Ernest T. Bass
Member
Again, Heb 9:16-17 it would be impossible for the thief to be an example of NT gospel salvation.Good point, but I doubt if the Saved Thief haggled too much about which Covenant he was Saved under......lol
There could be more NT Gospel in this story than meets the eye...... The New Covenant is based on the Death, Burial and Resurrection Of Jesus and our Faith in those Facts.The Thief knew that Jesus was going to die on that Cross , Yet he said to Jesus, “ Remember me when you come into Your Kingdom”......This was proof that the thief believed Jesus would be brought back from the Dead......He had Faith in the Resurrection Of Jesus Christ— that is a NT Faith That will go a long way in getting you Saved......Combine That Belief with the Belief that “ Jesus was Lord” and one has fulfilled Romans 10:9—-New Testament, for sure...Technically, before the death of the Testator, But Jesus seemed to let it slide....if it worked for Jesus, who cares about technicalities ? The Faith Of The Thief was immense— everybody that was ever saved , no matter what the Spiritual Economy was, no matter what Age it was, Be it the Age Of Law or the Age of Grace was Saved by that Grace, working through Faith......
NT salvation requires one to believe God "hath raised" (past tense) Christ from the dead (Rom 10:9) something the thief could not do since Christ had not yet died much less been resurrected. The NT also requires a baptism into the death of Christ (Rom 6:2-7) before one can be freed from sin and walk in newness of life. Again, not something the thief could do for Christ had not died and the NT gospel was not therefore yet in effect.
The thief's knowledge of God/Christ was probably better than some of Christ's own disciples. He knew God existed, God was to be feared, the Christ was an innocent man, that the cross would not be the end of Christ, that Christ would have a kingdom and saw a need to be in that kingdom. The thief's knowledge of this could be because he had been water baptized (Mk 1:4-5; Lk 3:21) with John's baptism but later fell into a life of crime and was now repentant of his sins to Christ.
Usually the thief is used as 'proof text' water baptism is not essential to being saved for, as the argument goes, the thief was saved without being water baptized. That is an unprovable assumption for he may very well have been of those of Mark 1:4 that was water baptized hence the knowledge he had of Christ. And having already been water baptized would not need to be re-baptized but simply repent of his sins.
Since the thief lived under the OT law he would not be accountable to Christ's NT great commission therefore not accountable to being obedient to Acts 2:38 as we today who live after it are accountable to it.
When Jesus was "on earth" He had the power/authority to forgive the sins of those whom He thought was deserving (Matt 9:6) as this thief. When Christ left earth some 2000 years ago, He left behind His NT as His authority on earth and that NT requires belief, repentance, confession and baptism. If any today desire to be saved as the thief, then they need a time machine to go back some 2000 years to when Christ was on earth and the OT still in effect, commit a crime and find themselves hanging next to Christ on a cross and repent asking for forgiveness.