Read them carefully.... what does He say to Mary? Read the whole passage.Lol, Reba, you're funny.
Not one of those verses said anything about his return.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Read them carefully.... what does He say to Mary? Read the whole passage.Lol, Reba, you're funny.
Not one of those verses said anything about his return.
Please, you're causing a ruckus while we have church.
Well, you have a good imagination anyway.
Why don't you get the pastor of your church on here and we'll hear what he has to say.
Don't let your imagination run away with you.Read them carefully.... what does He say to Mary? Read the whole passage.
My Bible does not contradict.Acts is pretty clear Jesus didn't ascend into heaven on a horse. Perhaps your bible mentions a horse.
Revelation 21:22-23;For some one who says Jesus is a literal lamb I am not surprise you refuse see the above :tongue
I am sorry but that is a weak statement. All positions on this subject, the Lord's Day, can be considered theory and by some circle of studied people each is. As I said earlier, this is not a Salvic topic and is not one I am willing to be dogmatic about. Failing to teach it because some might fall away when the father has included the scriptures teaching it as a distinct possibility is a good bit to arrogant for me to ever want any part of. In my class when this came up I taught all three major positions and always clarified my personal preference because I want to be fair and blameless here. I am not nearly as smart as God and He left this subject in a bit of a fog and He is perfect meaning He does nothing without a reason. Remember, we are, every one of us born with the same amount of faith and we all, at some point decide where to put it. And I stand firmly in position and if another falls away, were they saved? If they were, they are and if they were not, nothing, in truth, changed. What is between you and our God, I do not control, nor should I ever blow my ego so large as to fool myself.
Rev 14:17 fits in with the Parable of the Wheat and Tares. Here the sickle is applied to the tares, which are destined for burning. Rev 14 is all about God's wrath against the unbelieving and the ungodly. Hence the river of blood which flows out at Armageddon.If the verses you are using are talking about a pre-trib rapture, them where does Revelation 14:17 fit in?
And when does that happen?Rev 14:17 fits in with the Parable of the Wheat and Tares. Here the sickle is applied to the tares, which are destined for burning. Rev 14 is all about God's wrath against the unbelieving and the ungodly. Hence the river of blood which flows out at Armageddon.
Not necessarily speaking of the last poster.Snarks are a no no Reba
see Rollo...........I told you so!!!
see Rollo...........I told you so!!!
maybe some toe jam but no roachesWatch it!
I see a cockroach down by your feet!
please provide the scriptures for you statement please. Thank youChrist returns with the "clouds" ...rapture.
Then a second time on a white horse.
To me...and many others there are two returns.
If you take notice in Rev 14:14-20 there are two angels as the first one reaps the harvest,(cross reference Matthew 13:30, 39) which are we the saints of God and the second angle thrust in his sickle and reaps the tares as now the two have been separated. Looks like we are still here!Rev 14:17 fits in with the Parable of the Wheat and Tares. Here the sickle is applied to the tares, which are destined for burning. Rev 14 is all about God's wrath against the unbelieving and the ungodly. Hence the river of blood which flows out at Armageddon.
That is simply an assumption -- reading into the text what is not there. You will not find the word *saint* in this chapter, but you will find the word *earth*. The *harvest of the earth* is not *the harvest of the saints*. The *vine of the earth* is not Christ the Vine. Please note how many time *earth* appears in this small passage. This is the harvest of the *tares* since the *wheat* is already safely in the barn.If you take notice in Rev 14:14-20 there are two angels as the first one reaps the harvest,(cross reference Matthew 13:30, 39) which are we the saints of God
The entire Tribulation period (which includes the Great Tribulation) is a time when the unbelieving and the ungodly are *harvested* (Rev 6-18) through the judgements which come upon the earth. The battle of Armageddon (Rev 14:18-20) is the culmination of that harvest, during which the wrath of God is poured out upon the earth. Hence *earth* is mentioned again and again. This is not a period reserved for the saints.And when does that happen?