Runmyramble
Member
IdkDo you think the majority of baptized received one as well ?
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
IdkDo you think the majority of baptized received one as well ?
My comment was to jaybo. I don't know why you answered.Did the 3000 on the day of Pentecost get any "paper work"?
How about the Thyatiran jailor?
Lydia?
No, there was only one true baptism. That was with water.Correct, showing that there is more than just one baptism in each instance.
In the Catholic Church baptism certificates serve a practical purpose.So why then this present day incessant need to issue baptismal certificates to everyone as though they they were vaccinated ?
And even accepting the baptismal certificate as part and parcel of the performance why the need to prominently display the name and holy status of the baptizer when it has been established that they are an immaterial , non-factor in the process?
My opinion is that the majority of people today being baptized are wasting their time. Why? Because they are being baptized for some reason other reason then the one God commanded. They are sprinkled, poured on, baptized as a small child, baptized “because they are saved”, baptized into some strange church or denomination. It’s harder to get into the Baptist church then into heaven. So, my opinion is that these people can hand out whatever certificates they want because it’s all just made up anyway. But no, those that have heard the gospel, believed it, repented and been baptized in water in order to put on Christ and have their sins removed will not receive a “certificate”. I didn’t. Nobody I know within the lords church has. The only certificate we receive that matters is the recording of our name in the lambs book of life. And you won’t see that certificate until judgment day.Really ?
So is it your opinion that the majority of baptized people today did not receive any document in connection ?
Here’s why...Why do you think the Holy Spirit baptism is no longer in effect?
No. Nowhere did Peter EVER promise the “baptism of the HS”. Peter said...after a person was baptized, they would “receive the gift of the HS”. He DID NOT use the phrase....”baptism with the HS”. Jesus in acts 1 specifically used that baptism phrase when he made the promise to the apostles. You are adding words to the text that aren’t there. Don’t get caught into that trap.Isn't it promised my Peter at the same time he commanded water baptism in Acts 2:38?
I know Peter mentions that phrase in acts 10 but does that mean that the “gift of the HS” was the direct baptism of the HS or was he just referring to the miraculous ability Cornelius was now displaying?Holy Spirit baptism is the same as the gift of the Holy Ghost.
was what happened to Cornelius the same as what happened to those in Ephesus? Yes or no? If yes then explain how.Cornelius and the twelve at Ephesus are the best examples of both these baptisms.
show me one person in the NT that received “HS baptism” and wasn’t aware of it?Of course the Holy Spirit baptism is in effect, and has been since the day of Pentecost. Anyone who denies this (or even doubts it) hasn't received it (or has and isn't aware of it, which is tragic.)
Lamasibmysamalalabymeabut I did receive the gift of speaking in tongues prior to my baptism.
I think there is some confusion here.Here’s why...
In acts 1 Jesus, speaking directly to the apostles made this promise....
Acts 1:4,5 And, being assembled together with them, commanded them that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, saith he, ye have heard of me. For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence.
This promise, right here, at this time, was ONLY GIVEN to the apostles. They waited 10 days and then this happened to ONLY the apostles.
Acts 2:2-4 And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting. And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance. And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them.
This describes what a “baptism of the HS” looks like. It is a miraculous event for effect. This was not for their salvation.
There is only one other example of HS baptism in all the NT and guess what? It follows this same pattern. (Acts 10) It was a miraculous event other people could witness. Everyone knew something amazing had just taken place. NOWHERE do we ever see a non miraculous “HS baptism” (If so, show me) and all these people today want to claim they were “baptized with HS” even though there was no miraculous event and they can’t prove any of it. It goes like this.....yeaaa, I was baptized with HS! Someone then says...oh yea? What happened?
Oh..nothing, I just know I was baptized with Spirit.
Those in acts 8, after they were baptized in water, DID NOT receive the Spirit. The HS, through Luke, made it a point to tell us this fact. The Bible will define what it means if you just read, study and let it do the work. Dont add to or take away from the text. There is much more I could say as to why I dont believe this is for us today but I don’t see how people get past these above facts.
From heaven.Is John‘s baptism from heaven or from men?
Johns baptism is not the only one that is with water. Jesus, in the great commission, commanded water baptism under the new covenant.If John’s baptism, the baptism in water is no longer in effect, then please provide the scripture that says baptism in water is no longer in effect.
Let’s stop right here for a moment.I think there is some confusion here.
According to Zeb Bradford Long and Douglas McMurray, two Presbyterian Charismatics, in their book Receiving The Power, there are two distinctive ways in which the Holy Spirit acts and these are often confused, not the least because the same phrases are used in scripture regarding them. These two ways are referred to by Long & McMurray as ‘the Spirit upon’ and ‘the Spirit within’. I quote:
"There are two major motifs in scripture…that reflect two different operations of the Holy Spirit. One motif has the Spirit coming “upon” people for power in ministry. A second has the Spirit coming “within” people for salvation and to develop in them skill, wisdom, godly character and maturity in faith and love. Both motifs are equally important and equally biblical." (from Receiving The Power)
Thus there is an internal and external work of the Spirit.
I do not believe that Christians “today” have any miraculous (which is what you mean by “charismatic”) gifts of the HS today. If they did I would have seen it by now. I travel for a living and I’m around many different people and NEVER have I ever seen a demonstration of ANYTHING. The only thing people can say to me is....your just not in the right places. Really? Is that it? I thought Peter promised “the gift of the HS” to everybody? Why am I the one who never gets to witness it? Pope Frank don’t do nothing.The internal work corresponds to the sanctifying gifts of the Spirit, as well as practical gifts.
The external work corresponds to the charismatic gifts of the Spirit which are given for work of ministry
Maybe. If it happens it’s without my knowledge. I know Paul said...that those in Ephesus were “sealed with the Spirit” but it won’t come as a surprise that I take a different view on that statement. But, if a person wants to believe that the Spirit is doing what you say above I’m not going to argue against them. It’s only when they take it to the next step and say they are miraculously indwelled is when I’m going to have a problem.In baptism (with water) we receive the Holy Spirit for the internal work of renewing and sanctifying us.
The apostles laid hands on people in the first century to impart spiritual gifts for exactly this reason. They didn’t have the fully recorded record of the church. We do now so there is no need for these gifts. Lk 16:31 is still a true statement and is still valid today.In the "Baptism with the Holy Spirit" we receive the Holy Spirit for the external gifts for ministry and the upbuilding of the Church
From heaven.
Will you answer my question?
Was Johns baptism for gentiles as well as Jews?
Why did this happen? Did it have anything to do with their salvation? No. It was for effect to get people’s attention and to to be amazed so they would listen to the message being spoken miraculously.When scripture uses the phrase “receive the Holy Spirit” (or similar) it may be using it to refer to either “the Spirit upon” or the “Spirit within”. Some discernment is needed and sometimes the text is not clear. One test is whether there is some manifestation of “the Spirit upon”.
The Spirit Upon
In Acts, Luke seems to use the term exclusively for “the Spirit upon”. At Pentecost the Holy Spirit, in the form of tongues of fire, comes to rest on those in the Upper Room and they all begin to speak in tongues (manifestation) (Acts 2:1-4)
Why did this Happen? Did it have anything to do with their salvation? No. They were still in their sins. It was just like Pentecost. For effect! For the benefit of the audience and not the person who the Spirit was “upon”. The Jews did not want to have anything to do with the gentiles. Have you read Jonah lately? Did he want that gentile nation to receive mercy from God? That’s why we see the comment.....In Acts 10 the Holy Spirit falls on Cornelius and his household and they began to speak in tongues (manifestation). Peter says "Can any one forbid water for baptizing these people who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?" (vs 47) – referring to Pentecost. This is “the Spirit upon”.
Yes and the HS did not fall on them or they did not “receive the Spirit” until they came in contact with an apostle. The point here is....It didn’t just happen. So why would anybody think that, today, it just happens?In Acts 8 Phillip has been baptizing in Samaria. Peter and John are sent to lay hands on those baptized and prayed for them “that they might receive the Holy Spirit; for it had not yet fallen on any of them, but they had only been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. Then they laid their hands on them and they received the Holy Spirit.” (Acts 8:15-17). Though no particular manifestation is reported there clearly was one because Simon the magician wanted to have the same power saying "Give me also this power, that any one on whom I lay my hands may receive the Holy Spirit." (Vs 19)
Again. It didn’t “just happen”. They did not receive the Spirit until coming in contact with an apostle.In Acts 19 Paul is in Ephesus and meets 12 men who claim to be disciples but they seem to be lacking something. Paul asks:
"Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?"
They replied
"No, we have never even heard that there is a Holy Spirit."
They had only been baptized in John’s baptism. Paul has them baptized in the name of Jesus “And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Spirit came on them; and they spoke with tongues and prophesied.” (vs 6)
It seems they had not received the Holy Spirit in the sense of “the Spirit upon” because Paul could see no manifestations, which then happened when Paul laid hands on them. If they had not been baptized in the name of Jesus then they had not received “the Spirit within” either, but I will come to that later.
Yes. But how does he do this? How does one know they are a “child of God through the Spirit”?The Spirit Within
Paul himself, in his writings, seems to use receiving the Holy Spirit in the sense of “the Spirit within” (for character and salvation)
“For you did not receive the spirit of slavery to fall back into fear, but you have received the spirit of sonship. When we cry, "Abba! Father!" it is the Spirit himself bearing witness with our spirit that we are children of God” (Rom 8:15-16)
“Now we have received not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit which is from God, that we might understand the gifts bestowed on us by God.” (1Cor 2:12)
I will end just like I began. I NEVER said that the Spirt does not dwell within the Christian. I believe he does. Where I differ with most is on the “how”.“Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, which you have from God?” (1Cor 6:19)
There are also two ways of being filled with the Holy Spirit which correspond to that internal and external work.
But I'll leave that for now.
It's already been explained....Non-sequitur. (No relevant content.)
For if there were such a thing as a salvific dry baptism (into reality or whatever else you are now claiming you are baptized into), you would be able to easily answer my questions, which you and others have all dodged.
In Christianity, matter...matters.
I am sure it is written in the bible, in the section titled Old Testament.
The new temple is of the New Testament.
The resurrection will unveil my new, eternal, vessel.
I didn't suggest thatLet’s stop right here for a moment.
I never said....the Spirt DOES NOT DWELL WITHIN the Christian.
At baptism (with water)I believe he does. Now the question is......How does he do it?
I do believe the charismatic gifts of the Spirit are for today as much as at the beginning. They were not just for the apostles. Read 1Cor 12:4-11I do not believe that Christians “today” have any miraculous (which is what you mean by “charismatic”) gifts of the HS today. If they did I would have seen it by now. I travel for a living and I’m around many different people and NEVER have I ever seen a demonstration of ANYTHING. The only thing people can say to me is....your just not in the right places. Really? Is that it? I thought Peter promised “the gift of the HS” to everybody? Why am I the one who never gets to witness it? Pope Frank don’t do nothing.
Maybe. If it happens it’s without my knowledge. I know Paul said...that those in Ephesus were “sealed with the Spirit” but it won’t come as a surprise that I take a different view on that statement. But, if a person wants to believe that the Spirit is doing what you say above I’m not going to argue against them. It’s only when they take it to the next step and say they are miraculously indwelled is when I’m going to have a problem.
The apostles laid hands on people in the first century to impart spiritual gifts for exactly this reason. They didn’t have the fully recorded record of the church. We do now so there is no need for these gifts. Lk 16:31 is still a true statement and is still valid today.
Hi, aren't you both Catholic?I didn't suggest that
At baptism (with water)
I do believe the charismatic gifts of the Spirit are for today as much as at the beginning. They were not just for the apostles. Read 1Cor 12:4-11
Don't you believe the Spirit indwells in people?
Yes, the apostles laid hands on people to impart gifts.
I think you have a misunderstanding of the purpose of the charismatic gifts. They were/are not just to impress people. They are for for ministry, for edifying the Church (1Cor 14:1-19). They are given by the Spirit "who apportions to each one individually as he wills" (1Cor 12:11). But we can ask for them and pray fpor them..