Scotth1960
Member
AMEN.All good things proceed from the Father.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
AMEN.All good things proceed from the Father.
Dear francisdesales, While you attempt to throw some stones at Photios of Constantinople, and question whether or not he was a saint, you sidestep the issue of John 15:26 every time it is brought up.
You refer constantly to papal tradition and papal authority/infallibility and "supremacy". What is supreme and saintly about Pope Sergius III of Rome. Where is it infallible and in keeping with the sanctity of St. Peter,
All good things proceed from the Father.
Dear Francisdesales, Saint Leo III forbad the Filioque. Was he wrong to do that? That contradicts later popes who insist on it? Centering everything on what the Pope of Rome says does not solve the problem of which popes of Rome we will believe, because they teach contradictory doctrines. In Erie PA Scott R. Harrington
Dear francisdesales, I comdemn no one. You just seem to misrepresent what I am doing. What is not required of us, submission to Rome, will not condemn anyone, nor do I comdemn you since you say things I disagree with. We just have a difference of opinion. I just think you are making too much of one bishop. Rome has apostolic succession, but they stepped away from unity in 1054 AD. Until then they were doing fine. I was doing fine until I sinned. So I don't condemn anyone. I need forgiveness myself. I just don't agree with papism. Take care. God bless you. (I do not harass you, disagreeing is not harassing, you should be fair. I have no personal animosity against you. It is okay to disagree and still be friends.) In Erie PA Scott HarringtonWhy did Leo III forbid the Filioque, Scott? For the sake of peace, or the sake that it was an heretical teaching? Naturally, the former. We STILL omit the Filioque when speaking the Creed in Greek in the presence of Greeks, Scott. Out of deference to our brothers (who fortunately, are not as rabid to condemn everyone not of Orthodoxy as you are), we drop the Filoque so as not to offend. Is there a possibility that Orthodox apologists can do anything other than offend? Must they feel the need to constantly harass and heckle a brother of an apostolic Church?
Regards
Yes there was indwelling of the Holy Spirit in the OT but not en masse, not for all those who followed God, it was a very selective process and by no means permanant. The great prophetic hope of the nation was that God would pour his Spirit out on all flesh, while it is ture that God had poured his Spirit out only on some flesh, including one's such as prophets, Kings, priests, and even judges like samson did experience the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit. But even in the NT the indwelling of the Holy Spirit must be consistant with the OT, including the "seal" that we have (which I detailed in another thread).
~Josh
The apostles did indeed lay hands on some to receive a certain measure of the Spirit but I know of no scripture evidence that those who received the Spirit thuswise could in turn lay hands on others for the same purpose. If so, WHERE is the scripture?
Acts 2:38 describes the exact moment when I received the Holy Spirit,
And just how many total instances do we have in Scripture compared to the thousands of believers? Just because Acts shows what happened or how it was done among the initial instances with difference groups of people, does not in any way mean that that is how it is always supposed to happen.Again, what we see in scripture is that the Spirit was given by observable miraculous means (Acts 10:44) or via the laying on of the apostle's hands (Acts 19:6).
And just how many total instances do we have in Scripture compared to the thousands of believers? Just because Acts shows what happened or how it was done among the initial instances with difference groups of people, does not in any way mean that that is how it is always supposed to happen.
If you can't argue with that line of reasoning, then why are you arguing with it? :D The line of reasoning that our experiences much match exactly with what happened in Scripture or it isn't of God, is quite weak, fallacious, and can even be dangerous.Can't argue with that line of reasoning at all. We are in fact dealing with a God who spoke the world into being so for Him, we don't exactly have boundaries. But for the person claiming to have received God's Holy Breath, their claim lacks credibility when their experience does match was the scriptures reveal and those claims because extremely subjective.
If you can't argue with that line of reasoning, then why are you arguing with it? :D The line of reasoning that our experiences much match exactly with what happened in Scripture or it isn't of God, is quite weak, fallacious, and can even be dangerous.
The Bible is a guide and a measuring stick. It is not at all a completely detailed manual on how our experiences must be.