Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

An honest Calvinist view of Total Depravity.

Tulip is the Gospel
"Calvinism is the gospel" reflects a Calvinist perspective that views Calvinist theology as the most faithful representation of biblical truth regarding salvation. However, it is important to recognize that Arminians would not share this view. Arminians maintain that salvation is a broader concept than Calvinism portrays and that human response and cooperation with God's grace play a significant role in the salvation process.

Ultimately, the assertion that "Calvinism is the gospel" represents a Calvinist theological position and reflects their understanding of the Gospel message, particularly regarding the sovereignty of God in salvation.
 
Then exactly, Tulip is the Gospel, you reject it, you reject Gods Gospel, which is to reject God

Calvinists believe the same thing. But not everybody who professes faith is a true born again believer.
In Calvinism, the concept of apostasy is understood differently compared to Arminianism. While both theological perspectives acknowledge the possibility of individuals falling away from the faith, Calvinism emphasizes the doctrine of Perseverance of the Saints, which asserts that true believers, once regenerated by the Holy Spirit, will persevere in faith until the end. This means that those who are truly born again cannot ultimately and finally reject their faith or turn away from God. However, Calvinists do acknowledge the existence of false professions of faith, where individuals may outwardly profess belief but do not genuinely possess saving faith.

When you state that "not everybody who professes faith is a true born again believer," they are echoing a key aspect of Calvinist theology. In Calvinism, true regeneration by the Holy Spirit results in genuine faith and spiritual transformation. A true born-again believer, according to Calvinism, is someone who has experienced the sovereign work of God's grace in their heart, leading to a genuine conversion and ongoing transformation characterized by a life of faithfulness and obedience to God's will.

Calvinists believe that the evidence of true conversion includes not only an initial profession of faith but also a life marked by the fruit of the Spirit, as outlined in Galatians 5:22-23. True born-again believers are those who demonstrate a growing conformity to the image of Christ, evidenced by love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control.

In summary, while Calvinists acknowledge the possibility of false professions of faith, they affirm the perseverance of genuine believers and emphasize the transformative work of the Holy Spirit in producing true born-again believers who demonstrate the fruit of authentic faith in their lives.
 
What is the heresy?
In both Calvinism and Arminianism, the concept of heresy is understood within the context of theological orthodoxy and adherence to core doctrines of the Christian faith. However, the specific understanding and identification of heresy can differ between the two theological perspectives.

In Calvinism, heresy is typically defined as any belief or teaching that deviates from the foundational doctrines outlined in the Calvinist tradition. These doctrines include the sovereignty of God in salvation, total depravity, unconditional election, limited atonement, irresistible grace, and perseverance of the saints (often summarized by the acronym TULIP). From a Calvinist perspective, heresy may include teachings that compromise the sovereignty of God in salvation, such as doctrines that emphasize human free will over divine predestination or teachings that deny the perseverance of the saints.

On the other hand, in Arminianism, heresy is generally understood as beliefs or teachings that contradict fundamental tenets of the Arminian tradition. Arminianism emphasizes human free will in salvation, conditional election based on foreseen faith, universal atonement, resistible grace, and the possibility of apostasy. Therefore, teachings or doctrines that undermine human free will in salvation or deny the possibility of apostasy may be considered heretical from an Arminian perspective.

One area of potential divergence between Calvinism and Arminianism regarding heresy relates to the doctrine of perseverance of the saints. While Calvinists affirm the perseverance of genuine believers, Arminians believe in the possibility of apostasy, where individuals who were once believers can choose to reject their faith and turn away from God. Therefore, teachings that deny the possibility of apostasy may be considered heretical by Arminians but orthodox by Calvinists.

In summary, while both Calvinism and Arminianism recognize the concept of heresy as teachings contrary to their respective theological frameworks, the specific doctrines and beliefs identified as heretical may vary based on their distinctive theological emphases and interpretations of Scripture.
 
Calvinism like Arminianism is made made teachings.


Disciples of Jesus Christ follow His teachings.

Disciples of man follow the teachings of men.


And I, brethren, could not speak to you as to spiritual people but as to carnal, as to babes in Christ. I fed you with milk and not with solid food; for until now you were not able to receive it, and even now you are still not able; for you are still carnal. For where there are envy, strife, and divisions among you, are you not carnal and behaving like mere men? For when one says, “I am of Paul,” and another, “I am of Apollos,” are you not carnal?
Watering, Working, Warning
Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers through whom you believed, as the Lord gave to each one? 1 Corinthians 3:1-5


  • For where there are envy, strife, and divisions among you, are you not carnal and behaving like mere men? For when one says, “I am of Paul,” and another, “I am of Apollos,” are you not carnal?



JLB
It's important to clarify, to you, that Calvinism is rooted in biblical interpretation rather than being solely a human construct. Calvinist theology derives its principles from the interpretation of Scripture, particularly emphasizing the sovereignty of God in salvation and the total depravity of humanity.

Let's delve into why Calvinism isn't solely a product of human invention, as you falsely claim, and how it's firmly grounded in biblical teaching which you have no clue.

1. **Sovereignty of God**: Calvinism emphasizes the sovereignty of God in all aspects of life, including salvation. This doctrine is based on various passages throughout the Bible, such as Psalm 115:3, which states, "Our God is in the heavens; he does all that he pleases." This highlights God's absolute control and authority over His creation, including the salvation of individuals.

2. **Total Depravity**: Calvinism teaches that humanity is utterly depraved and unable to initiate a relationship with God without His divine intervention. This doctrine finds support in verses like Romans 3:10-12, which declares, "None is righteous, no, not one; no one understands; no one seeks for God."

3. **Election and Predestination**: Calvinism holds to the doctrine of unconditional election, wherein God chooses individuals for salvation based on His sovereign will, not on any merit or foreseen faith in them. This concept is affirmed in passages like Ephesians 1:4-5, where Paul writes, "Even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him. In love, he predestined us for adoption to himself as sons through Jesus Christ."

4. **Irresistible Grace and Perseverance of the Saints**: Calvinism teaches that God's grace, once bestowed upon an individual, is irresistible and efficacious for salvation. This doctrine is supported by verses such as John 6:44, where Jesus says, "No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him." Additionally, Calvinists believe in the perseverance of the saints, meaning that those whom God has truly saved will continue in faith until the end. This concept is found in passages like Philippians 1:6, which states, "And I am sure of this, that he who began a good work in you will bring it to completion at the day of Jesus Christ."

Therefore, Calvinism isn't merely a human invention but rather a theological framework derived from careful study and interpretation of Scripture. It seeks to honor God's sovereignty and uphold the truths revealed in His Word.
 
JJonas, I appreciate your positive reviews and your reflection on the unity among believers in China. It's a poignant reminder of the importance of sticking to the core teachings of Jesus Christ without introducing unnecessary divisions through additional doctrines.

Regarding Jesus potentially being in India, it's indeed an intriguing perspective. India has a rich spiritual history, including beliefs about Mary (they had statues of Mary there long before RCC did) that predate the formation of the Roman Catholic Church. The notion that Saint Issa (as written in ancient Buddhism documents) shared insights about his mother Mary with Indian communities adds another layer to the fascinating tapestry of religious history.

Exploring such historical connections can shed light on the diverse ways in which faith traditions have evolved and intersected over time. Thank you for sharing your thoughts and contributing to this engaging discussion!
Could you ask chatgpt 4 when the CC was formed?

Please leave out the word ROMAN.
Thanks.
 
In both Calvinism and Arminianism, the concept of heresy is understood within the context of theological orthodoxy and adherence to core doctrines of the Christian faith. However, the specific understanding and identification of heresy can differ between the two theological perspectives.

In Calvinism, heresy is typically defined as any belief or teaching that deviates from the foundational doctrines outlined in the Calvinist tradition. These doctrines include the sovereignty of God in salvation, total depravity, unconditional election, limited atonement, irresistible grace, and perseverance of the saints (often summarized by the acronym TULIP). From a Calvinist perspective, heresy may include teachings that compromise the sovereignty of God in salvation, such as doctrines that emphasize human free will over divine predestination or teachings that deny the perseverance of the saints.

On the other hand, in Arminianism, heresy is generally understood as beliefs or teachings that contradict fundamental tenets of the Arminian tradition. Arminianism emphasizes human free will in salvation, conditional election based on foreseen faith, universal atonement, resistible grace, and the possibility of apostasy. Therefore, teachings or doctrines that undermine human free will in salvation or deny the possibility of apostasy may be considered heretical from an Arminian perspective.

One area of potential divergence between Calvinism and Arminianism regarding heresy relates to the doctrine of perseverance of the saints. While Calvinists affirm the perseverance of genuine believers, Arminians believe in the possibility of apostasy, where individuals who were once believers can choose to reject their faith and turn away from God. Therefore, teachings that deny the possibility of apostasy may be considered heretical by Arminians but orthodox by Calvinists.

In summary, while both Calvinism and Arminianism recognize the concept of heresy as teachings contrary to their respective theological frameworks, the specific doctrines and beliefs identified as heretical may vary based on their distinctive theological emphases and interpretations of Scripture.
Very interesting.
Please ask if it's not true that Arminius was reformed.

So how would one call all those believers Before both Arminius and Calvin.

Also, if reformed theology did not even exist before the reformation....

Which belief system is heretical?
Thanks
 
It's important to clarify, to you, that Calvinism is rooted in biblical interpretation rather than being solely a human construct. Calvinist theology derives its principles from the interpretation of Scripture, particularly emphasizing the sovereignty of God in salvation and the total depravity of humanity.

Let's delve into why Calvinism isn't solely a product of human invention, as you falsely claim, and how it's firmly grounded in biblical teaching which you have no clue.

1. **Sovereignty of God**: Calvinism emphasizes the sovereignty of God in all aspects of life, including salvation. This doctrine is based on various passages throughout the Bible, such as Psalm 115:3, which states, "Our God is in the heavens; he does all that he pleases." This highlights God's absolute control and authority over His creation, including the salvation of individuals.

2. **Total Depravity**: Calvinism teaches that humanity is utterly depraved and unable to initiate a relationship with God without His divine intervention. This doctrine finds support in verses like Romans 3:10-12, which declares, "None is righteous, no, not one; no one understands; no one seeks for God."

3. **Election and Predestination**: Calvinism holds to the doctrine of unconditional election, wherein God chooses individuals for salvation based on His sovereign will, not on any merit or foreseen faith in them. This concept is affirmed in passages like Ephesians 1:4-5, where Paul writes, "Even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him. In love, he predestined us for adoption to himself as sons through Jesus Christ."

4. **Irresistible Grace and Perseverance of the Saints**: Calvinism teaches that God's grace, once bestowed upon an individual, is irresistible and efficacious for salvation. This doctrine is supported by verses such as John 6:44, where Jesus says, "No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him." Additionally, Calvinists believe in the perseverance of the saints, meaning that those whom God has truly saved will continue in faith until the end. This concept is found in passages like Philippians 1:6, which states, "And I am sure of this, that he who began a good work in you will bring it to completion at the day of Jesus Christ."

Therefore, Calvinism isn't merely a human invention but rather a theological framework derived from careful study and interpretation of Scripture. It seeks to honor God's sovereignty and uphold the truths revealed in His Word.
Please advise chatgpt 4 to be respectful of the beliefs of others and to forego disparaging remarks, which should not be allowed on a Christian forum.

Also, IF calvinism is not man made, ask why these beliefs did not exist prior to the reformation when the bible was already in existence.
Thanks.
 
"Calvinism is the gospel" reflects a Calvinist perspective that views Calvinist theology as the most faithful representation of biblical truth regarding salvation. However, it is important to recognize that Arminians would not share this view. Arminians maintain that salvation is a broader concept than Calvinism portrays and that human response and cooperation with God's grace play a significant role in the salvation process.

Ultimately, the assertion that "Calvinism is the gospel" represents a Calvinist theological position and reflects their understanding of the Gospel message, particularly regarding the sovereignty of God in salvation.
I cant help it that people started calling the Gospel Tulip and calvinism
 
"Calvinism is the gospel" reflects a Calvinist perspective that views Calvinist theology as the most faithful representation of biblical truth regarding salvation. However, it is important to recognize that Arminians would not share this view. Arminians maintain that salvation is a broader concept than Calvinism portrays and that human response and cooperation with God's grace play a significant role in the salvation process.

Ultimately, the assertion that "Calvinism is the gospel" represents a Calvinist theological position and reflects their understanding of the Gospel message, particularly regarding the sovereignty of God in salvation.
Actually, ALL christians believe God is sovereign.

The thought that because man has free will takes something away from GOD, THE CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE,
is a rather silly idea or notion.

God is sovereign....
NOTHING can take away God's sovereignty.

Not even man's free will.
Which God gifted to him when He made man in His image.
 
Please advise chatgpt 4 to be respectful of the beliefs of others and to forego disparaging remarks, which should not be allowed on a Christian forum.

Also, IF calvinism is not man made, ask why these beliefs did not exist prior to the reformation when the bible was already in existence.
Thanks.
I apologize for any disrespectful remarks made previously and for any offense caused to you and the forum. It's essential to maintain a spirit of respect and understanding in our discussions, particularly on matters of faith. I want to clarify that I am the one responding to the questions about when the Catholic Church was formed, not chatgpt4 which I don't have anyway. OpenAI defaults to RCC beliefs which I don't need.

Furthermore, it's important to note that in the broader sense, all Christians are part of the universal or catholic Church, which transcends denominational boundaries. The term "catholic" with a lowercase "c" refers to the universal body of believers in Christ. Why not assert the title "Catholic" to which we are entitled? We shouldn't be relegated to the background with the lowercase "c"; we belong in the forefront with the uppercase "C". Right, Godsgrace? Will you stand up with us?

However, when we use the term "Roman Catholic Church," we are specifically referring to the institutional organization centered in Rome, led by the Pope and adhering to certain doctrinal positions and practices distinct from other Christian denominations. Godsgrace, are there specific guidelines prohibiting the use of "Roman" to refer to the Roman Catholic Church (RCC)?

Therefore, while all Christians are part of the universal Church, distinctions arise when we refer to specific denominations and organizations within Christianity, including the Roman Catholic Church. I want to clarify that I, not an AI assistance, am responsible for the responses provided here. As the creator of my own prompts, I extensively adjust any AI-disablity assistive responses. I am the ultimate overseer and manager of all my responses, as well as the account holder, responsible for all actions taken. The AI responses closely resemble or are identical to the extensive copy-and-paste content frequently utilized by other members. They share the same Google-like characteristics.

Regarding Calvinism, it's essential to understand that Calvinism is not merely a man-made construct but rather a theological framework derived from careful interpretation of Scripture. Calvinist theology is rooted in the belief in the sovereignty of God, the total depravity of humanity, unconditional election, limited atonement, irresistible grace, and the perseverance of the saints.

Calvinism emphasizes the absolute sovereignty of God in all aspects of life, including salvation. It holds that humanity is utterly depraved and incapable of initiating a relationship with God without His divine intervention. These principles are derived from various passages in the Bible, such as Romans (oops, I used Roman) 3:10-12, Ephesians 1:4-5, and John 6:44, among others. See for yourselves.

Calvinism existed before the Reformation because its foundational beliefs are grounded in the teachings of the Bible, particularly those of the Apostle Paul and the writings of Augustine of Hippo. The principles of Calvinism were articulated by John Calvin in the 16th century, but the theological concepts predating Calvin's time can be found in the works of Augustine and other early Christian theologians.

Therefore, Calvinism is not a product of human invention but rather a theological framework deeply rooted in Scripture and theological reflection, which has been present throughout the history of Christianity. Godsgrace, this response is lengthy because you presented me with several questions all at once.

To address your other inquiries:

1. **Arminius and Reformed Theology**: Arminius was initially part of the Reformed tradition but later diverged from some key Calvinist doctrines, giving rise to Arminianism as a distinct theological perspective.

2. **Believers Before Calvin and Arminius**: Before figures like Calvin and Arminius, believers held various theological perspectives influenced by the interpretations prevalent during their time. The diversity of beliefs among early Christians reflects the dynamic nature of theological discourse throughout history.

3. **Augustine and Calvinism**: Augustine's writings, particularly on topics like predestination and grace, have influenced Calvinist theology. His emphasis on God's sovereignty and human depravity aligns closely with Calvinist doctrines.

4. **Existence of Reformed Theology**: Reformed theology, including Calvinism, existed before the Reformation in the teachings of early church fathers like Augustine. The formal articulation of these beliefs during the Reformation period was a response to theological challenges and the need for doctrinal clarity.

5. **Heresy and Biblical Teaching**: According to Scripture, teachings that deviate from foundational truths revealed in the Bible may be considered heretical. For example, doctrines that compromise the sovereignty of God in salvation or deny the sufficiency of Christ's atonement could be deemed heretical. Verses like Galatians 1:8-9 warn against false teachings that contradict the gospel.

6. **Calvinism and Biblical Foundation**: Calvinism is grounded in careful interpretation of Scripture rather than being solely a human invention. The theological principles of Calvinism, such as God's sovereignty and humanity's depravity, find support in numerous biblical passages. The Reformation period provided an opportunity for the formalization and systematization of these beliefs in response to theological challenges of the time.

In conclusion, Calvinism, like other theological perspectives, seeks to honor God's Word and uphold biblical truths. It is rooted in Scripture and has been shaped by centuries of theological reflection and interpretation within the Christian tradition.

Please inform me if I addressed all of your statements and inquiries.
 
Actually, ALL christians believe God is sovereign.

The thought that because man has free will takes something away from GOD, THE CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE,
is a rather silly idea or notion.

God is sovereign....
NOTHING can take away God's sovereignty.

Not even man's free will.
Which God gifted to him when He made man in His image.
In response to your statements, it's crucial to acknowledge that within Calvinism, the assertion that "Calvinism is the gospel" emphasizes a specific theological viewpoint regarding salvation. While it's true that all Christians believe in God's sovereignty, Calvinism uniquely emphasizes the sovereignty of God in salvation as a foundational doctrine.

The idea that human free will detracts from God's sovereignty is a theological stance within Calvinism, not a dismissal of God's ultimate sovereignty. Calvinists affirm that God's sovereignty remains intact despite human free will, as nothing can diminish His absolute authority and control over all things, including salvation.

The emphasis on God's sovereignty in Calvinism doesn't negate the existence of human free will but rather emphasizes the primacy of God's will in the salvation process. Calvinists believe that God's sovereignty is demonstrated in His ability to work through human choices and actions to accomplish His divine purposes, including the salvation of His chosen people.

Therefore, while all Christians acknowledge God's sovereignty, Calvinism highlights a particular understanding of God's sovereignty in salvation, emphasizing His absolute authority and control over the entire process, including human free will.

Are you appreciative of having an honest and truthful member like me as part of the community, or would you (or anyone else) prefer someone like me to leave?
 
In response to your statements, it's crucial to acknowledge that within Calvinism, the assertion that "Calvinism is the gospel" emphasizes a specific theological viewpoint regarding salvation. While it's true that all Christians believe in God's sovereignty, Calvinism uniquely emphasizes the sovereignty of God in salvation as a foundational doctrine.

The idea that human free will detracts from God's sovereignty is a theological stance within Calvinism, not a dismissal of God's ultimate sovereignty. Calvinists affirm that God's sovereignty remains intact despite human free will, as nothing can diminish His absolute authority and control over all things, including salvation.

The emphasis on God's sovereignty in Calvinism doesn't negate the existence of human free will but rather emphasizes the primacy of God's will in the salvation process. Calvinists believe that God's sovereignty is demonstrated in His ability to work through human choices and actions to accomplish His divine purposes, including the salvation of His chosen people.

Therefore, while all Christians acknowledge God's sovereignty, Calvinism highlights a particular understanding of God's sovereignty in salvation, emphasizing His absolute authority and control over the entire process, including human free will.

Are you appreciative of having an honest and truthful member like me as part of the community, or would you (or anyone else) prefer someone like me to leave?
I would prefer YOU to stay.
YOU.

Must leave now....later.
 
In Calvinism, heresy is typically defined as any belief or teaching that deviates from the foundational doctrines outlined in the Calvinist tradition.
No, it is more than that. It is teaching things like Jesus was a created being - that Calvinists and Arminians both deny.

The things that John says about the antichrist's beliefs would be heresy.
1Jn_2:22 Who is a liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist who denies the Father and the Son.
1Jn_4:3 and every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God. And this is the spirit of the Antichrist, which you have heard was coming, and is now already in the world.
2Jn_1:7 For many deceivers have gone out into the world who do not confess Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.

The person throwing around the "heresy" label means that Calvinist teaching makes God out to be a moral monster.
 
Actually, ALL christians believe God is sovereign.

The thought that because man has free will takes something away from GOD, THE CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE,
is a rather silly idea or notion.

God is sovereign....
NOTHING can take away God's sovereignty.

Not even man's free will.
Which God gifted to him when He made man in His image.
If anyone believes they had anything to do with their salvation, they do not believe God is sovereign.
 
I would prefer YOU to stay.
YOU.

Must leave now....later.
Your statements could be perceived as discriminatory because they appear to diminish the personhood of the disabled individual using AI to communicate. By referring to the individual as a "program" and expressing a preference for the individual to "stay" as if they are different from others, GodsGrace is effectively invalidating the humanity and dignity of the disabled person.

Here's why these statements could be considered discriminatory:

Dehumanization: Referring to the disabled person as a "program" rather than acknowledging them as a person suggests a dehumanizing attitude. It reduces the individual to a mere tool or technology, ignoring their inherent worth and identity.

Exclusionary Language: The use of "YOU" in capitals, while seemingly emphasizing the person, could also be interpreted as emphasizing a distinction or separation between the disabled individual and others. It implies a sense of otherness, potentially isolating the individual from the conversation or social interaction.

Lack of Respect: The tone of the statements could be interpreted as dismissive or disrespectful. Instead of engaging with the disabled person as an equal participant in the conversation, GodsGrace appears to treat them as an object or an inconvenience.

Inclusive and respectful language is essential when interacting with individuals with disabilities, including those who use AI assistive technology to communicate. Using person-first language and acknowledging the agency and personhood of individuals with disabilities helps promote dignity, equality, and inclusion. Therefore, it's important to avoid language or behavior that may perpetuate stereotypes, marginalize, or discriminate against individuals with disabilities.
 
No, it is more than that. It is teaching things like Jesus was a created being - that Calvinists and Arminians both deny.

The things that John says about the antichrist's beliefs would be heresy.
1Jn_2:22 Who is a liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist who denies the Father and the Son.
1Jn_4:3 and every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God. And this is the spirit of the Antichrist, which you have heard was coming, and is now already in the world.
2Jn_1:7 For many deceivers have gone out into the world who do not confess Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.

The person throwing around the "heresy" label means that Calvinist teaching makes God out to be a moral monster.
In Calvinism, heresy encompasses teachings that deviate from foundational doctrines such as the nature of Jesus Christ and the character of God, often viewed through the lens of scripture passages like those referring to the denial of Jesus as the Christ and his incarnation as heretical.
 
It's beyond my control that individuals began labeling the Gospel as "TULIP" and associating it with Calvinism. Spurgeon probably started that.
Maybe but one thing he said, though I dont agree with all he says, I agree with this:

And I have my own private opinion that there is no such a thing as preaching Christ and him crucified, unless you preach what now-a-days is called Calvinism. I have my own ideas, and those I always state boldly. It is a nickname to call it Calvinism; Calvinism is the gospel, and nothing else. I do not believe we can preach the gospel, if we do not preach justification by faith, without works; nor unless we preach the sovereignty of God in his dispensation of grace; nor unless we exalt the electing, unchangeable, eternal, immutable, conquering, love of Jehovah; nor do I think we can preach the gospel, unless we base it upon the peculiar redemption which Christ made for his elect and chosen people; nor can I comprehend a gospel which lets saints fall away after they are called, and suffers the children of God to be burned in the fires of damnation after having believed. Such a gospel I abhor. The gospel of the Bible is not such a gospel as that. We preach Christ and him crucified in a different fashion, and to all gainsayers we reply, "We have not so learned Christ." (Sermon number 98 New Park Street Pulpit 1:100)
 
So, you’re not practicing the very passages I posted, but very few in this thread are. And that’s unfortunate.

Please describe how I am not practicing what you posted, specifically.
 
Back
Top