Ryan
Member
I think the obvious question here is not which of the two but which of the 10 is the least as the topic is the 10?
Jesus was speaking very clearly here of the 10. He lays out what He means by every jot and tittle. He is making it very clear to them that they cannot and have not obeyed every jot and tittle. But verse 5:17 is the explanation.
Matthew 5:17
Young's Literal Translation (YLT)
17 `Do not suppose that I came to throw down the law or the prophets -- I did not come to throw down, but to fulfill;
Why did He fulfill the law and the prophets, so we could live by grace through faith, imputed with His righteousness because there was no way we could fulfill the law. Obedience to every jot and tittle is too much for us to bear and be judged by. Just as when Peter says at the counsel in Jerusalem when addressing the Judizers. That they should not put the burden on the Gentiles that was too much for them and their father's to bear. Peter understood the EVERY jot and tittle and that to try to be justified by the jot and tittle was a great burden. He understood that Jesus was the Savior by grace and faith, He understood that He was the justifier because He obeyed every jot and tittle. for this reason only do we not have to fulfill the 10. But we are commanded to walk in the Spirit thus producing God's love in us.
The conclusion is this
48 ye shall therefore be perfect, as your Father who [is] in the heavens is perfect.
I do not condemn anyone for them observing feasts, sabbaths, or any other things they do in regards to the law and prophets. I just object to some (mostly christians churches) teaching justification by grace and faith + the 10. They don't seem to understand that they are not teaching the new covenant but the old.
I cannot interpret that verse as being solely exclusive to the just the "10". Try and pick one that isn't a least with those ten. What Jesus is referring to here as the least are verses such as Deuteronomy 22:11 (mixing wool and linen together), Numbers 15:38 (tallitz). That's the least of the commandments that I can glean from.
Fulfill has no meaning to abolish, and I said previously, is not a checklist that we no longer have to do so cause Jesus obeyed for us. That would be foolish to suggest otherwise. How many of us have made marriage vows when we were married. Marriage is very much a covenant act. We say through sickness and health, richer or poorer, be faithful, love and to hold, etc, etc. So after we do all that, is that covenant and vow no longer valid? Of course not, the covenant is continuous and renewed each waking day we spend our life together with our spouse. Just because we successfully complete it each day, no longer annuls the vow, it fulfills it.
We can argue about whether we are under the Old Covenant or the more accurate term "Renewed Covenant" instead of the popular term New Covenant. But covenants were built upon each other. If you have ever renewed your wedding vows, does it in any way annul the first set of vows you made? Galatians 3:17-18 speaks to this "What I am saying is this: the Law, which came four hundred and thirty years later, does not invalidate a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to nullify the promise. 18 For if the inheritance is based on law, it is no longer based on a promise; but God has granted it to Abraham by means of a promise."
There is the Abrahamic Convenat and the Sinai Convenant being spoken of here. One Covenant does not nullify another. What Law will be written on our hearts? It's the Torah of course. It's the God breathed set of instructions that he gave to Moses.
The Law has been poorly translated from the GReek word "nomos". If you go to where it came from the original language, it is accurately the Torah. The Torah does not mean God's authoritative and oppressive laws that are meant to bind one to cruely and slavery. Torah actually means God's "instructions" and "teachings" and "revelations." Poor translations, poor interpretations and poor theology has continued to perpetuate this mis truth about what the Law/Torah really is. I hope you will go out and discover the same conclusions that I have come to about what exactly it is when we say the Law. Lets maybe define that first and the roots what the Law exactly is.