Hi
jeremiah1five
Well, the argument seems to be that Mary must have had some genetic influence in the birth of Jesus because, otherwise, he wouldn't have been human.
Hello miamited.
I agree. Mary passed on her genetics to her human Son, Jesus (remember, the Divine comes from the Holy Spirit.)
So I ask, how were Adam and Eve then humans if they weren't created from some previously existing human's DNA? If Adam and Ever were human, though obviously not formed from any previous DNA, although Eve did have a part of Adam's rib cage, then wouldn't it stand that Jesus could also be human while not having been created from some previous human DNA?
Adam was created from the dust of the ground. In Genesis there are two Hebrew words translated in the English "created." The first word is "bara" which is used of God creating something out of nothing (heaven and earth.)\The other word is "tohu" which means to create something out of something (else) such as Adam from the dust and the woman from his rib, etc.
8 And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had
formed. Gen. 2:8.
Let's look at the word "formed." I use James Strong's Hebrew and Greek. Always have. I like that he just gives the definition without adding what
he thinks it means and how you should apply it without the commentary.
Strong's #3334 -
yâtsar. pronounced
yaw-tsar. meaning "
squeezing" or "
pressing" into shape; to
mould into a form; espec. as a potter.
I like the way you think. That is, I like that you THINK period. I never looked that 'deep' into the question, I just accepted that God created the man and woman with everything necessary to produce offspring and pass on their genes on down the line all the way to Jesus and Jesus' half-brothers and half-sisters, and to their kids as well.
So, Jesus was born with Mary's DNA and all the cellular structures and genes necessary for birth. That is the miracle first of Jesus birth and second that He was born a man also with DNA and all the cellular stuff babies are born with.
Biblical doctrine states that Jesus is fully man (human.) He is not half human because He only had the woman's DNA but that provoked an interesting thought. Without a man's DNA and cellular stuff, I still believe that Jesus being fully man would also be able to have children with a woman even without a man's DNA (Joseph) because that is the miracle of His birth. Being fully man to me means He is human in every way that defines human.
As I say, we don't any of us know the actual 'how' Jesus came to be implanted in Mary's womb, but I'm going to give credit that if God can make humans without using some previous human's DNA, then He 'could' have done that with Jesus. The 'coming over' of the Holy Spirit with Mary could just as well have been to implant an already fully formed zygote. Otherwise, it just gets kind of messy to me that the Holy Spirit only brought the male part of the equation, but apparently could not have provided the female part of the equation. How then was Jesus born a male, if there were no male chromosomes in his genetic makeup...only female?
Ah, I was thinking that above, so we are on the same page. Let me share something with you that I like to share with others to test their knowledge and have fun with the question. But I'll share it as a statement.
God creates a human four ways.
1. From the dust of the ground (Adam)
2. From the man without the woman (Eve)
3. From the woman without the man (Christ)
4. From the man and woman together (children)
As I said above that is the miracle of Jesus' birth. God conceived Him with every
thing necessary to birth Him fully human. God did it and it is marvelous in our sight.
But I fully admit that it's not something that God has made clear to us through the Scriptures, the 'how' Jesus came to be in Mary's womb other than to say that the Holy Spirit came over her. What did he actually do to affect the zygote of Jesus attached to her uterine wall, to then be born as any other human child is born. Which was necessary for the prophecy of the Scriptures to be true. The virgin will be with child! And it is merely an esoteric discussion of the possibilities of 'how' Jesus came to be implanted in Mary's womb and born unto us.
That's all. God bless, Ted.
We can only look at the result of His birth and not the inner workings of things like those things you think of above. Intriguing to say the least. But all we can come to is reasonable speculation about those microscopic things like DNA and cells and genes.
But I do know one thing...He looks just like His Father.
And if we accept He's fully human, then He also looks like His mother.
But one more thing I believe is that when God said, "Let us make man in our own image" I believe that the image of God is Christ and that God looked forward (even prophesied) to the day His Son would be born. And Scripture says we are being conformed into the image of Christ (not Adam.)
I hold the image of God is Christ and that there is no better image of a Father than a Son.
How did I do?