Not_Now.Soon
Member
How about by saying God is the source of all creation.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
What would be wrong with the answer "No one made God: God is self-existant." ?If you were talking to a secular person in your country, how would you answer the question: Who made God?
see we do need to answer atheistsTo my brothers and sisters in Christ,
I live in a secular, godless society where people deny the existence of God.
Too often they can't get to the basics and ask: You talk so much about God and his evidence in creation, but who made God?
If you were talking to a secular person in your country, how would you answer the question: Who made God?
Blessings,
Oz
My answer to this question, 'Who made God?' proposes 2 approaches:
1. It commits a category mistake. Listen to Sean McDowell's explanation at:
Examples include:
Here are a couple more examples of a category mistake by Matt Slick:
- How much does a musical note weigh? Musical notes make a sound while weights measure mass. They are 2 different categories and we must not confuse them. If I said a musical note weighs 10 grams, you’d have every reason to consult a psychiatrist. Musical notes and weights are 2 different categories of things and we must not confuse the two.
- McDowell gave another example of a category fallacy: What does the colour pink taste like? Again it’s a category mistake. Colours don’t have taste.
- Similarly, to ask, ‘Who made God?’ is a category mistake. It only makes sense to ask who made something of things that can be made such as a chair or a pair of shoes.
- ‘To say that "the rock is alive" assigns the category of life to that which is not alive’.
- Another example would be to say that an idea is the color blue. It mistakenly applies the category of color to a concept in the mind.
Or, where is the bachelor’s wife? That’s a category mistake because by definition, a bachelor is a bachelor because he doesn’t have a wife.
2. That leads to a second way to answer this question of who made God:
- God, by definition, cannot be made. If he were created he wouldn’t be God. It’s like asking, ‘Who made the uncreatable, eternal maker of the universe?'
Oz
- Only things that have a beginning, whether that be the manufacture of a motor vehicle, the conception of a baby, the making of a Laptop computer or the start of the universe, need a designer. Only these kinds of items and people need a creator.
What would be wrong with the answer "No one made God: God is self-existant." ?
How about by saying God is the source of all creation.
see we do need to answer atheists
Have u used this explanation on any atheists or your students?
If so did any of them accept it or understand it?
Im fairly certain that the hardened atheist will never budge
I can hear the hardened atheist rejecting those analogies
I can hear him saying "just cos the question is fallacious it doesn't dismiss it"
Or "where then did God come from?"
What is fallacious (erroneous) about the question: Who made God?
You and I are made from the Earth. We are the dirt in a way, made from the elements from the earth.
No it is not an explanation, but if one has someone who reluctantly has admitted to there being immaterial things the kalam challenges them as to how the universe began and by implication hat God is pre-existing. That prepares them for the biblical claim that God has always existed.A student in grade 6 (age 11.5 years) asked me this question when I was having lunch with the family. This is no theoretical issue for me.
As for the Kalam Cosmological Argument which William Lane Craig uses and promotes, that is an apologetic for the existence of God. It is not an apologetic for the origin of God - in my understanding.
Oz
Please explain that to a secular Aussie without theological understanding.
"If" the Father has a beginning it could not be by any other being.To my brothers and sisters in Christ,
I live in a secular, godless society where people deny the existence of God.
Too often they can't get to the basics and ask: You talk so much about God and his evidence in creation, but who made God?
If you were talking to a secular person in your country, how would you answer the question: Who made God?
Blessings,
Oz
NNS,
Which God? Allah? The God of Hinduism? or the God of Oneness Pentecostals?
Oz
Im just imagining what a ridged atheist would say.
Cos isn't the video and yourself saying that the question of "who made God?" is a category fallacy? If not then I must of got it mixed up
I read somewhere that even if God wrote a message in the night sky using the stars, the atheist still wouldn't admit that God exists. Granted there are atheists that are open enough to change, I did. But the most i meet won't accept anything
So I was just interested to know their reactions when u have used this argument
It’s the truth.
I needs no explanation.
JLB
That doesn't seem to be a response from someone who is open to honest discussion. Dogmatism may work with some, but not with secular Aussies.
Thats right. We need to remember that not all atheists are the same. Some are still open and in transition. Just like they shouldn't tar all Christians with the same brush.Some are so hard-headed that they are not open to this reasoning. Others (although few in number) are prepared to consider such a view.