• Love God, and love one another!

    Share your heart for Christ and others in Godly Love

    https://christianforums.net/forums/god_love/

  • Want to discuss private matters, or make a few friends?

    Ask for membership to the Men's or Lady's Locker Rooms

    For access, please contact a member of staff and they can add you in!

  • Wake up and smell the coffee!

    Join us for a little humor in Joy of the Lord

    https://christianforums.net/forums/humor_and_jokes/

  • Need prayer and encouragement?

    Come share your heart's concerns in the Prayer Forum

    https://christianforums.net/forums/prayer/

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join Hidden in Him and For His Glory for discussions on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/become-a-vessel-of-honor-part-2.112306/

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes coming in the future!

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

Is faith or works necessary for Salvation ?

danus



Really, they are very simple. You stated something about an offer of salvation here



Please explain that statement first. Maybe if we go step by step it will be easier for you understand my inquiry.



That does not matter, just be able to defend your statements with scripture. Explain this Offer of God you make mention of. Thanks..

Perhaps Danus was talking about one of these...

The one set before us to choose life.
Deuteronomy 30:19 said:
I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live:

The free gift offer of justification.
Romans 5:18 said:
Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.

And, best of all...whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

Sounds like an offer that shouldn't be refused. ;)
John 3:14-16 said:
And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up: That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
 
Perhaps Danus was talking about one of these...

The one set before us to choose life.


The free gift offer of justification.


And, best of all...whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

Sounds like an offer that shouldn't be refused. ;)

That would be clear for most...
 
glory



Who said it was ? Deal with what has been stated in the posts, do not get off the subject. I have not seen anyone mention calvin in this thread, if they have please point it out.

Your issue is that you promote a salvation by works, which is anti scriptural..

Everything you say is Calvin, there's no hiding it.

And even though you refuse to admit it, I do not promote a salvation by works.

Do you even bother to read the verses given??????????
Believing is a WORK OF GOD...NOT MAN.
 
Quite a mixed bag.




You said, "There might be issues with interpretations, but moreover it's an issue of logic."

We must allow the Holy Spirit to "reveal" the truth of the scriptures to us.

As it says in Proverbs (3:5) "Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding."

Unfortunately, we too often see "vain babblings" when discussing God's Word. Believers are not exempt from this.

Well, they are different denominations, and other than the Catholic church, there are no differences in the bibles each use. The Catholics sometimes have the apocrypha added, but the over all message at it's core is the same.
Still not everyone has, or uses the same logic in their own understanding. This is not to say one is necessarily wrong, but I've meet many a said Christian with varying definitions of things like "faith". Different understandings. It's safe to say that if someone truly has faith they understand faith, but they have to reach that point to have that understanding. Otherwise they are left with their own understanding, and that includes the idea that we have this faith before we are given this faith.
If we agree that one matures spiritually, then we also have to conclude that this maturity includes understanding, either by definitions, experiences, or some combination of both.
Anyone can pick anything apart and say it's not true. Atheist do it all the time with the very existence of God, but it does not mean they are correct. However, they are correct IN THEIR UNDERSTANDING. Is that a fair statement? You'll have to address this directly, and in it's entirety if we are going to have an exchange
 
Everything you say is Calvin, there's no hiding it.

And even though you refuse to admit it, I do not promote a salvation by works.

Do you even bother to read the verses given??????????
Believing is a WORK OF GOD...NOT MAN.

I've seen little if any Calvin in SBG post. I would not lable it Calvin. Just saying.
 
I've seen little if any Calvin in SBG post. I would not lable it Calvin. Just saying.

sbg57---Does have a "negative" view of faith in order to receive salvation. The reform folks have a "problem" with man's faith as well...So there is a "correlation."
 
sbg57---Does have a "negative" view of faith in order to receive salvation. The reform folks have a "problem" with man's faith as well...So there is a "correlation."

Address my last post if you like and we can talk about that.

However, just to clear things, reformist don't have a problem with faith, we have a variance of what faith is and where it comes from.
 
Guys, I got to get back to work, but I'll try to catch back up tonight. Have a good one :waving
 
Address my last post if you like and we can talk about that.

However, just to clear things, reformist don't have a problem with faith, we have a variance of what faith is and where it comes from.

Semantics and rationalization do not disguise the "reformists" negative response towards faith...
 
Semantics and rationalization do not disguise the "reformists" negative response towards faith...

Interesting. I can get you to the threshold, invite you in for the discussion, but you will not walk through the door.

What you say as my negativeity towards faith, is actually negetivity towards man, but you insist on saying that I'm anti-faith. You either refuse to understand or don't.
 
Interesting. I can get you to the threshold, invite you in for the discussion, but you will not walk through the door.

What you say as my negativeity towards faith, is actually negetivity towards man, but you insist on saying that I'm anti-faith. You either refuse to understand or don't.

There seems to be an "inherent" disapproval, not only with faith but, of your fellow man. (whom Christ died for because of God's LOVE for the world) That's two areas I believe are "unacceptable."
 
There seems to be an "inherent" disapproval, not only with faith but, of your fellow man. (whom Christ died for because of God's LOVE for the world) That's two areas I believe are "unacceptable."


Come on man! How much more honest, direct and exposed can I be? What riddles I'm I throwing off for you to decipher? NONE!

Do I have a problem with my "fellow man"? - yes, kind of. Like me, he is a sinner.

I have all but written in crayon what I think of faith. I said that my fellow man does not have faith he was not first given by God. You think man musters his own faith. I disagree.

I am a reformist. You are not, but nor do I think you know what you truly believe. That's OK.

I am not faulting you for that, but I am faulting you for not having the intellectual integrity to at least try to understand what you think your theological adversaries believe! In the end, your contempt is a display of your own cretinous, not mine. However, by even being involved to this level might in fact be a display of mine. :-)

I am trying to get you to see, perhaps understand the reformist view. I'm not about to ask you to agree with it. So, if you are willing, I'd like you to allow me to tell you about Martin Luther.

But first, this verse. Romans 1:16-17
New International Version (NIV)
16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God that brings salvation to everyone who believes: first to the Jew, then to the Gentile. 17 For in the gospel the righteousness of God is revealed—a righteousness that is by faith from first to last,[a] just as it is written: “The righteous will live by faith.”

First appreciate that Martin Luther grew up in the 1500. He survived the days of black plague. I can't begin to tell you here what this man went through in terms of education, his life devoted to the church, his career as a professor of bible studies in Germany, but more than that you will never know what he faced in his day and had the courage to stand up to. You'd do well to read up on him. Anyone would.

I any case, these verse changed his life. (Romans 1:16-17).

GM, you have it in your head that Man uses some sort of power within himself to come to Christ after hearing the word, and you say this is man's faith in which he actuates by his choice to do so. saying that discredits the very thing you say this man needs before hand....you are giving too much credit to man and not enough to God.

We agree on many things. Man is not saved by his works - We agree
Man is saved by faith only - We agree however, you throw something extra in by default. You will say man is saved by HIS faith - only I disagree and this is an important aspect that I want you to understand. I am begging you to at lest try to see it differently. Just this one adjustment in your thinking. Please.

The inevitable question is "Are you...You GM, Are you a sinner?" I'm not asking if you are a repentant sinner or willful sinner, but are you a sinner? Don't say yes, but I'm covered...I know that, just yes or no? Are you a sinner?

Now hold that thought....if you are then you deserve hell. If you are a sinner then you are unrighteous. If you are unrighteous then you don't measure up to God's standard, and if you do not measure up to God's standard then, you don't have what it takes to be saved, and you certainly never did before your where "saved", so how is it that you, in that condition, could possibly have anything to do with coming to God? You think "your" faith did that?

You had some super faith that perhaps made you want to hear the word, and then you r heard the word and used your faith to accept Christ?

I say you had no choice at that point if you had any faith at all, but again, you still want to believe that faith came from you. However, you've made other statements before that indicate you agree that faith comes from God.

So, then what do we do with Ephesians 2:8–9? 8 For by grace you have been saved bthrough faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God 9 not as a result of works, so that no one may boast.

Calvin put it this way. "“[Paul] exhorts the Ephesians to remember (Ephesians 2) that they were saved by grace, not by themselves nor by their own works.... Faith, moreover, precedes justification, but in such a sense, that in respect of God, it follows. What they [Roman Catholics] say of faith might perhaps hold true, were faith itself, which puts us in possession of righteousness, our own. But seeing that it too is the free gift of God, the exception which they introduce is superfluous. Scripture, indeed, removes all doubt on another ground, when it opposes faith to works, to prevent its being classed among merits. Faith brings nothing of our own to God, but receives what God spontaneously offers us. Hence it is that faith, however imperfect, nevertheless possesses a perfect righteousness, because it has respect to nothing but the gratuitous goodness of God.” (John Calvin Acts of the Council of Trent With its Antidote, in The Comprehensive John Calvin Collection (Ages Digital Library, 1998), 110) .

So what about those verse and Martin Luther? Well, It is in verse 17 that we come to the real heart of our obtaining the gospel. This is the verse that plagued Martin Luther until he finally understood it.

Particularly, it is this phrase “the righteousness of God” that was crucial to Luther. Luther was a monk. He desired to obtain salvation by what he did. Luther not only held to the rules rigidly, but he confessed all his sins. In fact, he confessed so much and for so long every day that his confessor told him to stop confessing until he had done enough sin to confess! It wasn’t enough for Luther. He asked this question, “how can I stand before the holiness of my Judge with works polluted in their very source?”

When he looked at this phrase “the righteousness of God,” he understood it to mean the righteousness of God as judge, by which He condemns all sinners to everlasting torment. Now, the righteousness of God does do that to all who will not believe, but that is not what this verse is talking about. It was when Luther finally realized what this phrase meant that he was born again. Luther finally came to realize that here in Romans 1:17, the righteousness of God does not mean God’s condemning righteousness, but rather the righteousness of Christ that is given to us as a free gift when we exercise faith in Jesus Christ. What faith? the faith we get from God,...and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God 9 not as a result of works, so that no one may boast.

You should thank God for your faith to begin with, otherwise for whom should you thank? Yourself? If we are not saved by our works, then we are not saved by any of our own effort. You can not have it both ways. Accepting Christ, is accepting salvation. Choice or condition? Because once one is in such a condition, there is NO choice but to accept what's obvious.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
glory

The free gift offer of justification.

Were do you see the word offer in Rom 5:18 ?

18Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.
 
Well, they are different denominations, and other than the Catholic church, there are no differences in the bibles each use. The Catholics sometimes have the apocrypha added, but the over all message at it's core is the same.
Still not everyone has, or uses the same logic in their own understanding. This is not to say one is necessarily wrong, but I've meet many a said Christian with varying definitions of things like "faith". Different understandings. It's safe to say that if someone truly has faith they understand faith, but they have to reach that point to have that understanding. Otherwise they are left with their own understanding, and that includes the idea that we have this faith before we are given this faith.
If we agree that one matures spiritually, then we also have to conclude that this maturity includes understanding, either by definitions, experiences, or some combination of both.
Anyone can pick anything apart and say it's not true. Atheist do it all the time with the very existence of God, but it does not mean they are correct. However, they are correct IN THEIR UNDERSTANDING. Is that a fair statement? You'll have to address this directly, and in it's entirety if we are going to have an exchange

I wholeheartedly agree with what you've stated here. I know, from personal experience, that I'll have a particular understanding that I've picked up somewhere along the way. Then one day, I'll be reading a passage I've read a hundred times, and see a truth I hadn't seen before. It's not always easy to sort out what is our human thinking and what is given to us by the Holy Spirit. He is always leading us into a deeper understanding of the Word. My test is always to compare scripture with scripture and try to throw out anything that doesn't meet that test.

I'll pray for you if you pray for me, and maybe we'll draw closer to Him along the way. :)
 
I've seen little if any Calvin in SBG post. I would not lable it Calvin. Just saying.

Ah, well that just shows you how little I know about the different .....whatever I should call them. Doctrines? I don't know. Thanks for the heads up.
 
Come on man! How much more honest, direct and exposed can I be? What riddles I'm I throwing off for you to decipher? NONE!

Do I have a problem with my "fellow man"? - yes, kind of. Like me, he is a sinner.

I have all but written in crayon what I think of faith. I said that my fellow man does not have faith he was not first given by God. You think man musters his own faith. I disagree.

I am a reformist. You are not, but nor do I think you know what you truly believe. That's OK.

Oops, I'm not going to read any further than this.

Please don't be saying you don't think we know what we truly believe. That's not okay.

Of course we know what we believe and we are confident in our belief. So, to even make that statement, is counter productive to any discussion. I would never say you don't know what you believe. That's just not right. Each of us believes what we believe...we've been persuaded. Belief is "being persuaded" so it is not something we're not sure about. I hope you hear where I'm coming from.
 
glory



Were do you see the word offer in Rom 5:18 ?

18Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.

LOL You don't see the word 'work" coupled with believe, either, but you keep harping on it. ;)



This one just takes a little common sense. I have a present for you, SbyG. Here it is if you want it.

Sure sounds like an offer to me.
I'm holding it out....I'm offering you this really pretty package, hoping you'll accept it.
 
Oops, I'm not going to read any further than this.

Please don't be saying you don't think we know what we truly believe. That's not okay.

Of course we know what we believe and we are confident in our belief. So, to even make that statement, is counter productive to any discussion. I would never say you don't know what you believe. That's just not right. Each of us believes what we believe...we've been persuaded. Belief is "being persuaded" so it is not something we're not sure about. I hope you hear where I'm coming from.

Danus, "I am a reformist. You are not, but nor do I think you know what you truly believe. That's OK."

Grubal---"The ability to make such a statement is acquired through the presence of a "higher IQ" none the less..."
 
Back
Top