Jethro Bodine
Member
I'm sure that's exactly what he's saying. Linguistically, you can see how 'righteousnesses's of the law', and 'righteousness of the law' mean the same thing.However, Paul could be saying, we uphold the righteousness of the law.
No, because I pointed out that, grammatically, the law of Moses--the law he just said can not justify--is what does not get nullified, but upheld. IOW, in the passage it's impossible that the law that does not get nullified is a different law than what gets upheld.Or he could be saying that if they, the Jews, put their faith in Christ they would not be nullifying Moses' Law but they would be upholding God's moral law.
"28 For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law.
31 Do we then nullify the Law (that can not justify) through faith? May it never be! On the contrary, we establish the Law (that can not justify)." (Romans 3:28,31 NASB)
It's impossible to separate 'not nullifying the law', and 'upholding the law', as if they aren't talking about the same thing. Not nullifying the law IS upholding the law.