I came back to this thread today and it has turned into a discussion of faith vs. works. Forgive my selfish tendency, but I am not particulary fond of that topic because of the divisions that occurs over misunderstandings. As such I believe we are now left only arguing semantics in futility. Faith is dead without following through in what you believe. That is simple enough to understand. Why call me Lord and not do what I say?
I would hope it is also understandable that when Paul talks about righteousness not coming through works but by faith alone, he is refering to the works of the law. And when James says men are not justified by faith alone but by works, he is not refering to the works of the law as Paul does, but to works of faith.
Having righteousness and being justified are also two different things, and so also are works of the law and works of faith. So respectfully, am I going overboard by requesting we not waste our time debating semantics and delving in what I perceive as confusion?
I would hope it is also understandable that when Paul talks about righteousness not coming through works but by faith alone, he is refering to the works of the law. And when James says men are not justified by faith alone but by works, he is not refering to the works of the law as Paul does, but to works of faith.
Having righteousness and being justified are also two different things, and so also are works of the law and works of faith. So respectfully, am I going overboard by requesting we not waste our time debating semantics and delving in what I perceive as confusion?