Probably, but as I said, we can only speculate. Speculations are weak, I try to avoid them. Romans 5 says that his trespass is not like the trespass of those who came after him, because his was conscious disobedience, rejection of God whereas the trespasses that followed were sown into them by the world, thus they were fashioned to believe the sin they were doing in fact was doing good. The effect was the same though, in that it cut them off from God and made them slaves to sin (spiritual death).
Why do you see those as being two different things?
Can you give an example? I don't assume that it does include babies and chidren, unless they are in fact doing sin. Many things that parents punish children for in fact aren't sin. For example, a baby cries when he is hungry, but that isn't sin, it is just a cry of distress.
I answered that already. Please explain why my answer was not full enough.
But it is how that sin spreads that is the matter of discussion. The letter kills but the spirit gives life. They had lost the spirit of life even though they were still passing on words - through those words, the ways of sin are spread (1 Corinthians 15:33, Ephesians 2:1-3).
That's fine by me.
You have constructed that theory, and the bible doesn't support it. It forces you to speak blasphemy against the innocent ones.
Twice now, I tell you that you are committing fallacy. What Adam did was introduce sin to the world, so that it spread upon all and brought death to all. But it is wrong to say that the death comes on account of his sin, when in fact it comes on account of their individual sin, as a result of his having introduced sin in the first place.
Actually, it is because his sin was more severe. He was not deceived as Eve was, but he actually chose to follow Eve even though he saw that she had become a sinner. He chose to be with her in flesh and in so doing, abandoned the spirit of God.
What!?? There is no choice in the matter. A baby is 100% dependent on the world, and the world takes 100% liberty to fashion it into its own likeness. Have you ever seen a child that has remained 100% uncorrupted? The very fact that he doesn't steal other people's things is proof that the world has fashioned him in its image. Nobody is born with any sense of ownership - that is man's social construct. Many such things they do, that we need to overcome in order to be renewed in the mind (Luke 6: 27-38).
I will not quarrel. I know that you are resisting the truth and it is enough that I have said it already.
Let me know if you have any questions in order to understand how I can accept those scriptures without the doctrine that you know I am opposed to.
That does not make sense. A person cannot become a sinner unless they indeed do sin.
Do you believe Cain and Able were born with flesh that contained no sin?
JLB