Well since my post are getting
deleted/edited out because the moderators cant handle the truth then this will be my last post.
Moderator Post by: Free, Jun 15, 2016 in forum: End Times
...We have previously given sound reasoning as to why the
1000 years are most likely not literal. As to Jesus's return and the resurrection, read 1 Cor. 15 and see that it signals the end and is immediately prior to the judgment.
http://christianforums.net/Fellowsh...-is-not-scriptural.64053/page-49#post-1211853
****************************************
because JLB said:
****************************************
Jesus Christ will literally come from Heaven to Earth, with His saints and literally destroy the wicked.
There will be a literal resurrection of the dead in Christ.
Those who were literally beheaded for their witness to Christ and the word of God, will sit on literal thrones and reign with the literal Christ for
1000 literal years, which is known as the Day of Rest.
1000 literal years, in which we all will rest with Him on the Seventh [prophetic] Day.
****************************************
in response to
****************************************
Jim Parker said: ↑
So you have lifted the words: "
1000 years," out of that highly symbolic, apocalyptic passage and assigned a totally literal meaning to it. That's like saying the statement, "That guy drives as slow as a snail." means that snails actually drive cars.
****************************************
JLB said:Just point out which of the bullet point statements that I made which you feel is not biblical, and we will discuss them.
Jesus Christ will literally come from Heaven to Earth, with His saints and literally destroy the wicked.
There will be a literal resurrection of the dead in Christ.
Those who were literally beheaded for their witness to Christ and the word of God, will sit on literal thrones and reign with the literal Christ for
1000 literal years, which is known as the Day of Rest.
****************************************
Jim Parker said:
This is why I spend very little time in Revelation. It's too open to interpretation and to exploitation by charlatans who want to use the imprecise language of apocalyptic literature to astound and amaze rubes with their "deep knowledge."
What you believe is not necessarily what was meant by the scriptures on which you base your personal beliefs.
************************************************************************************************
Moderator hops in and says
****************************************
Free, Jun 16, 2016
Most of the language in Rev. isn't clear, not to mention that it is part of a larger whole which we must consider as context. Notice how you have appealed to things outside of Rev. to make a point about what you think Rev. is saying? We simply cannot interpret Rev. apart from what the rest of Scripture states.
As was stated, it's a confusing book and difficult to interpret, hence the numerous differing interpretations.
****************************************
Randy said: ↑
Because of the clear language in Rev 11... I
****************************************
Jim Parker, Jun 16, 2016
I'll stop right there because those words are a very strong indication suggesting that you have no idea how to approach apocalyptic literature.
****************************************
How is this a conversation about the Book of Revelation if the majority here dispices it?
How is this a conversation about the Book of Revelation if the majority here dispices it?
How is this a conversation about the Book of Revelation if the majority here dispices it?
How is this a conversation about the Book of Revelation if the majority here dispices it?
How is this a conversation about the Book of Revelation if the majority here dispices it?
How is this a conversation about the Book of Revelation if the majority here dispices it?
How is this a conversation about the Book of Revelation if the majority here dispices it?
de·spis·es. 1. To regard with contempt or scorn 2. To dislike intensely
More Negative Revelation Garbage
*******************************************************************************
Revelation is entirely allegorical, symbolic, parable. Understanding these are a personal passion for me, but it has not resulted in conjuring up fanciful stories to sell to the masses.
smaller, Jun 20, 2016
*******************************************************************************
When Christ returns in an instant, in the twinkling of an eye, 1Corinthans 15 ;51,52, for we know not Gods timing, he then destroys the beast, false prophet and Satan casting them into the lake of fire and then those whose names are not written in the Lamb's Book of life are are also cast into the lake of fire. I don't believe in
a literal 1000 year reign of Christ where Satan is literally bound for
a 1000 years, but can only keep it withing Gods timing. I truly believe everything from the sounding of the seventh trumpet to the opening of the books will come quickly, possibly in a course of 3 1/2 years.
for_his_glory, Jun 26, 2016
#1247
http://christianforums.net/Fellowsh...-is-not-scriptural.64053/page-63#post-1215689
*******************************************************************************
Who told you the
1000 years clearly stated in scripture is not to be taken as trustworthy and true? Find out as that is who or the teaching you follow.
Randy, Jun 30, 2016
*******************************************************************************
My understanding comes straight from scripture as no one has ever taught me that of what I write other than what the Holy Spirit reveals to me
I don't believe it will be a 1000 years before Jesus cast Satan into the lake of fire, but only that of Gods timing that is not the same as our timing of hours, days and years. Why would Jesus make us wait another 1000 years to cast Satan into the lake of fire after consuming Satan's army with fire
for_his_glory, Jun 30, 2016
*******************************************************************************
I would state you are mistaken on the
1000 years as I read in rev 20.
Randy, Jun 30, 2016
*******************************************************************************
Whether the
1000 years is literal or not, which in any case is not so much prevalent, I can only draw my conclusion on that it is not a literal number, but a metaphorical numbering as in these scriptures,
Deuteronomy 7:9; 1Chronicles 16:15; Psalms 50:10; 90:4; 105:8 Ecclesiastes 6:6; 7:28, Daniel 5:1, 7:10; 2Peter 3:8
for_his_glory,
*******************************************************************************
I'm just saying that I do not know if the
1000 years is literal or not as I have only compared those scriptures that speak of t
he number 1000 with this
100 in Rev 20. It's only one of those IMO thing that is not fact based to me as of yet.
for_his_glory,
*******************************************************************************
Jesus Himself says hour not
1000 years..
reba, Monday at 10:22 AM
*******************************************************************************
There is no scripture in the Bible that says Jesus is going to reign here on earth for
1000 years with we His saints after the angle is sent to bind Satan.
for_his_glory, Monday at 5:14 PM
*******************************************************************************
Time to stop the Lies!