I meant that at the time the Jerusalem council met in Acts 15, there were no churches (buildings). They met in synagogues on Sabbath and in homes throughout the week.
Jas 2:1 My brethren, have not the faith of our Master Yeshua Messiah, the Master of glory, with respect of persons.
Jas 2:2 For if there come unto your assembly (Greek - sunagoge) a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man in vile raiment;
In context knowing that James was speaking to a group of Messianic Jews, I would say that they, being Jews probably still went to hear the reading of the Torah and the Prophets just as they had before. I think I probably would have done that if I were one of them. We know that there were discussions about the writings at their assemblies as well. I would not have wanted to give that up. We know the Messiah went to the synagogue and Paul to instruct and to show the Messiah written in the prophets. I also think James may have been referring to a specific assembly that took place in the synagogue. If we read on he mentions ...
Jas 2:6 and ye did dishonour the poor one; do not the rich oppress you and
themselves draw you to judgment-seats;
Jas 2:7 do they not
themselves speak evil of the good name that was called upon you?
It seems he may be referring to a courtroom situation. We know the Jews settled criminal and civil cases in the synagogues before the Sandrium (I think it was them). So I would think this would have still been the case in a circumstance with another Jew who was not a convert.
Now I know why I did not understand you. Paul was not the speaker in Acts 15:20. It was James. Why would the Gentiles need those things if the law was abolished? Three of those things are OT dietary laws.
Sorry again for my confusing you, yes James was speaker and I appreciate your making that clear, it's important.
YLT
Act 15:28 `For it seemed
good to the Holy Spirit, and to us, no more burden to lay upon you,
except these necessary things:
Act 15:29 to abstain from things offered to idols, and blood, and a strangled thing, and whoredom; from which keeping yourselves, ye shall do well; be strong!'
James says, these are the necessary things. Yes, these same things were said to the chosen people before the cross and they are still the necessary things for the chosen people after the cross.
Fornication is a given for all YHVH's people. Which actually is a type of idolatry.
If we were eating things offered to pagan idols we would be worshiping false gods rather than the one true God. Also a given for all YHVH's people.
The blood commandment goes all the way back to Noah, in Genesis 9.
YLT
Gen 9:3 Every creeping thing that is alive, to you it is for food; as the green herb I have given to you the whole;
Gen 9:4 only flesh in its life--
its blood--ye do not eat.
Gen 9:5 `And
only your blood for your lives do I require; from the hand of every living thing I require it, and from the hand of man, from the hand of every man's brother I require the life of man;
The blood is only for atonement and should not be considered a common thing or the same as the flesh. It is the life of all flesh. Animal blood in the OT as a shadow of the blood of Christ for remission of sin. And not to be eaten or offered to false pagan gods.
Strangulation would cause much suffering to the beast and here again is the blood not being let.
There were several practices among the pagans that are spoken of in the OT. They were told not to cut themselves when in mourning as the pagans did.
I think all these things had to do with idolatrous practices that many of the gentiles had been involved in. I think Genesis 9:4, is the best explanation about the blood.
That is the best that I can understand it. Maybe you can add to that understanding.