So how would you describe how a person comes to faith in Christ alone for salvation? How do grace, faith and election fit together in a doctrine of salvation?Yep you were the one I was talking about.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
So how would you describe how a person comes to faith in Christ alone for salvation? How do grace, faith and election fit together in a doctrine of salvation?Yep you were the one I was talking about.
Is this faith irresistible in God? Does He give it and the person cannot say no?I agree. not just logically, but simply in straight-away Truth as it is written.
..... I never saw anyone seek and come to Yhwh or Yeshua to receive salvation unless they had faith no matter how small their faith.
Since without faith it is impossible to please Yhwh, and whoever seeks Him must believe that He Is and that He Is Rewarder of those who diligently seek Him...... how or why would anyone without faith even try to find Him ?? (they're(unbelievers) busy doing something else)
Is this faith irresistible in God? Does He give it and the person cannot say no?
I consider that it does matter, because it deals with God insisting that some people are required to come into the kingdom and they have no say in accepting or rejecting it. What does that do to the rest of humanity who are not given an opportunity to believe in Christ for salvation?does it matter ?!
Once the apostles died off and the destruction of Jerusalem closed the door on returning to the safe haven of Messianic Judaism.Ok. I don't understand. These are my questions.
When do you see that the apostolic church ending and a new creation church beginning?
We share the same foundation, cornerstone, capstone as the apostolic church. However we are no longer burdened by the traditions of Messianic Judaism that they had to work through and progressively shed; a struggle which is illustrated for us in the NT.How can we be a new creation separate from the apostolic church, I think we would be without a foundation, a cornerstone, or a capstone?
They are not separated in their faith in God, but the apostolic church had the benefit of receiving the Messiah. The elect are chosen for a reason, and the reasons are different pre and post Jesus.And how can the apostolic church be separated from the elect of the OT when Abraham is the father of us all?
Yes, I do believe regeneration precedes faith. I have stated where I come from in post#88 of this thread.It seems from this post that you believe the Reformed view that regeneration precedes faith and not that it faith logically precedes faith. Do you accept the Reformed view that a person must be born again (i.e. regenerated) before he/she can have faith?
Firstly, what is it that you hold to be 'regeneration' - we must agree upon a common understanding of what we each refer to by a term, before we can discuss further on the topic.When I examine these verses, I find that faith is logically prior to salvation/regeneration/becoming born again: Luke 13:3; John 3:6-7, 16; Acts 16:31; Romans 3:24-25; 5:1; Titus 3:5-7; and 2 Peter 3:9.
Exactly. They wouldn't. And since I believe in the total depravity of man in the flesh, none, no not one, seeketh after God. Then it necessitates that this man in the flesh must be regenerated in the spirit before he seeks after God and believes in Him - hence the belief that regeneration precedes faith.how or why would anyone without faith even try to find Him ??
Elect = chosen....... But for what reason?
Joh 3:16 "For this is how God loved the world: He gave his unique Son so that everyone who believes in him might not be lost but have eternal life.
Joh 3:17 Because God sent the Son into the world, not to condemn the world, but that the world might be saved through him.
Joh 3:18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe has already been condemned, because he has not believed in the name of God's unique Son.
Joh 3:19 And this is the basis for judgment: The light has come into the world, but people loved the darkness more than the light because their actions were evil.
Joh 3:20 Everyone who practices wickedness hates the light and does not come to the light, so that his actions may not be exposed.
Joh 3:21 But whoever does what is true comes to the light, so that it may become evident that his actions have God's approval."
Once the apostles died off and the destruction of Jerusalem closed the door on returning to the safe haven of Messianic Judaism.
We share the same foundation, cornerstone, capstone as the apostolic church. However we are no longer burdened by the traditions of Messianic Judaism that they had to work through and progressively shed; a struggle which is illustrated for us in the NT.
They are not separated in their faith in God, but the apostolic church had the benefit of receiving the Messiah. The elect are chosen for a reason, and the reasons are different pre and post Jesus.
also of note: even men not of faith are told by Yhwh that they have no excuse for not believing. period. Yhwh says His Own existence is shown and proven by all creation all around us, so no one has an excuse for not believing. they cannot claim " but I wasn't regenerate so how could I believe?"
Exactly. They wouldn't. And since I believe in the total depravity of man in the flesh, none, no not one, seeketh after God. Then it necessitates that this man in the flesh must be regenerated in the spirit before he seeks after God and believes in Him - hence the belief that regeneration precedes faith.
Hmm...food for thought. Thanks for your explanation.
The idea is to get away from a contemporary all Christian context of there being regular Christians and then super 'Elect' Christians, which seems elitist. Rather we can look at it from the apostles' perspective where there are Jews and then the 'Elect' Jews who have accepted Jesus as the Messiah, and as a result are being drawn out of Judaism to form Christianity. Christianity certainly wasn't born at Pentecost because the gospel wasn't even extended to Gentiles until the Martyrdom of Stephan, and a religion that respectfully excludes Gentiles can't be Christian. The members were certainly saved, but it was a generation long process in which they metamorphosed from Jews who had found the Messiah into Christians as members of a separate religion without regard to heredity. In effect I'm likening the Apostolic Church to John the Baptist; paving the way that the New Jerusalem of Christianity could take over for the Old Jerusalem to be taken away in judgement.
I'm quite confused here. Are you stating that some have actually been found to be doers of the law? If so, then they'd have attained unto the righteousness of the law(Rom 10:5,Gal 3:12,Lev 18:5) setting them apart from even needing Christ. I do not read Rom 2 stating anyone to actually be a doer of the Law - I only see Rom 2 building the case for Rom 3:9,19.the gentiles , though unregenerate, may be found to be doers of the Law/ Word/ Torah and not just hearers and so receive a reward, Yhwh's Choice.
Nobody ever is entitled to such an excuse anyhow. Isn't this the very case of stumbling at that stumblingstone? Imagine the jewish reaction to Paul's preaching against the law - the jews thought Paul's teaching was heresy because he seemed to make void the law(Rom 3:31), giving an excuse to the people for not keeping the law with all his blanket statements such as in Gal 3:10, Rom 3:20. Can the Jew now ask - why must I be under the curse of the Law when anyway Paul claims I cannot but be found guilty under the Law? Is he entitled the excuse to being a transgressor of the Law given that none can ever be found justified by the law? If the jew is not permitted such an excuse for being unable to do the law, then similarly man(jew or gentile) is not permitted an excuse for being unable to believe in the flesh.no one has an excuse for not believing. they cannot claim " but I wasn't regenerate so how could I believe?"
Haha. I have not read any of Sproul's works, neither have I verified his clarifications/context. But if all that you state is as it is, then it's a good thing that it was Sproul being inconsistent on this and not Paul or any of the other Scripture writers.It's interesting, R.C. Sproul believes the regeneration must precede faith and yet he wrote this.....
Are you confusing the preaching of the Gospel message with actual regeneration itself? What you've observed is hyper-calvinism - an abuse of the calvinist doctrines beyond the measures it sets for itself. The Gospel message to be preached everywhere and to all is simply the same - repent and believe, and whosoever calleth upon the Lord will be saved. It is commanded of man to believe, which he chooses not to as long as he is in the flesh and for which reason he is to be justly condemned. However, If God wills to have mercy and regenerates this hardened man to be birthed in the spirit, then he is able to willingly attend to the things of the Gospel.Now if one must be regenerated (reborn) before they believe this seems like a strange thing for Paul to say. Wouldn't he have said something like....There is nothing you can do, you must wait on God to regenerate you so that you can believe.
We've already been through this very same line of argument on an earlier thread. Spurgeon was arguing against hyper-calvinism, an argument with which I concur. You obviously do not preach the Gospel to regenerate men - you preach to unregenerate men. This does not contradict the order of salvation where regeneration precedes one's attending to the things preached earlier and thereby believing in God.So what did Spurgeon say about all this.....
I see your grappling between a doctrine you hate and a preacher you love. We've been through this too earlier, and your reluctance to see it for what it is tells me I shouldn't press the issue more. Make your own conclusions on the following, I wish not to engage this argument any more -Spurgeon believed, as I do, that faith and regeneration are simultaneous, they happen at the same time.
Well it has to start with God obviously, and how He draws everyone is as different as they are. I will say that I was given the chance to be born again way before I understood it. It was on a bad acid trip with a very poor explanation of being born again. It was after another 2 years that I finally got the right teaching and circumstance that allowed me to know and confess Jesus as my savior.So how would you describe how a person comes to faith in Christ alone for salvation? How do grace, faith and election fit together in a doctrine of salvation?
That is what it says alright.
God COMMANDS all men to repent. In the matter of salvation, repentance is more than admitting that one has sinned against God. The unbelieving Jews believe they have sinned against God just as many others do.
So what is the command to repent of "unbelief in the Messiah, the Savior and Lord."
Joh 16:7 `But I tell you the truth; it is better for you that I go away, for if I may not go away, the Comforter will not come unto you, and if I go on, I will send Him unto you;
Joh 16:8 and having come, He will convict the world concerning sin, and concerning righteousness, and concerning judgment;
Joh 16:9 concerning sin indeed, because they do not believe in me;