Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
The difference is Jesus isn't the "One whoThe parable of the sower is without all you posted.
If I do not have it wrong, your John 12 quote is not part of the parable of the sower.
The parable of the sower is just about physical seeds, grout condition, crop yield.
The John 12 passage is about his death and resurrection. Verse 23 turns the conversation to himself.
Yes we must die similar to Jesu, but IMHO there are some differences.
It certainly is. Our Lord putting to death the desires of mans' flesh through which Satan temps doesn't mean God condoned murder.The dance through all this is tedious.
What do you think he died to? His death was by not enforcing the law against sinners. On earth, he could have accused, convicted and sentenced any sinner to death without condemning Himself. We on the other handWe are talking about the Law and not the death of Jesus.
eddif
The difference is Jesus isn't the "One who
needed" to die, die to self. We are.
Without the law there is no knowledge of sin. That is a statement of scripture. What I might think contrary to that would be wrong.The difference is Jesus isn't the "One who
needed" to die, die to self. We are.
It certainly is. Our Lord putting to death the desires of mans' flesh through which Satan temps doesn't mean God condoned murder.
What do you think he died to? His death was by not enforcing the law against sinners. On earth, he could have accused, convicted and sentenced any sinner to death without condemning Himself. We on the other hand
are become dead to the law...by the body of Christ.....Rom.7:4
We've repented (which God also doesn't need to do) and condemn no one because of his teaching and example.
For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God. Gal.2:19
If people aren't repentant, or look down their noses on others, they are still alive to the law.
Knowing good from evil is natural Godly nature and even before that, Adam could think and reason which are Godly characteristics bestowed by God on all mankind.Without the law there is no knowledge of sin. That is a statement of scripture. What I might think contrary to that would be wrong.
Well again. Elihu thought that man had knowledge. God inferred Elihu had no knowledge and brushed aside his chapters long speech and talked to Job instead. There is no natural Godly nature normall in man. That is an eastern mysticism belief.
Thank you eddif, but the Book of Job isn't a mystery to me. It's only confusing if the gospel the Messiah taught is misunderstood.Do you want me to try and take you through the Elihu information. I learned the hard way that took 15? Years. Would be my joy to try and help.
eddif
Its funny how Ed and others show they do not like such a long post that I gave, and what is brought up from that long long post is part of a sentence from it.Paul is showing how Jesus could have used the law to condemn those who sinned against him, but chose not to.
It is not God that has changed, from when God told the people of Israel to choose life, if you remember about John 1, and the power to be born not of the will of man, but of God is given, EVEN TO THEM THAT BELIEVE ON HIS NAME.God in the old Testament said " This day I set before you life or death, choose life". After reading the Bible I seem to think he has not changed. It seems to me God keeps trying to make it easier to get into heaven and mankind keeps trying to make it harder. Today I see the same choice God stated in the old testament. Choose the New Covenant or the Old covenant for life or choose neither for death. There is no choice for mixing the two covenants one must choose.
the only thing I know to try is this:Its funny how Ed and others show they do not like such a long post that I gave, and what is brought up from that long long post is part of a sentence from it.
I know it was a very long sentence, but as shown again in that sentence below, Jesus Christ declares Himself to be the fulfilment of the promise made before the law, which shows the law is irrelevant to all things, but what drew us near to God, which is only the Messiah.
All of these debates, disputes, are perverse, just see those testimonies below again also.
"But now the righteousness of God is manifested to be without that same law, ( of sin and death by the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus. Romans 8:2.) which is what was WITNESSED BY THE LAW AND THE PROPHETS, which is even the RIGHTEOUSNESS OF GOD WITHOUT THE LAW, ( because the Son of God came declaring the righteousness of the Father. Psalm 40:10.) which is by faith of Jesus Christ, ( Christ declared the faithfulness of the Father. Psalm 40:10.) unto and upon all them that believe, ( in the name declared. John 17:26.) because all had sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. ( who were in the law of sin and death) to be justified freely by HIs grace and redemption in Christ Jesus, as God had prophesied of giving HIs Son as propitiation for faith in HIs blood, ( Isaiah 53:10. Zechariah 9:11) to declare HIs righteousness for the remission of past sins because of Gods forbearance. ( faithfulness)"
Acts 20:30 Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them.
1 Timothy 6:3 If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness;
4 He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings,
5 Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself.
"Righteous without the law" is to showthe RIGHTEOUSNESS OF GOD WITHOUT THE LAW,
If you guys, or some of you want to turn away from this point for you, that Jesus Christ being crucified ( HAVINVG ABOLISHED IN HIS FLESH) is the end of the law contained in ordinances, and how God made peace in Himself, to make ONE NEW MAN, it sounds like the old man talking in his discussions here.
What do you think ten, fifteen, twenty years of discussion on forums can avail and reveal ?
For one time at least seem to notice the interesting testimony below in the verses how they join together, to testify about us, how we were children in BONDAGE, ( in understanding before Christ) under those elements of the world, ( the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances.) but when the FULNESS OF THE TIME WAS COME, God sent forth His Son made under the law, to redeem us to receive Him to receive the adoption of sons.
Read and see what is told, why discuss instead of hear the testimony that gives us life if we believe in it , the law made nothing perfect ( the Son of God was therefore MADE UNDFER THE LAW, AS THE LAW MADE NOTHING PERFECT) and THAT bringing in of a BETTER HOPE, draws us near to God.
Now the faith of God's elect, and the acknowledging of the truth which is after godliness has hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot lie, promised before the world began.
BUT God has in DUE TIMES ( BUT when the FULNESS OF THE TIME WAS COME, God sent forth His Son made under the law, to redeem us to receive Him to receive the adoption of sons.) manifested his word through preaching, committed unto apostle Paul according to the commandment of God our Saviour.
Ephesians 2:15 Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace;
Galatians 4:3 Even so we, when we were children, were in bondage under the elements of the world:
4 But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law,
5 To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons.
Hebrews 7:19 For the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did; by the which we draw nigh unto God.
Titus 1:1 Paul, a servant of God, and an apostle of Jesus Christ, according to the faith of God's elect, and the acknowledging of the truth which is after godliness;
2 In hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot lie, promised before the world began;
3 But hath in due times manifested his word through preaching, which is committed unto me according to the commandment of God our Saviour;
That is what I said. and I agree that old covenant will not save a person.t is not God that has changed
I’m okBut.That is what I said. and I agree that old covenant will not save a person.
So Isaiah wrote of Jesus.I’m okBut.
But What?
But What About This? Because Of someone reading A Prophet that write During The Time Of The Law ?
Acts 8:26-39 kjv
This is about a person reading an Old Testament prophet, and having a Question.
And God sending someone With the Gospel answer. , that led toward salvation.
Mississippi Redneck
eddif
You can say it about your way.So Isaiah wrote of Jesus.
And the one sent was a disciple of Christ not a Jew under the Law. Jesus was spoke of in Deu. The new covenant is what God provided to us and it replaced all of the old covenant not in part.
Absolutely Isaiah wrote of Jesus.So Isaiah wrote of Jesus.
And the one sent was a disciple of Christ not a Jew under the Law. Jesus was spoke of in Deu. The new covenant is what God provided to us and it replaced all of the old covenant not in part.
You want to say that Matthew 5:17 contradicts Romans 4:5 ?That said. This thread is not trying to get anyone circumcised or follow the law of Moses. But. We may discuss all aspects and why for a time it was done. The reasons why will be discussed.
Matthew 5:17 kjv
17. Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:17 kjvYou want to say that Matthew 5:17 contradicts Romans 4:5 ?
I missed you were a new member.You want to say that Matthew 5:17 contradicts Romans 4:5 ?