The kjv itself has the statement in italics.it's not that reading and prayer is bad but it's one thing to have another two check.you are relying on fallable men who do translate and their bias .this is why more then one version to use will show things.I personally like the kjv but well with the catholics and other things .I have learned ,make sure it's true.people still call out the Rothschild, without them.isreal might not be where it is.yet by simply the name which one is never or seldom mentioned how can we know which one is bad as alot of people have that name and historians will debunk the stories about them.yet christians pass thar stuff as gospel.there are issues with the rcc,for sure but we can't point at them and fail to see we do some of the same things. Ie Enoch is inspired, or add traditions .place a doctrine and the person behind it with the same level about that.luther first came up with solo scriptura.you nor I live in a theological vacuum.if we didn't believe that we would be orthodox,or catholic.yet few understand how solo scriptura works. Its not just me and God but that plus another (s) in the church as lead to show and verify what the Bible says.some will know the bible better then others .no one will know the bible fully.yet many in the protestent church do follow one person. And not in depth check the teachings with a critical thinking to see if it's out of context. I'm guilty of that.we all have bias.