quality of the soil the better the harvest or the better the quality of the clay the better the quality of the finished vessel.
That Nicodemus had been born of water and Spirit...

Water...its a backhanded, metaphoric reference to Law.
Moses started this with the sprinkling of the People with the water to cleanse them when he brought with him the "contract" of the first written words of God to the Children of Israel.

Lets look at some expressions...
Genesis
....And the Spirit of God was Hovering/Shaking/Controlling over the face of the "waters" is how scriptures say that God was choosing which laws of physics would rule the Universe.

2Peter:
The Heavens existed and the Earth was formed out of water and by water....(anything God says simply is the Law...even if you argue with it)

Wash her with the water of the Word...
More could be said but suffice it to say that the chapter divisions put into scriptures around the time people were getting access to them was deliberately done to obfuscate the reason why Jesus decided to walk upon the Tehovm/Sea/Abyss of Gallilee.

The natural chapter breaks otherwise coming from the sections of scriptures would indicate a very serious problem with the current state of things with the Holy Roman Empire's church. Nevermind the truth...we are the "good guys".

Soooo

Long and dry reading....but it does propose a more complete understanding of what was said and why it was said than anything else listed above.

and that if you happen to be reading this...you have been Called...and Chosen to do something.
 
Last edited:
Water

Lets address this water issue first...and after I do that then I will address this question of "Called and Chosen" because the two are related after a fashion. One without the other won't do you a lot of good. And your questions concerning your Baptism and behavior afterwards can be answered.

I usually use a lot of Hebrew for this explanation...And where I know that Jeff understood it I musta left out a few steps otherwise you would understand a bit better.

Hebrew is a metaphoric language and euphamisms are simply the way that they communicated. Even the characters in the language were once symbols with a particular meaning.

yam....water (singular)
mayim...waters (plural)
Hashamayim.....waters of waters (used to denote the sky)
Hashamayim hashamayim...waters of waters of waters of waters. (reserved for talking about Heaven where God lives)

Then we have different types of water.

Cysterns and stored water....can only be stored for a very limited (short) time as it will become brakish tasting. Very well could make a person sick. Had to be cut with some kind of wine to be drinkable or could possibly be used to make beer...depending upon the age.

Living Water,....This type of water was always considered a gift from God and it was always flowing and moving. (rivers and creeks and springs) It could be the heavy dews that existed in particular times of year that would be heavy enough to water the ground and make the grass grow (often seen in Judah's territory for the Sheep to graze upon also used as a medium of communication in Gideon's tale...) All "Mikveh" were to be fed by living water. It didn't have to move very fast but it must flow. A Mikveh was the ceremonial "bathtub" that was used for the priests to wash in (separate from the Bronze Sea) before putting on the ceremonial robes of office when working in the Temple.

Sea...Abyss...Tehovm. It was what happened to water after man and the unforgiving Earth was finished using it. All water flows into the sea. It washes the "sin" away of the Land and man and carries with it the sin...into the abyss. The "Sea" was always in a state of chaos...always tossing and turning. The wicked are like the sea: Yes, there is no rest for the wicked says the Spirit of the Lord. (Isaiah)
Remember how Jesus walked upon the "Tehovm of Gallilee"? And then the stories relate how Jesus went about breaking some of the Pharisees favorite rules, customs, and Laws.
He was symbolizing his contempt for what the Israelites had done to the Laws that he had given them and then broke a ton of them. They even had a rule about measuring the water for ceremonially washing your hands before you ate.

Water as a symbol "type" of laws or rules can be as loose as a custom or a tradition (Grandpa always carves the lamb at Passover) and vary from household to household or as codified and detailed out as the 613 rules in the "Book of the Law" or Torah. And Jesus went to town on the Pharisees about how their rules created chaos on a regular basis. Context of what is being spoken about always clears up as to which set of laws Jesus or Peter or whomever is speaking about when "water" is used in such a fashion. Of course anytime God speaks it is instant LAW...no argument will be brooked with what God says. (See the scriptures above in a previous post when I speak about water and see how clearly and concisely this explanation fits)

When Jesus said that Nicodemus was "born of water" he meant that Nicodemus had to be born Jewish in order to learn all of God's laws for Holy Living. He had to be born into a household that taught, encouraged and enforced all of God's laws.

When we are Baptized the Pastor usually (but not always) says, "Buried with Christ in Baptism, Raised to walk in Newness of Life"
The Law demands our death for violating the Law...and Christ died for us so that we might have eternal life. The Law convicts us of our treason against our Creator. Being immersed in the Law shows us how we must die for our sins (which are very often very many)

Now to be Called...
Lets look for a minute at Abraham. We could choose from many of the Heroes of Old but he is handy for this one.

First thing that Abraham knew was that he was Called...like many people are. And because Abraham believed God and answered that Call (to leave his homeland and travel west to a Land that God would show him) Abraham became Chosen to be God's friend.

Sampson was Called and Chosen to relieve Philistine oppression of the Israelites before he was born. (What Jesus was saying about Nicodemus) Just like Moses was Called and Chosen to bring the Israelites out of misery (Egypt)

Now...when we come to the passage where Jesus says, "Many are Called but few are Chosen" He is talking about something a bit different.

Now Jesus has already made clear by teaching in Parables that He flat out doesn't want the masses of Israel to turn and be saved. He has rejected them for some very specific reasons. And in the passages leading up to the point where Jesus uses this very "troublesome" phrase it is very clear that these guys who are volunteering to become Telmuhdeem/disciples/Apostles are more enticed by the position of "Following a Rabbi" because they are educated and have succeeded in BethMidrash than they are actually in Jesus himself. Which brings Jesus to say what he said about many being Called but only a few Chosen. Jesus was interested in having them follow...but not to become one of the 12 future leaders.

Now...for the shift in focus here from what was thought to what is now true.
When Nicodemus came to Jesus at night to try and befriend him...he is asking Jesus to be his friend. (without such a dorky question being asked formally)

Lets take a step back and then come back to this.
Abraham served a meal to God. This meal serving is actually a covenant. It symbolizes a peace treaty between the two men. (read about the Gibeonite deception in Joshua) This is why later Abraham became known as God's friend. And today we sing "I am a friend of God's". Right after the meal God did something. He talked to himself with Abraham right there listening in the whole time...kinda speaking to himself and Abraham all at the same time.

Jesus had a habit of granting requests. Anyone who asked for something from Him it was usually granted. Even if it was on behalf of others. If you got Jesus' attention (and there were a variety of ways this could easily be...like directly calling him the Messiah) Jesus would grant you whatever favor that you requested.

So...Nicodemus requested Jesus' friendship. And Jesus then did exactly what God did after eating the meal with Abraham...talked to himself and Nicodemus at the same time.

And afterwards I am about sure that Nicodemus about pissed his pants when he realized what Jesus did and who Jesus really was. Which is one reason why Nicodemus left to go pray and meditate for a loooonnnng time. (yeah...boom)

Now for the "born of water and called and chosen all wrapped up with parables and stories out of the Old Testament....

The "Master Potter" in the Old Testament.
The quality of Clay determines the value of the object a potter can make out of it. Some clay doesn't hold together well and bakes up rather heavy and clunky...made for low rise vessels such as a chamber pot. (something you can sit on and defecate into) Other clay can go really thin and become really high vessels like a wine or oil carafe (not a jar)
The thinness and height of the clay vessel is determined by the clay being worked with. Even broken baked clay has a use to a potter because with it he can shape or carve pots and sometimes color while they are on the wheel being formed. All those broken pieces (which won't hold anything) make the high vessels even prettier and have more value. The Potter will starve to death if all he can make is a few chamber pots. He has to make a lot of pots/vessels and has to make the highest quality/priced vessels possible to get enough money to live off of.

Which brings us to Abimelech. That guy whom Abraham suckered as well as Isaac. Abimelech took Abraham's wife (as he thought it was only his sister) to become his bride...but before the marriage could take place Abimelech had a dream. God told him something. (I kept you from sinning....) IOW your sins were allowed to you to bring you back to HIM.

What God has explained in this story...and to Nicodemus is that our path in life has been carefully crafted and formed for us to perform very specific tasks. (as had Sampson's) God has Called us and Chosen us to do something very specific for Him. It may be a variety of tasks...or it can be part of a reason God is going to use us as a vessel of wrath for the things we have done. (Demonstrating why we shouldn't piss off God) Either way we get to choose a lot of things. We can choose to be angry about our path (as Sampson did) and stubborn about doing what we were made to do...or we can greet it with wide eyed wonder and excuses (as Phillip did when Jesus asked him to get some bread for the 5,000) or we can have the "Passion" as David did when he saw an opportunity to express his anger and outrage at a "son of Anak who should be dead and is blaspheming God and scaring God's army".
Because...the same thing that Elisha had seen and asked for God to open the eyes of his apprentice so he could see the same when the army had surrounded the village in the valley...that the whole valley was filled with soldiers a lot more powerful than this pitiful human army could have a chance against...is very true. What God has planned and called and chosen you to do...you will do...or all of creation will become undone.
 
How is someone born of scripture?




JLB

How is someone born of actual water?

The NT was not written when Jesus walked this earth so it is by the spoken words of Christ as being living water (His spoken words) in those scriptures I gave you about the living water being the words Christ spoke and the Apostles wrote down as a witness as they testified of Him.

Listen to what John the Baptist said that is written in Matthew 3:11 I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire:

John's baptism was for repentance as an outward appearance to others. Jesus baptizes us with the Holy Spirit. No water involved. John 3:5 never mentions the word baptism so why do others perceive it does.

In Acts 10:34-48 especially vs. 44 While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word. Vs. 47 Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?

Peter is saying it is by the word (living water/Jesus), not by water that we receive the baptism of the Holy Spirit, but yet he does not forbid anyone to be baptized in water for an outward appearance of repentance like that of John the Baptist ministry.
 
This notion of a lack of sarcastic comments and dry wit are of course false.

No one even considers the fact that Nicodemus, who recognized Jesus as being sent by God, would be sarcastic to a bona fide messenger of God. And likely he wouldn't be.

But that doesn't mean that Jesus wouldn't be a bit incredulous at Nicodemus' answer back to him.

As the scripture above in for_his_glory 's post shows the conversation...
Lets assume for just a moment that Tyndale nor Erasmus were not correct. And that Jerome was busy pontificating upon the less known double entendre of what Jesus said instead of the main thing people would understand from "born from above" or Born Anew.

What could the Jesus who spoke in parables so that the Pharisees deliberately would not understand what he was saying actually saying? And what could Nicodemus' reply actually mean?

Not that I actually am trying to promote a notion of Calvinism of Election...but a notion of Predestination of having foreknowledge from a God who knows the end of things as well as He knows the Beginning of all things.
The very notion that Nicodemus understood really well of being not just Called but Chosen by God to be a Hassid/Saint and not just a Hakham/Sage or knowledgeable person. Someone who was "Bene Elohim" and was deliberately born of God to perform a very specific task for All of Israel.

Jesus said, "No one can see the Kingdom of God unless he is a Bene Elohim/Born Anew/Born as a messenger with a task to benefit ALL OF ISRAEL...like Moses, Isaac, or Sampson.

As a member of the Sanhidrin, a religious leader, and Rabbi/teacher of the Masses this would seem like empty flattery that Nicodemus did not understand how he could possibly satisfy...even with the double entendre of meaning that Nicodemus would understand half of. (The repenting and becoming a "Child of Abraham" once again. because he was a Rabbi...repenting of a mispent life was not on his agenda...nor did he need to. He was the interpreter of the Law and followed it closely)

This prompted the question that Nicodemus had of how he could possibly do his whole life over again at this point in the game. He would need to. So that his birth could be foretold by prophets, and all of Israel could look forward to his life changing the lives of everyone in Israel.
Now the term Jesus used was a backhanded way of saying Bene Elohim but not THE Son of God which was reserved for the Messiah...and Jesus wanted to make that distinction clear. Jesus knew exactly who he was...and was busy explaining to Nicodemus, who stopped by to make a friend of Jesus, who he truly was.

The answer petrified Nicodemus right down to his core more so than an entire legion of Roman soldiers coming to arrest him ever could. "There's no way possible" comes to mind when being told something like this. I'm sure this was Nicodemus' first thought. One that kept repeating itself through his mind.

While Jesus explains the same lesson he explained about the Sower and the different soils...or in the Old Testament about the Potter and the Clay. The better the quality of the soil the better the harvest or the better the quality of the clay the better the quality of the finished vessel.
That Nicodemus had been born of water and Spirit...

Water...its a backhanded, metaphoric reference to Law.
Moses started this with the sprinkling of the People with the water to cleanse them when he brought with him the "contract" of the first written words of God to the Children of Israel.

Lets look at some expressions...
Genesis
....And the Spirit of God was Hovering/Shaking/Controlling over the face of the "waters" is how scriptures say that God was choosing which laws of physics would rule the Universe.

1Peter:
The Heavens existed and the Earth was formed out of water and by water....(anything God says simply is the Law...even if you argue with it)

Wash her with the water of the Word...
More could be said but suffice it to say that the chapter divisions put into scriptures around the time people were getting access to them was deliberately done to obfuscate the reason why Jesus decided to walk upon the Tehovm/Sea/Abyss of Gallilee.

The natural chapter breaks otherwise coming from the sections of scriptures would indicate a very serious problem with the current state of things with the Holy Roman Empire's church. Nevermind the truth...we are the "good guys".

Soooo

Long and dry reading....but it does propose a more complete understanding of what was said and why it was said than anything else listed above.

and that if you happen to be reading this...you have been Called...and Chosen to do something.
I think I understand what you are saying, like, Jeremiah.
Jer.1:5
Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee, and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nation's.

Psa.22:30,31
A seed shall serve Him, it shall be accounted to the Lord for a generation.
They shall come, and shall declare His righteousness unto a people that shall be born....

Many are called but a few chosen.
 
I think I understand what you are saying, like, Jeremiah.
Jer.1:5
Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee, and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nation's.

Psa.22:30,31
A seed shall serve Him, it shall be accounted to the Lord for a generation.
They shall come, and shall declare His righteousness unto a people that shall be born....

Many are called but a few chosen.
Except now all are "chosen" for various tasks. It may not be a leadership role except for children. It may not be a teaching role for others. It could be as simple as that slave girl telling Namaan about Elisha in Israel and how he could heal his leprosy. Or that guy driving a pickup truck who gave little Willie a ride in the bed if it to a Billy Sunday Revival...and later little Willie became Billy Graham.

Things are vastly different in this New Covenant than the Old One.
 
How is someone born of actual water?

The NT was not written when Jesus walked this earth so it is by the spoken words of Christ as being living water (His spoken words) in those scriptures I gave you about the living water being the words Christ spoke and the Apostles wrote down as a witness as they testified of Him.

Listen to what John the Baptist said that is written in Matthew 3:11 I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire:

John's baptism was for repentance as an outward appearance to others. Jesus baptizes us with the Holy Spirit. No water involved. John 3:5 never mentions the word baptism so why do others perceive it does.

In Acts 10:34-48 especially vs. 44 While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word. Vs. 47 Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?

Peter is saying it is by the word (living water/Jesus), not by water that we receive the baptism of the Holy Spirit, but yet he does not forbid anyone to be baptized in water for an outward appearance of repentance like that of John the Baptist ministry.


Every person comes into this world from their mothers womb by water.


Each person is “baptized” in this water within the womb of their mother, so to speak.


Jesus came is the only One to come into this world by both water and blood, because His mother was a virgin.



JLB
 
Every person comes into this world from their mothers womb by water.


Each person is “baptized” in this water within the womb of their mother, so to speak.


Jesus came is the only One to come into this world by both water and blood, because His mother was a virgin.



JLB

How did Jesus come into the world by blood? Is there scripture for this?

You said, "Each person is “baptized” in this water within the womb of their mother, so to speak." Can you explain this further and what amniotic fluid has to do with John the Baptist baptism for only the remission of sin?
 
Yeah I am.
Because when it comes time for the Aramaic poetry spoken by Jesus it's absolutely perfect.
Not everything is perfect with the Syriac manuscripts, nor any manuscripts. But the words of Jesus being poetic in nature when spoken in Aramaic really helps with the accuracy.

That's why I tend to rely on them the same way as the United Bible Society does. (They create a compilation of manuscripts used to create the one manuscript that all New Testament translations use to create their translation.... except for the Catholics who use a similar method but their own compilation)
Sounds reasonable...
But I don't believe scribes were very professional until the years after, maybe, the 1300's or maybe even later.
I don't trust anything 100%.
I trust the nature of Jesus.
The jist of what He taught.
And the ECFs that learned from the Apostles.

I think it's a shame the N.T. is not more clear --- but how could it be? And so we could prove different ideas from it. Even those that do not jive with the nature of Jesus, or of God, for that matter.
 
Every person comes into this world from their mothers womb by water.


Each person is “baptized” in this water within the womb of their mother, so to speak.


Jesus came is the only One to come into this world by both water and blood, because His mother was a virgin.



JLB
Respectfully, using your own words, what is baptism as a general term since it is used multiple ways in scripture, and what purpose does it serve that all baptisms have in common?
I'm not talking about the means such as full immersion etc, I'm talking about the function and "word picture" it represents (as John would put it).
 
Sounds reasonable...
But I don't believe scribes were very professional until the years after, maybe, the 1300's or maybe even later.
I don't trust anything 100%.
I trust the nature of Jesus.
The jist of what He taught.
And the ECFs that learned from the Apostles.

I think it's a shame the N.T. is not more clear --- but how could it be? And so we could prove different ideas from it. Even those that do not jive with the nature of Jesus, or of God, for that matter.
Actually, (off topic for a bit) the Masoretic community was dedicated to keeping the Old Testament (Tenakh) scriptures accurate...and distributing them freely. The Latin Vulgate became highly corrupted over the centuries and keeping up with the accurate copies of the Autographs was abandoned by the RCC. (Hence the Dark Ages)
But other areas of the Globe kept up with faithfully copying...such as the Masoretes and old copies of manuscripts "discovered". So what we have today is likely the most accurate (once you get past the denominational bias in various translations) of all except for the Autographs.
 
Every person comes into this world from their mothers womb by water.
Each person is “baptized” in this water within the womb of their mother, so to speak.

JLB
This cannot be true.
A physical process which makes the mother unclean (giving birth) cannot be utilized to create a ceremonially cleaning activity.
All three mother, midwife, and child was ceremonially unclean until cleansing rituals were performed and a time period was finished.
 
Actually, (off topic for a bit) the Masoretic community was dedicated to keeping the Old Testament (Tenakh) scriptures accurate...and distributing them freely. The Latin Vulgate became highly corrupted over the centuries and keeping up with the accurate copies of the Autographs was abandoned by the RCC. (Hence the Dark Ages)
But other areas of the Globe kept up with faithfully copying...such as the Masoretes and old copies of manuscripts "discovered". So what we have today is likely the most accurate (once you get past the denominational bias in various translations) of all except for the Autographs.
I had learned that about the Torah,,,but not the Tenakh.
I'm not familiar with the Masoretic community.
If I remember correctly,,, the letters were already corrupted while the Apostles were still alive,,,,just from copying them from one community (congregation) to another.

I DO NOT believe that they were so corrupted that we cannot know what Jesus wanted to teach or the Apostles waned to teach or the writer's wanted to teach.
 
I had learned that about the Torah,,,but not the Tenakh.

The Tenakh is the entire Old Testament...including the Apocrypha.

I'm not familiar with the Masoretic community.

A community of Jews dedicated to various things but mostly to preservation of Jewish culture especially God's word.

If I remember correctly,,, the letters were already corrupted while the Apostles were still alive,,,,just from copying them from one community (congregation) to another.
Actually that's an atheist gratuitous assertion. We actually have the "lost letters" of Paul. They are available but not really widespread. They aren't distributed because Paul says the exact same things in his "lost letters" as his well known ones but words things differently a tiny bit. And some things in his popular letters aren't mentioned in some letters but are in others. (He spent a fortune on paper and ink for a prisoner)

And the various gospels have many copies in many different parts of the globe. We have a complete bible from 300AD
AND
so many quotes in so much correspondence, literature and songs we can actually rebuild the scriptures from those things alone. (Lee Strobel Case for Creator)

I DO NOT believe that they were so corrupted that we cannot know what Jesus wanted to teach or the Apostles waned to teach or the writer's wanted to teach.

They just aren't. We have more copies of scripture than Homer's Illead...but no one seems to fuss about it.
 
The Tenakh is the entire Old Testament...including the Apocrypha.



A community of Jews dedicated to various things but mostly to preservation of Jewish culture especially God's word.


Actually that's an atheist gratuitous assertion. We actually have the "lost letters" of Paul. They are available but not really widespread. They aren't distributed because Paul says the exact same things in his "lost letters" as his well known ones but words things differently a tiny bit. And some things in his popular letters aren't mentioned in some letters but are in others. (He spent a fortune on paper and ink for a prisoner)

And the various gospels have many copies in many different parts of the globe. We have a complete bible from 300AD
AND
so many quotes in so much correspondence, literature and songs we can actually rebuild the scriptures from those things alone. (Lee Strobel Case for Creator)



They just aren't. We have more copies of scripture than Homer's Illead...but no one seems to fuss about it.
Our salvation doesn't depend on Illead !

It's not only atheists....many biblical scholars believe we have errors in our bible...not big errors. I mean Christian scholars...some are not even Christian...

But, like I said, this doesn't bother me in the least.
 
This cannot be true.
A physical process which makes the mother unclean (giving birth) cannot be utilized to create a ceremonially cleaning activity.
All three mother, midwife, and child was ceremonially unclean until cleansing rituals were performed and a time period was finished.


Brother, I’m simply saying what happens in the natural birth process.



Jesus was born in a manger.


No midwife.

No rituals.


He came into this world by both the water He was carried in, while in His mother’s womb, as well as the blood from Mary’s hymen.



Very simple.

Very extraordinary.

Very true.



This is He who came by water and blood—Jesus Christ; not only by water, but by water and blood...




JLB
 
Brother, I’m simply saying what happens in the natural birth process.



Jesus was born in a manger.


No midwife.

No rituals.


He came into this world by both the water He was carried in as well as the blood from Mary’s hymen.



Very simple.

Very extraordinary.

Very true.



This is He who came by water and blood—Jesus Christ; not only by water, but by water and blood...




JLB
Not what I quoted and you are dodging the point.
 
Brother, I’m simply saying what happens in the natural birth process.



Jesus was born in a manger.


No midwife.

No rituals.


He came into this world by both the water He was carried in as well as the blood from Mary’s hymen.



Very simple.

Very extraordinary.

Very true.



This is He who came by water and blood—Jesus Christ; not only by water, but by water and blood...




JLB
In fact you are dodging the whole discussion...
 
Back
Top