Actually, the proper term is "born from above". The root word means both "above" and "again", but Jesus corrects Nicodemus' "again" with "above"...
Well, what Jesus said could mean "again" or "above", but even if scholars unanimously concluded that it meant "above", "again" would still be automatically implied. I would have to say that an "again" interpretation is a win/win situation.
It is a misnomer, because we aren't born again spiritually, we never WERE born spiritually the first time to be "born again" spiritually.
The flesh doesn't matter, in this case, so fleshy birth is inconsequential to the context. Being born from above suggests it is God's doing, and that is the important point.
Regards
Yes, Francis, I can possibly subscribe to that.
I will concede the point that I thought was rock-solid.
Unbelievable!
The funny thing is that after I hit "Submit Reply", I realized that "from above" could exist entirely without the "again" baggage that I initially thought was unavoidable, if one subscribes to the Calvinistic view, and believes that God chooses who is born "from above" and who isn't(I don't subscribe to that, but the somewhat popular belief exists, nevertheless).
However, I never suspected that you, Francis, would come unsuspectedly from
left field, and turn my prematurely-cocky
world upside down!
Having said that, I am only conceding to being closed-minded, and not allowing for any other dissenting possibilities. I am
not conceding that our natural earthly birthday is insignificant enough to not even qualify as one of our births. In other words, I am only conceding that it is still up for debate. :crazy