smaller
Member
- Oct 23, 2003
- 12,380
- 664
To me to tell someone who has been circumcised with spiritual circumcision that they still have s sinful nature (which I have heard) is far different from telling someone they have a divine nature but sometimes sins. They will identify themselves either as Saint or Sinner which will determine in their own minds their identity as a child or not. This will then produce further ramifications in their walk, it will either be in grace or works. I must not sin to get Gods love rather than I identify with the nature I have been given by Christ and I so much want to be like him because he is in my and me in him, he loves me and I love him, not I must show him I love him by ridding myself of the sinful nature that I have been told I still have.
Does that make sense?
Not at all.
Paul explained clearly that there was him as a child of God and sin that was in his flesh that was not him, and that the Spirit is against.
The utterly false notion that "most" christians try to apply is that they are only ONE THING and they disregard their flesh and it's factual state as a condition that can not be changed, can not be blessed, can not be condoned by the Spirit.
These questions are never that God is only for us. That was never the case.
God is and remains firmly against the evil that is present with all of us REGARDLESS of how much nice religious paint we put on our flesh or how imaginatively rosily optimistic we like to see our flesh. None of this is true. It is spiritual deception.