Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
what if we have a Judea, florida? lolMat_24:16 Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains:
Seems only those in Judea need to flee...
The real quick answer is i asked God to open His Word to me ... let me read scripture with out the years of preconceived knowledge i had built up. I had a life time of thoughts ... Lord help me read the Word like reading it for the first time... I saw passages and connections in a different light . I dont believe it is a Salvation thing... i was just as saved 25 years ago as i am today.. The Scriptures are more alive , they hold more comfort, so much more positive to my thinking...
Odd ezrider brought up the Kingdom... This Scripture was one of the turning points.. Rom 14:17 For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.
WOW it hit me His kingdom is not some where in the future the Holy Ghost is for today.. Luk_12:32 Fear not, little flock; for it is your Father's good pleasure to give you the kingdom. there is more detail not for tonight
Why do you believe the way you do Kathi..
I did the exact same thing So we come up with opposite interpretations???
We can flee to Ocala........ they have some 30 foot hills there.what if we have a Judea, florida? lol
I don't knowOk. So these events are before the second coming AND effect the whole world. But Jesus just tells those Believers in Judah to flee. And what good would it do to flee to the mountains if these things are effecting the whole global world? If the anti-christ is in control of the whole global world what good would it do to flee Judah?
How do people get so confused as to try to make something clearly stating it is warning to those it was written to, into some kind of a message that meant nothing for them.... instead, is supposed to be seen as written for people who would not even be born for at least two millennia, now..... and STILL counting?
AND THE REALLY CRAZY PART...................... Every generation since that day has been sure it was written only, and specifically for THEM...... That's 50 generations of human beings, dead and buried.
Especially when all those things Jesus warned about already happened within 40 years of His speaking them?
Is that recent?Are you getting snow now?That is gorgeous.I am thinking when it snows around where I live it will be really pretty.mountains a 1/4 mile behind our house
I don't know
You're preaching to the choir..... that's why I said 50 generations have come and gone...... Many of them, (those not reading the simple language of the Bible as it is written) looking for something that already happened.No, not 50 generations. Matt Henry, Adam Clarke, John Gill....they all knew this was talking about Jerusalem's destruction in 70AD. Here is John Gill on verse 24:16....
"Then let them which be in Judea,.... When this signal is given, let it be taken notice of and observed; let them that are in the city of Jerusalem, depart out of it; or who are in any other parts of Judea, in any of the towns, or cities thereof; let them not betake themselves to Jerusalem, imagining they may be safe there, in so strong and fortified a place, but let them flee elsewhere; see Luke 21:21 and accordingly it is observed, that many did flee about this time; and it is remarked by several interpreters, and which Josephus (a) takes notice of with surprise, that Cestius Gallus having advanced with his army to Jerusalem, and besieged it, on a sudden, without any cause, raised the siege, and withdrew his army, when the city might have been easily taken; by which means a signal was made; and an opportunity given to the Christians, to make their escape: which they accordingly did, and went over Jordan, as Eusebius says (b), to a place called Pella; so that when Titus came a few mouths after, there was not a Christian in the city, but they had fled as they are here bidden to..."
http://biblehub.com/commentaries/gill/matthew/24.htm
The old guys had it right as far as the destruction of Jerusalem. It wasn't until Darby (which I suspect he got ahold of the that Catholic Jesuit's writings) then Scofield gets with Darby and we have this 1800's interpretation.
And do you see where Gill says not only Josephus gives testimony to this about the believers in Judea fleeing to the mountains around Pella but Eusebius does as well.
in deed or tallahasee.We can flee to Ocala........ they have some 30 foot hills there.
...except for tribulation. I'd rather sit that out at several thousand feet; either on a mountain or in midair.:wink@WillieT Partly i think people want to be a part of what God is doing...
I have read that but.. most of that source are from the kkk, neo Nazi type sources. so take it as such.Whoa, really? I sincerely hope that is not true. But it wouldn't surprise me if the Zionists back then did that.
mountains a 1/4 mile behind our house
he did. pm reba, she knows a person whom will know for sure. I read it from that same source.No, not 50 generations. Matt Henry, Adam Clarke, John Gill....they all knew this was talking about Jerusalem's destruction in 70AD. Here is John Gill on verse 24:16....
"Then let them which be in Judea,.... When this signal is given, let it be taken notice of and observed; let them that are in the city of Jerusalem, depart out of it; or who are in any other parts of Judea, in any of the towns, or cities thereof; let them not betake themselves to Jerusalem, imagining they may be safe there, in so strong and fortified a place, but let them flee elsewhere; see Luke 21:21 and accordingly it is observed, that many did flee about this time; and it is remarked by several interpreters, and which Josephus (a) takes notice of with surprise, that Cestius Gallus having advanced with his army to Jerusalem, and besieged it, on a sudden, without any cause, raised the siege, and withdrew his army, when the city might have been easily taken; by which means a signal was made; and an opportunity given to the Christians, to make their escape: which they accordingly did, and went over Jordan, as Eusebius says (b), to a place called Pella; so that when Titus came a few mouths after, there was not a Christian in the city, but they had fled as they are here bidden to..."
http://biblehub.com/commentaries/gill/matthew/24.htm
The old guys had it right as far as the destruction of Jerusalem. It wasn't until Darby (which I suspect he got ahold of the that Catholic Jesuit's writings) then Scofield gets with Darby and we have this 1800's interpretation.
And do you see where Gill says not only Josephus gives testimony to this about the believers in Judea fleeing to the mountains around Pella but Eusebius does as well.